| Literature DB >> 27596278 |
Lauren J Simmons1, Monique C Surles-Zeigler1, Yonggang Li2, Gregory D Ford3, Gale D Newman1, Byron D Ford4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that neuregulin-1 (NRG-1) was neuroprotective in rats following ischemic stroke. Neuroprotection by NRG-1 was associated with the suppression of pro-inflammatory gene expression in brain tissues. Over-activation of brain microglia can induce pro-inflammatory gene expression by activation of transcriptional regulators following stroke. Here, we examined how NRG-1 transcriptionally regulates inflammatory gene expression by computational bioinformatics and in vitro using microglial cells.Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Gene expression; Inflammation; Ischemia; Microarray; Neuregulin; Stroke; Transcription factor-binding site (TFBS)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27596278 PMCID: PMC5011915 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-016-0703-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Neuregulin-1 administration reduces MCAO/reperfusion-induced brain infarction. Representative TTC-stained coronal brain sections are shown. Rats were administered vehicle (a) or NRG-1 before MCAO (b). The white area indicates damaged neuronal cells (arrows) and red staining indicates normally functioning cells
Inflammatory genes induced by ischemia and downregulated by NRG-1
| A kinase anchor protein 12 | Akap12 |
| Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 1B | Arpc1b |
| Activating transcription factor 3 | Atf3 |
| Annexin A1 | Anxa1 |
| Annexin A2 | Anxa2 |
| Benzodiazepine receptor (peripheral)-associated protein 1 | bzrp |
| Brain-derived factor | Bdnf |
| CAMP responsive element modulator | Crem |
| Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein | Comp |
| Catechol- | Comt |
| CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, delta | Cebpd |
| CD36 antigen | cd36 |
| Cellular retinoic-binding protein 2 | Crabp2 |
| Crystallin, alpha B | Cryab |
| Cytochrome P450 family 1 | Cyp1b1 |
| Deiodinase iodothyronine type III | Dio3 |
| Dyskeratosis congenita 1 | Dkc1 |
| Early growth response 1 | Egr1 |
| Endothelin converting enzyme 1 | Ece1 |
| Fx receptor, IgG, low-affinity III | Fcgr3 |
| Galanin | Gal |
| Glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1 | Glycam1 |
| Guanine nucleotide-binding protein gamma 11 | Gng11 |
| Guanylate-binding protein | Gbp2 |
| Heat shock protein 4 | Hspa4 |
| High mobility group of box 2 | Hmgb2 |
| Homer scaffolding protein 1 | Homer1 |
| Inhibitor of DNA binding 1 | Id1 |
| Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 | Igfbp3 |
| Interleukin 1 beta | IL1b |
| Isopentenyl-diphosphate delta isomerase 1 | Idi1 |
| Kininogen 1 | Kng |
| Kruppel-like factor 4 | Klf4 |
| Lectin galatoside-binding soluble 2 | LgalS2 |
| Lipocalin 2 | Lcn |
| Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein | Lbp |
| Lysozyme | Lyz |
| Matrix gla protein | Mgp |
| Matrix metallopeptidase 9 | MMP9 |
| Mitogen-activated protein kinase e, E3 | Map |
| Oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 | Olr1 |
| Phospholipase A1 | Pspla1 |
| Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthase-associated protein 1 | Prpsap1 |
| Phosphorylase glycogen liver | Pygl |
| Plasminogen activator tissue | Plat |
| Potassium channel member 12 | Kcnj12 |
| Potassium channel, two pore domain subfamily K member 3 | Kcnk3 |
| Protaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 | Ptgs2 |
| Rentinol-binding protein 1 | Rbp1 |
| Ret proto-oncogene | Ret |
| Ribosomal protein S15 | Rps15 |
| S100 calcium-binding protein A10 | S100a10 |
| S100 calcium-binding protein A4 | S100a4 |
| S100 calcium-binding protein A8 | S100a8 |
| S100 calcium-binding protein A9 | S100a9 |
| Secreted phosphoprotein 1 | Spp1 |
| Serpin peptidase inhibitor | Serpin1 |
| Syndecan 1 | Sdc1 |
| Thyrotropin releasing hormone | Trh |
| TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 | Timp1 |
| Transgelin | Tagln |
| V-ETS avian erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog 1 | ETS1 |
| VGF nerve growth factor inducible | Vgf |
| Vimentin | Vim |
Fig. 2Predicted transcription factor-binding site (TFBS) activity for gene promoters using CONFAC analysis. CONFAC compared our gene list to seven random control datasets to identify statistically over-represented TFBS in genes altered by stroke and reversed by NRG-1. CONFAC identified 12 TFBS that were statistically over-represented. Blue bars represent the average number of TFBS/promoter for each transcription factor in our data set. Red bars are the average number of TFBS/promoter for each transcription factor in the control datasets. p < 0.05 for all transcription factors in the graph
Fig. 3NRG-1 suppresses TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations in LPS-stimulated N9 microglia cells. N9 microglia cells were pre-treated with NRG-1 (100 ng/ml) for 24 h with or without LPS stimulation (10 μg/ml) for the indicated time points. Supernatants were collected, and TNF-α (a) and IL-6 (b) levels were determined by Luminex. Results are expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)
Fig. 4NRG-1 suppresses the phosphorylation of IkB-α in LPS-stimulated N9 microglia cells. N9 microglial cells were pre-treated with 100 ng/ml NRG-1 for 24 h followed by the absence or presence of LPS (10 μg/ml) for indicated time points. a, b Cell lysates were taken and were assayed using ELISA. Results were expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)
Fig. 5NRG-1 inhibits the degradation of IkB-α in LPS-stimulated N9 microglia cells. N9 microglial cells were pre-treated with 100 ng/ml NRG-1 for 24 h followed by the absence or presence of LPS (10 μg/ml) for 1 h (a) and 3 h (b). Whole cell extracts were taken from untreated cells or cells pre-treated NRG-1 alone or the absence or presence of LPS (10 μg/ml) and were assayed using western blot. The band intensity was quantified using studio lite imager and is presented relative to the level of β-actin. Data are presented for three independent experiments. Results were expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)
Fig. 6NRG-1 reduces nuclear translocation of P65. N9 microglial cells were pre-treated with 100 ng/ml NRG-1 for 24 h followed by the absence or presence of LPS (10 μg/ml) for 3 h. Nuclear (a) and cytoplasmic (b) extracts were assayed using western blot. Nuclear extracts were assayed using ELISA (c). Data are presented from three independent experiments. Results were expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)
Fig. 7NRG-1 increased nuclear translocation of P52. N9 microglial cells were pre-treated with 100 ng/ml NRG-1 for 24 h followed by the absence or presence of LPS (10 μg/ml) for 3–24 h. Cell lysates were taken and were assayed using ELISA measuring levels of p52 (a) and RelB (b). Results were expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)
Fig. 8NRG-1 increases G-CSF and IL-9 concentrations in N9 microglia cells. N9 microglia cells were pre-treated with NRG-1 (100 ng/ml) for 24 h with or without LPS stimulation (10 μg/ml) for the indicated time points. Conditioned medium was collected and G-CSF (a) and IL-9 (b) levels were determined by Luminex. Results are expressed as the mean +/− SD. Asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to cells treated with only LPS (p < 0.05)