| Literature DB >> 27598309 |
Sarah Tschudin-Sutter1, Olivier Braissant2, Stefan Erb1, Anne Stranden1, Gernot Bonkat3, Reno Frei4, Andreas F Widmer1.
Abstract
A broad spectrum of symptoms has been associated with C. difficile infection (CDI). Several studies indicate that toxin-production correlates with growth rates of C. difficile. This study aimed to correlate growth rates of C. difficile with disease severity and strain characteristics. From 01/2003 to 10/2011, strains from a prospective cohort of all inpatients with CDI at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland were analyzed regarding binary toxin, presence of the tcdC deletion and ribotype. Isothermal microcalorimetry was performed to determine growth rates, quantified by the Gompertz function. Ordered logistic regression models were used to correlate disease severity with strain features and clinical characteristics. Among 199 patients, 31 (16%) were infected with binary toxin-producing strains, of which the tcdC gene-deletion nt117 was detected in 9 (4%). Disease severity was classified as mild in 130 patients (65.3%), as severe in 59 patients (29.7%) and as severe/complicated in 10 patients (5.0%). Growth rates were inversely associated with disease severity in univariable (OR 0.514, 95%CI 0.29-0.91, p = 0.023) and multivariable analyses (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.26-0.97, p = 0.040). While none of the strain characteristics such as presence of the tcdC gene deletion or binary toxin predicted CDI severity, growth rates were inversely correlated with disease severity. Further investigations are needed to analyze growth-regulators and respective correlations with the level of toxin production in C. difficile, which may be important determinants of disease severity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27598309 PMCID: PMC5012633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161711
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Associations of clinical characteristics with disease severity.
| Associations of clinical characteristics with disease severity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild CDI (n = 130) | Severe CDI (n = 59) | Severe/complicatedCDI (n = 10) | OR | 95%CI | p-value | |
| Male | 70 (53.8%) | 20 (33.9%) | 5 (50%) | 0.52 | 0.28–0.93 | |
| Age | 65.8 (+/-16.1) | 66.4 (+/-16.4) | 67.2 (+/-9.2) | 1.00 | 0.98–1.02 | 0.739 |
| Number of comorbidities | 8 (0–10) | 8 (1–10) | 8 (5–8) | 0.93 | 0.83–1.04 | 0.217 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 2 (0–11) | 2 (0–8) | 2 (0–9) | 0.94 | 0.82–1.07 | 0.320 |
| Immunosuppression | 16 (12.3%) | 3 (5.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.32 | 0.09–1.15 | 0.081 |
| Bone marrow transplant | 11 (8.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Renal transplant | 5 (3.8%) | 2 (3.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.71 | 0.14–3.66 | 0.680 |
| Dialysis | 5 (3.8%) | 1 (1.7%) | 1 (10.0%) | 0.87 | 0.16–4.71 | 0.872 |
| Antibiotics | 122 (93.8%) | 56 (94.9%) | 9 (90%) | 1.14 | 0.21–6.15 | 0.883 |
| Steroids | 11 (8.5%) | 2 (3.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.32 | 0.07–1.50 | 0.149 |
| Chemotherapy | 19 (14.6%) | 7 (11.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.64 | 0.26–1.60 | 0.342 |
| Proton pump inhibitors | 87 (66.9%) | 31 (52.5%) | 6 (66.7%) | 0.60 | 0.32–1.12 | 0.106 |
CDI: Clostridium difficile infection
OR: Odds ratio
CI: Confidence interval
Significant p-values are printed in bold
Associations of strain characteristics with disease severity.
| Associations of strain characteristics with disease severity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild CDI (n = 130) | Severe CDI (n = 59) | Severe/complicated CDI (n = 10) | OR | 95%CI | p-value | |
| Binary toxin | 21 (16.2%) | 9 (15.3%) | 1 (10%) | 0.86 | 0.38–1.93 | 0.715 |
| tcdC deletion | 5 (3.9%) | 4 (6.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.36 | 0.37–4.94 | 0.642 |
| PCR ribotype 027 | 2 (1.5%) | 3 (5.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2.25 | 0.46–11.34 | 0.326 |
| PCR ribotype 078 | 7 (5.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PCR ribotype 126 | 5 (3.9%) | 3 (5.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.040 | 0.25–4.32 | 0.956 |
| 100 (76.9%) | 51 (86.4%) | 10 (100.0%) | 2.38 | 1.03–5.50 | ||
CDI: Clostridium difficile infection
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
OR: Odds ratio
CI: Confidence interval
Significant p-values are printed in bold
Fig 1a) Correlation of heat in joules (as determined by microcalorimetry) and optical density (OD600nm) readings over time for two different strains of toxigenic C. diffcile. b) Correlation of heat flow in microwatts and OD600nm over time. Heat measurements are indicated by lines and OD600nm readings are indicated by dots) for two different strains of toxigenic C. diffcile (indicated by red and green).
Analyses of growth rates according to different strain characteristics.
| Analyses of growth rates according to different strain characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect estimate | 95%CI | p-value | |
| Binary toxin | -0.11 | -0.31–0.10 | 0.313 |
| tcdC deletion | -0.08 | -0.43–0.28 | 0.672 |
| PCR ribotype 027 | 0.05 | -0.43–0.52 | 0.852 |
| PCR ribotype 078 | -0.12 | -0.52–0.28 | 0.567 |
| PCR ribotype 126 | -0.30 | -0.68–0.07 | 0.112 |
| -0.01 | -0.20–0.17 | 0.890 | |
Differences in mean growth rates were determined by univariable linear regression
PCR: Polymerase chain reaction
CI: Confidence interval
Crude and adjusted odds ratios for CDI severity.
| Crude and adjusted odds ratios for CDI severity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Adjusted | |||||
| OR | 95% CI | p-value | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
| Growth rate | 0.51 | 0.29–0.91 | 0.51 | 0.26–0.97 | ||
| Age | 1.00 | 0.98–1.02 | 0.739 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.03 | 0.521 |
| Male gender | 0.52 | 0.28–0.93 | 0.42 | 0.22–0.80 | ||
| Direct detection of toxin from stool | 2.38 | 1.03–5.50 | 2.70 | 1.13–6.44 | ||
| Time (categorized by study year) | 0.86 | 0.77–0.97 | 0.88 | 0.77–0.99 | ||
CDI: Clostridium difficile infection
OR: Odds ratio
CI: Confidence interval
Significant p-values are printed in bold
Fig 2Growth rates of C. difficile as determined by microcalorimetry and quantified by the Gompertz function according to disease severity (a), presence of the gene encoding for binary toxin (b), presence of tcdC gene deletion (c) and different strain types (d).