Literature DB >> 27598774

Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.

Tanja Hüsch1, Alexander Kretschmer, Frauke Thomsen, Dominik Kronlachner, Martin Kurosch, Alice Obaje, Ralf Anding, Tobias Pottek, Achim Rose, Roberto Olianas, Alexander Friedl, Wilhelm Hübner, Roland Homberg, Jesco Pfitzenmaier, Ulrich Grein, Fabian Queissert, Carsten Maik Naumann, Josef Schweiger, Carola Wotzka, Joanne Nyarangi-Dix, Torben Hofmann, Kurt Ulm, Ricarda M Bauer, Axel Haferkamp.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We analysed the impact of predefined risk factors: age, diabetes, history of pelvic irradiation, prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), prior urethral stricture, additional procedure during SUI surgery, duration of incontinence, ASA-classification and cause for incontinence on failure and complications in male SUI surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 506 patients with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and 513 patients with a male sling (MS) in a multicenter cohort study. Complication rates were correlated to the risk factors in univariate analysis. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression adjusted to the risk factors was performed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: A history of pelvic irradiation was an independent risk factor for explantation in AUS (p < 0.001) and MS (p = 0.018). Moreover, prior urethral stricture (p = 0.036) and higher ASA-classification (p = 0.039) were positively correlated with explantation in univariate analysis for AUS. Urethral erosion was correlated with prior urethral stricture (p < 0.001) and a history of pelvic irradiation (p < 0.001) in AUS. Furthermore, infection was correlated with additional procedures during SUI surgery in univariate analysis (p = 0.037) in MS.
CONCLUSIONS: We first identified the correlation of higher ASA-classification and explantation in AUS. Nevertheless, only a few novel risk factors had a significant influence on the failure of MS or AUS.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial urinary sphincter; Implant surgery; Male sling; Risk factor; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27598774     DOI: 10.1159/000449232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  11 in total

1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Sonia Ruiz; Martín Lozano; Ignacio Arance; Miguel Virseda; David Lora
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Nicolas M Ortiz; Benjamin M Dropkin; Gregory A Joice; Adam S Baumgarten; Allen F Morey; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Authors:  Yves Deruyver; Charlotte Schillebeeckx; Elodie Beels; Dirk De Ridder; Frank Van der Aa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Fixed or adjustable sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: results from a large cohort study.

Authors:  Tanja Hüsch; Alexander Kretschmer; Alice Obaje; Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns; Ralf Anding; Tobias Pottek; Achim Rose; Roberto Olianas; Alexander Friedl; Roland Homberg; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Rudi Abdunnur; Fabian Queissert; Carsten M Naumann; Josef Schweiger; Carola Wotzka; Joanne Nyarangi-Dix; Torben Hofmann; Kurt Ulm; Wilhelm Hübner; Ricarda M Bauer; Axel Haferkamp
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

5.  Patterns and timing of artificial urinary sphincter failure.

Authors:  Andrew Jason Cohen; Kristine Kuchta; Sangtae Park; Jaclyn Milose
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Risk Factors for Revision After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Male Patients With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Celeste Manfredi; Pramod Krishnappa; Esaú Fernández-Pascual; Elena García Criado; Diego Rengifo; David Vázquez Alba; Joaquín Carballido; Davide Arcaniolo; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Effectiveness of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) to Treat Male Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Esquinas; Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  De novo OAB After ATOMS: An Underestimated Problem or a Rare Side Effect?

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Wilhelm Bauer; Nasreldin Mohammed; Clemens Brössner; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-12-17

9.  The impact of perioperative complications on favorable outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tanja Hüsch; Ralf Anding; Tobias Pottek; Achim Rose; Werner Struss; Fabian Queissert; Carsten M Naumann; Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Bernhard Brehmer; Axel Haferkamp; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for male stress incontinence.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Sandra Schönburg; Alessandro Giammò; Francisco J Abellán; Ignacio Arance; David Lora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.