Literature DB >> 30729317

Blurring the boundary between open abdomen treatment and ventral hernia repair.

Samuel A Käser1, P Brosi2, P A Clavien2, R Vonlanthen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Therapeutic approaches for septic open abdomen treatment remain a major challenge with many uncertainties. The most convincing method is vacuum-assisted wound closure with mesh-mediated fascia traction with a protective plastic sheet placed on the viscera. As this plastic sheet and the mesh must be removed before final fascial closure, such a technique only allows temporary abdominal closure. This retrospective study analyzes the results of a modification of this technique allowing final abdominal closure using an anti-adhesive permeable polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) mesh.
METHODS: The outcome of all consecutive patients with septic open abdomen treatment at one academic surgical department from January 2013 to June 2015 was retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Retrospectively, 57 severely ill consecutive patients with septic open abdomen treatment with a 30-day mortality of 26% and a 2-year mortality of 51% were included in the study. In 26 patients, no mesh was implanted; in 31 patients, mesh implantation was done at median third-look laparotomy, median 5 days postoperative. Re-laparotomies after mesh implantation (median n = 2) revealed anastomotic leakage in 16% but no new bowel fistula. In 40% of those patients who had mesh implantation, fascia closure was not achieved and the mesh was left in place in a bridging position avoiding planned ventral hernia.
CONCLUSION: The application of an anti-adhesive PVDF mesh for fascia traction in vacuum-assisted wound closure of septic open abdomen is novel, versatile, and seems to be safe. It offers the highly relevant possibility for provisional and final abdominal closure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal sepsis; Bridging mesh; Mesh-mediated fascia traction; Open abdomen treatment; Vacuum-assisted wound closure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30729317     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01757-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  32 in total

1.  Dynamic retention: a technique for closure of the complex abdomen in critically ill patients.

Authors:  L G Koniaris; R J Hendrickson; G Drugas; P Abt; L O Schoeniger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-12

2.  Mortality and morbidity of planned relaparotomy versus relaparotomy on demand for secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  B Lamme; M A Boermeester; E J T Belt; J W O van Till; D J Gouma; H Obertop
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  On leaving the peritoneal cavity open in acute generalized suppurative peritonitis.

Authors:  D Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The use of vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds: a word of caution.

Authors:  M Rao; D Burke; P J Finan; P M Sagar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; James T Thompson; Byron J Faler; J Wayne Meredith; Michael C Chang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-11

6.  Open versus closed management of the abdomen in the surgical treatment of severe secondary peritonitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Felipe A Robledo; Enrique Luque-de-León; Roberto Suárez; Patricio Sánchez; Mauricio de-la-Fuente; Adriana Vargas; Juan Mier
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Usefulness of the bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method for early fascial closure in patients requiring open abdominal management.

Authors:  Shigeki Kushimoto; Yasuhiro Yamamoto; Junichi Aiboshi; Futoshi Ogawa; Yuichi Koido; Ryusuke Yoshida; Makato Kawai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Oddeke van Ruler; Cecilia W Mahler; Kimberly R Boer; E Ascelijn Reuland; Hein G Gooszen; Brent C Opmeer; Peter W de Graaf; Bas Lamme; Michael F Gerhards; E Philip Steller; J W Olivier van Till; Corianne J A M de Borgie; Dirk J Gouma; Johannes B Reitsma; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced.

Authors:  Preston R Miller; J Wayne Meredith; James C Johnson; Michael C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure.

Authors:  Betty J Tsuei; J Chris Skinner; Andrew C Bernard; Paul A Kearney; Bernard R Boulanger
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry : Surgical technique matters.

Authors:  A G Willms; R Schwab; M W von Websky; F Berrevoet; D Tartaglia; K Sörelius; R H Fortelny; M Björck; T Monchal; F Brennfleck; D Bulian; C Beltzer; C T Germer; J F Lock
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 2.920

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.