Literature DB >> 27028355

On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering.

Natalie E Phillips1, Caitlin Mills2, Sidney D'Mello2, Evan F Risko1.   

Abstract

Re-reading has been shown to have a minimal benefit on text comprehension, in comparison to reading only once or other types of study techniques (e.g., testing; self-explanation). In two experiments we examined the effect of re-reading on mind wandering. Participants read two texts, during which they responded to intermittent mind wandering probes. One text was read once and the other twice. Consistent with previous findings, there was no effect of re-reading on comprehension even though participants reported feeling more competent when they re-read the text. Critically, participants mind wandered more while re-reading. Furthermore, the effect of re-reading on mind wandering was specific to intentional forms of mind wandering rather than unintentional. The implications of these results for understanding mind wandering and the limited effectiveness of re-reading as a mnemonic are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mind wandering; Re-reading; Study techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27028355     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1107109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  7 in total

1.  On the relation between motivation and retention in educational contexts: The role of intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Jeffrey D Wammes; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  The effect of disfluency on mind wandering during text comprehension.

Authors:  Myrthe Faber; Caitlin Mills; Kristopher Kopp; Sidney D'Mello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same, or distinct dimensions?

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Evan F Risko; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel L Schacter; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

4.  What did you have in mind? Examining the content of intentional and unintentional types of mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Brandon C W Ralph; Mahiko Konishi; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 5.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Michael J Kane; Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel L Schacter; David Maillet; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  A closer look at the timecourse of mind wandering: Pupillary responses and behaviour.

Authors:  Claudia Pelagatti; Paola Binda; Manila Vannucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.