| Literature DB >> 27598135 |
Maciej Grzybek1,2, Wirginia Kukula-Koch3, Aneta Strachecka4, Aleksandra Jaworska5,6, Andrew M Phiri7,8, Jerzy Paleolog9, Krzysztof Tomczuk10.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: A significant number of studies report growing resistance in nematodes thriving in both humans and livestock. This study was conducted to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo anthelmintic efficiency of Curcubita pepo (C. pepo) L. hot water extract (HWE), cold water extract (CWE) or ethanol extract (ETE) on two model nematodes: Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and Heligmosoides bakeri (H. bakeri).Entities:
Keywords: Caenorhabditis elegans; Cucurbitaceae; Heligmosoides bakeri; LC-ESI-MS; anthelmintics; berberine; in vivo studies; plant extracts; pumpkin; spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27598135 PMCID: PMC5037735 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Raman spectra of three investigated extracts: HWE—Hot water extract; CWE—Cold water extract and ETE—Ethanol extract.
Position of bands (in cm−1) with their assignment in the ATR IR spectra of three investigated extracts: hot water extract (HWE), cold water extract (CWE) and ethanol extract (ETE) from pumpkin seeds.
| HWE Band (cm−1) | CWE Band (cm−1) | ETE Band (cm−1) | Assignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 417 | - | 423 | PO2 |
| - | - | 477 | polisaccharides, amylose, amylopectin |
| - | - | 635 | νC-S (AA: methionin) |
| - | 677 | 677 | DNA: ring, G |
| - | 710 | 712 | νC-S (AA: methionin) |
| - | - | 816 | proline, hydroxyproline, tyrosine, PO2 |
| 874 | - | - | hydroxyproline, tryptophane |
| 972 | - | 961 | fatty acids |
| - | 999 | 1001 | phenylalanine |
| - | - | 1055 | amylose |
| 1075 | - | - | fatty acids |
| - | 1084 | - | DNA |
| - | - | 1111 | cellulose |
| - | - | 1148 | carbohydrates |
| 1267 | - | 1277 | unsaturated fatty acids |
| 1304 | 1302 | 1295 | fatty acids |
| - | - | 1372 | DNA: T, A, G; saccharides |
| - | - | 1420 | DNA: A, G |
| 1441 | 1441 | 1449 | fatty acids |
| - | - | 1485 | DNA: A, G |
| - | - | 1556 | Amide II |
| - | - | 1571 | DNA: A, G |
| - | - | 1586 | phenylalanine, hydroxyproline |
| - | - | 1605 | phenylalanine, tyrosine, NO2 |
| 1657 | 1657 | 1655 | unsaturated fatty acids/proteins (amide I) |
| 1746 | - | - | fatty acids |
| 2722 | - | - | νC-H, νN-H, νO-H |
| 2855 | 2854 | - | saturated fatty acids |
| 2928 | 2918 | 2920 | saturated fatty acids |
| 3011 | 3008 | - | unsaturated fatty acids |
“-“—Indicates the lack of signal recorded.
Figure 2Compounds confirmed in the LC-ESI-TOF-MS analysis of Curcubita pepo (C. pepo) extracts.
Accurate LC-ESI-TOF-MS mass measurements of compounds identified in the Curcubita pepo (C. pepo) seed extracts.
| Mode | Rt (min) | Molecular Formula | Δ ppm | RDB | In Source ESI-MS Fragments | Proposed Compound | ETE | HWE | CWE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M + H]+ | 25.47 | C20H18NO4 | 335.1155 | 335.1158 | 0.7 | 13 | 321, 306, 292, 278 | Berberine | ++ | ++ | + |
| [M + H]+ | 25.87 | C21H22NO4 | 352.1539 | 352.1543 | 1.24 | 12 | 337, 322, 308, 292 | Palmatine | + | ++ | + |
| [M + H]+ | 2.2 | C5H10N2O2 | 131.0832 | 131.0815 | 2.34 | 2 | ND | Cucurbitine | + | + | ++ |
| [M + H]+ | 2.6 | C6H13N3O3 | 175.0978 | 175.0951 | 1.56 | 2 | ND | Citrulline | + | + | + |
| [M + H]+ | 14.20 | C9H11NO2 | 166.0860 | 166.0863 | 1.55 | 5 | 120, 103 | + | ++ | +++ | |
| [M + H]+ | 15.63 | C11H12N2O2 | 205.0974 | 205.0972 | −1.2 | 7 | 188, 146, 118 | +++ | + | +++ | |
| [M + H]+ | 8.85 | C5H10NO2 | 118.0855 | 118.0863 | 6.45 | 1 | ND | +++ | + | + | |
| [M + H]+ | 15.49 | C10H13N5O4 | 268.1037 | 268.1040 | 1.24 | 7 | 184, 136, 118 | Adenosine | ++ | ++ | + |
| [M − H]− | 69.40 | C16H32O2 | 255.2330 | 255.2322 | 2.94 | 1 | ND | Palmitic acid | ++++ | +++ | ++++ |
| [M − H]− | 66.32 | C16H30O2 | 253.2143 | 253.2139 | −3.0 | 2.5 | 112 | Palmitoleic acid | ++ | + | ++ |
| [M − H]− | 63.52 | C18H36O2 | 283.2643 | 283.2642 | 0.19 | 1 | 239 | Stearic acid | - | ++ | ++ |
| [M − H]− | 70.96 | C18H34O2 | 281.2486 | 281.2492 | −2.11 | 2 | 237 | Oleic acid | ++ | +++ | ++++ |
| [M − H]− | 67.06 | C18H32O2 | 279.2330 | 279.2323 | 2.33 | 3 | 235 | Linoleic acid | +++ | ++++ | +++++ |
| [M − H]− | 64.33 | C18H30O2 | 277.2173 | 277.2179 | −2.14 | 4 | 233, 205 | α-Linolenic acid | ++ | + | + |
RDB—double bond equivalent, ETE—Ethanol extract, HWE—Hot water extract, CWE—Cold water extract, ND—No data, Rt—Retention time, “-“—Lack of presence, “+/++/+++/++++”—The subjective rating of the compounds concentration in different extracts, where “+” is the lowest and “++++”—The highest content.
Figure 3Comparison of least square means of egg hatching percentages for pumpkin seed extracts, negative control and positive control.
Motility scores for treatment of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) with pumpkin seeds extracts—overnight incubation. Scores: 5 for highly motile and thrashing vigorously; 4 for less motile but still thrashing; 3 for a marked reduction in both motility and thrashing; 2 for very sluggish movement, or motility confined to the ends of the worm; 1 for occasional very slow movement; and 0 for no visible movement whatsoever.
| Strain | Control | 1000 µg/mL CWE | 1000 µg/mL HWE | 1000 µg/mL ETE | 75 µg/mL HWE | 75 µg/mL ETE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | |
| CB 7031 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| CB 7014 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Figure 4The least development inhibition square means (% L1–L2) for the different extracts of C. pepo seeds, compared to negative control PBS and to positive control albendazole.
Figure 5Least square means of adult worm percentage of motility for the different pumpkin seeds extracts, in comparison to the negative and positive control. ETE—Ethanol extracts; HWE—Hot water extracts; CWE—Cold water extracts; PSB—Phosphate-buffered saline.
Figure 6Mean number of worms recovered at necropsy. Group A received distilled water as a negative control. The animals in groups B, C, D, E were treated with the ETE at doses of 2, 4, 6, 8 g/kg of body weight, respectively.
Figure 7Ethanol C. pepo extract produces a dose-dependent quantitative reduction in H. bakeri worm number.
Figure 8Substantial anthelmintic activity of C. pepo ethanol extract against H. bakeri. The graph shows results for the E group treated with a high dose of the extract (8 g/kg body weight). The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. ▲ indicates the day of treatment.