Literature DB >> 11877876

The impact of a CAHPS report on employee knowledge, beliefs, and decisions.

Judith H Hibbard1, Nancy Berkman, Lauren A McCormack, Elizabeth Jael.   

Abstract

As comparative health plan performance data become more available, large employers are increasingly interested in knowing about the value in providing this information to employees to help them choose a plan. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine some of the key assumptions about how disseminating Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) report cards may influence employee knowledge, attitudes, and choice. The study used a quasi-experimental design, with preintervention and postintervention interviews with 958 employees. The findings indicate that exposure to the reports is related to having more information on how well the different plans perform on the CAHPS reporting categories. Furthermore, those who saw the report perceive the reporting categories to be more important in health plan choice than those who did not. Finally, the findings show that those who saw the report are more influenced by information sent by their employer than those who did not see the report.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11877876     DOI: 10.1177/107755870205900106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  16 in total

1.  Primary care in the United States: profiling performance in primary care in the United States.

Authors:  Norbert Goldfield; Shamini Gnani; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-05

Review 2.  Public release of performance data in changing the behaviour of healthcare consumers, professionals or organisations.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

3.  Responsive consumerism: empowerment in markets for health plans.

Authors:  Brian Elbel; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Haley Guhn-Knight; Lorna Murphy; Yara Youssef Budway; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality.

Authors:  Marcelo Coca Perraillon; R Tamara Konetzka; Daifeng He; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-23

6.  A field experiment on the impact of physician-level performance data on consumers' choice of physician.

Authors:  Steven C Martino; David E Kanouse; Marc N Elliott; Stephanie S Teleki; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; Jane R Mort
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Exploring consumer understanding and preferences for pharmacy quality information.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; Jane R Mort
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2014-03-15

9.  Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; David A Mott; Kenneth D Croes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.