Literature DB >> 27600802

The effect of disfluency on mind wandering during text comprehension.

Myrthe Faber1, Caitlin Mills2, Kristopher Kopp2,3, Sidney D'Mello2,4.   

Abstract

When reading, we frequently find ourselves thinking about something other than the text. These attentional lapses, known as mind wandering (MW), are negatively correlated with text comprehension. Previous studies have shown that more syntactically and semantically difficult texts elicit more MW, because textual difficulty impedes the construction of a mental model of the text, which makes it more difficult to suppress off-task thoughts. But is it possible to reduce MW without altering the content of the text itself? We hypothesized that reading a perceptually disfluent text might require more attentional resources, even if the content remained the same, leaving fewer resources available for MW. To test this idea, we manipulated the typefaces (fluent [Arial] or disfluent [ ]) of two instructional texts on scientific research methods (each about 1,490 words long), and found that MW was less frequent when participants read the disfluent text. There were no comprehension differences between the fluent and disfluent groups. However, we did find an indirect effect of disfluency on comprehension through MW, suggesting that disfluency influences comprehension by enhancing attention. These findings provide insights into how processing difficulty and attention interact during reading comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Learning; Reading

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27600802     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1153-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Task unrelated thought: the role of distributed processing.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Marc Obonsawin; Derek Heim
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-06

2.  Fortune favors the bold (and the Italicized): effects of disfluency on educational outcomes.

Authors:  Connor Diemand-Yauman; Daniel M Oppenheimer; Erikka B Vaughan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-30

3.  Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel J Fishman; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

Review 4.  Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.

Authors:  Adam L Alter; Daniel M Oppenheimer
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07-28

5.  Suppressing secrecy through metacognitive ease: cognitive fluency encourages self-disclosure.

Authors:  Adam L Alter; Daniel M Oppenheimer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21

6.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Winter Mason; Siddharth Suri
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

Review 7.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Advances in mediation analysis: a survey and synthesis of new developments.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.

Authors:  Shi Feng; Sidney D'Mello; Arthur C Graesser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

10.  On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering.

Authors:  Natalie E Phillips; Caitlin Mills; Sidney D'Mello; Evan F Risko
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Null and Void? Errors in Meta-analysis on Perceptual Disfluency and Recommendations to Improve Meta-analytical Reproducibility.

Authors:  Sophia C Weissgerber; Matthias Brunmair; Ralf Rummer
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-02-03

2.  How the stimulus influences mind wandering in semantically rich task contexts.

Authors:  Myrthe Faber; Sidney K D'Mello
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-09-26

3.  Is less readable liked better? The case of font readability in poetry appreciation.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Jeroen Dera; Annabel D Nijhof; Roel M Willems
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.