Literature DB >> 27595749

FDG-PET in the evaluation of response to nivolumab in recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer.

Mitsunori Higuchi1, Yuki Owada2, Takuya Inoue2, Yuzuru Watanabe2, Takumi Yamaura2, Mitsuro Fukuhara2, Takeo Hasegawa2, Hiroyuki Suzuki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is recently clinically applied to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and this causes T cell activation and T cell infiltration to tumor tissue through the blockade of the interaction between programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) sometimes shows false positive because of the recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages. To date, there is only one report except our case, which described the correlation between FDG-PET and nivolumab. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report on a 75-year-old man on nivolumab treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. He had undergone right lower lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma in the right S8 segment 10 months prior to recurrence. Pathological findings revealed invasive adenocarcinoma, pT1bN2M0 stage IIIA. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was positive for de novo T790M and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was negative. Immunohistochemistry was negative for PD-L1. He underwent chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed for four cycles but developed progressive disease involving the right hemithorax, multiple lymph nodes, and multiple osseous sites. Nivolumab was instituted as a second-line chemotherapy. After six courses of this immunotherapy, FDG-PET scan showed decreased FDG uptake in each recurrent lesion despite T lymphocyte activation by nivolumab. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level was also remarkably decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab's effect on recurrent NSCLC may be monitored by PET; larger studies are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nivolumab; Non-small cell lung cancer; Positron emission tomography; Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1); Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595749      PMCID: PMC5011843          DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0998-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Advances in the treatment of non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the past decade include third-generation platinum doublets, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) TKIs in ALK rearrangement-positive disease, maintenance systemic therapy, and second- or third-line treatment, which improve survival [2-9]. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced [10-12], and their effectiveness is promising. Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor that is an antibody against programmed death-1 (PD-1), causes T cell activation and demonstrates clinically relevant antitumor activity. In some phase III trials, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were better with nivolumab than with docetaxel in NSCLC [13, 14]. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is an effective tool for assessing treatment response and surveillance of disease recurrence; however, it sometimes shows increased FDG uptake at sites of local inflammatory changes caused by the recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages [15]. We present a case of a patient with metastatic NSCLC who underwent nivolumab treatment as a second line chemotherapy and whose PET scan showed decreased FDG uptake after treatment in spite of nivolumab’s known T cell activation properties.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of metastatic NSCLC. He had undergone right lower lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma originating in the right S8 segment as initial treatment. Postoperative findings revealed invasive adenocarcinoma with pT1bN2M0 stage IIIA. An EGFR mutation was positive for de novo T790M, and ALK rearrangement was negative. Immunohistochemistry was negative for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (Fig. 1). Ten months after his initial surgery, recurrence was detected in the form of multiple bone and lymph nodes metastases and right intrathoracic dissemination. He underwent chemotherapy with a combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed for four cycles (Bevacizumab was withheld because of his past history of cerebral hemorrhage.). After first line chemotherapy, his clinical imaging revealed increasing size and number of metastatic sites, which were graded as progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST) [16]. We decided to administer nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks as a second-line chemotherapy. Before starting this immunotherapy, his medical check-up revealed stable borderline diabetes. Hormonal examination such as adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), ftee T3 (FT3), free T4 (FT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AchR Ab) were also within normal range. No adverse events occurred during the course of this immunotherapy.
Fig. 1

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×100) (a) and immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 (b) of surgically resected NSCLC tissue. H&E staining showed invasive adenocarcinoma papillary predominant type and immunohistochemical staining showed negative for PD-L1

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (×100) (a) and immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 (b) of surgically resected NSCLC tissue. H&E staining showed invasive adenocarcinoma papillary predominant type and immunohistochemical staining showed negative for PD-L1 After six courses of this immunotherapy, an FDG-PET scan showed decreased FDG uptake in each recurrent lesion (Fig. 2). Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were also decreased (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

FDG uptake before (a) and after (b) immunotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of supraclavicular lymph node and disseminated lesions before and after immunotherapy decreased from 9.8 to no accumulation and 5.9 to 3.4, respectively. Each SUVmax was decreased after six courses of nivolumab treatment

Fig. 3

Clinical course of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels during treatment. Serum CEA level decreased from 1335.0 to 108.4 ng/mL after six courses of nivolumab treatment

FDG uptake before (a) and after (b) immunotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of supraclavicular lymph node and disseminated lesions before and after immunotherapy decreased from 9.8 to no accumulation and 5.9 to 3.4, respectively. Each SUVmax was decreased after six courses of nivolumab treatment Clinical course of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels during treatment. Serum CEA level decreased from 1335.0 to 108.4 ng/mL after six courses of nivolumab treatment

Discussion

In patients with recurrent or advanced NSCLC, who have relapsed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy or EGFR-TKI, docetaxel monotherapy is considered to be the current standard treatment regimen [5, 7]. In a phase III study involving docetaxel in patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, the time to progression and median survival time (MST) after docetaxel monotherapy has been reported to be 10.6 weeks and 7.0 months, respectively [6]. Recent prospective studies including CheckMate 017 [13] and CheckMate 057 [14] showed that nivolumab was superior to docetaxel for squamous cell carcinoma and non-squamous cell carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based agents. Based on these studies, the current second-line chemotherapy in patients failing platinum-based chemotherapy is considered to be nivolumab. These studies suggested that a radiological response had been detected approximately 8 weeks (4th course) after initial administration of nivolumab. The combination of FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) is an effective tool for assessing treatment response and for surveillance for disease recurrence in cases treated with chemotherapy or radiation. Many investigators have reported the utility of FDG-PET or FDG-PET/CT in evaluating therapeutic response prospectively or retrospectively [17-20]. Complete disappearance of abnormal FDG accumulation is an indicator of a low probability of local recurrence and better prognosis after treatment such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Immunotherapy presents a potential problem because the inflammatory changes caused by the recruitment of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages [15] may lower the specificity because these cells take up FDG. More specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors activate T cells, which infiltrate tumor tissue. Uptake by the T cells might affect the evaluation of immunotherapy. To date, there is only one report except our case, which showed the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab in a patient with indolent Hodgkin lymphoma [21]. Although we usually evaluate the anatomic tumor response with RECIST [16] or immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) [22] after cancer treatment, Wall et al. [23] proposed PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (PERCIST) to assess the treatment response instead of RECIST. PERCIST evaluates the metabolic tumor response using the change of SUV ratio in the region of interest between the tumor and liver. The evaluation criteria of PERCIST would be more helpful to evaluate the treatment effects in the cases with FDG-PET. The optimal follow-up schedule of FDG-PET scan during immunotherapy is unclear. In fact, little is known about the role of FDG-PET and CT scan as appropriate radiological modalities. Some exploratory clinical studies (UMIN000020707 and UMIN000020814) have been conducted and ongoing in Japan to evaluate FDG-PET in nivolumab therapy. In our case, FDG-PET was considered to be a useful tool for the evaluation during immunotherapy. However, it is uncertain what the optimal timing of FDG-PET scanning will yield the highest specificity and sensitivity. More research in this area is needed. An urgent issue to be resolved is to explore more specific biomarker of this treatment because the correlation between PD-L1 expression by the tumor tissue and treatment effect with nivolumab has not been quantified. However, immunotherapy shows promise to improve the prognosis of patients with unresectable or recurrent NSCLC.

Conclusions

We have found decreased FDG uptake by tumor after six courses of nivolumab treatment, suggesting the potential value of FDG-PET in monitoring the response to this immunotherapy. T cell activation and infiltration into tumor tissue did not affect the results of FDG-PET in this case. We await detailed results of ongoing clinical studies using FDG-PET for the evaluation of this immunotherapy.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Weber
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  F A Shepherd; J Dancey; R Ramlau; K Mattson; R Gralla; M O'Rourke; N Levitan; L Gressot; M Vincent; R Burkes; S Coughlin; Y Kim; J Berille
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nasser Hanna; Frances A Shepherd; Frank V Fossella; Jose R Pereira; Filippo De Marinis; Joachim von Pawel; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Thomas Chang Yao Tsao; Miklos Pless; Thomas Muller; Hong-Liang Lim; Christopher Desch; Klara Szondy; Radj Gervais; Christian Manegold; Sofia Paul; Paolo Paoletti; Lawrence Einhorn; Paul A Bunn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The Maximum standardized uptake value is more reliable than size measurement in early follow-up to evaluate potential pulmonary malignancies following radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Aierken Alafate; Takayoshi Shinya; Yoshihiro Okumura; Shuhei Sato; Takao Hiraki; Hiroaki Ishii; Hideo Gobara; Katsuya Kato; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara; Shinichiro Miyoshi; Mitsumasa Kaji; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Acta Med Okayama       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.892

7.  Preliminary retrospective investigation of FDG-PET/CT timing in follow-up of ablated lung tumor.

Authors:  Fumiyo Higaki; Yoshihiro Okumura; Shuhei Sato; Takao Hiraki; Hideo Gobara; Hidefumi Mimura; Shiro Akaki; Toshihide Tsuda; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.668

8.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death.

Authors:  Y Ishida; Y Agata; K Shibahara; T Honjo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.

Authors:  O Humbert; N Cadour; M Paquet; R Schiappa; M Poudenx; D Chardin; D Borchiellini; D Benisvy; M J Ouvrier; C Zwarthoed; A Schiazza; M Ilie; H Ghalloussi; P M Koulibaly; J Darcourt; J Otto
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Metabolic activity by 18F-FDG-PET/CT is predictive of early response after nivolumab in previously treated NSCLC.

Authors:  Kyoichi Kaira; Tetsuya Higuchi; Ichiro Naruse; Yukiko Arisaka; Azusa Tokue; Bolag Altan; Satoshi Suda; Akira Mogi; Kimihiro Shimizu; Noriaki Sunaga; Takeshi Hisada; Shigehisa Kitano; Hideru Obinata; Takehiko Yokobori; Keita Mori; Masahiko Nishiyama; Yoshihito Tsushima; Takayuki Asao
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  ImmunoPET Imaging of CTLA-4 Expression in Mouse Models of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Christopher G England; Rebecca L Majewski; Hector F Valdovinos; Dawei Jiang; Glenn Liu; Douglas G McNeel; Robert J Nickles; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Splenic volume as a predictor of treatment response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy.

Authors:  Francesca Castagnoli; Simon Doran; Jason Lunn; Anna Minchom; Mary O'Brien; Sanjay Popat; Christina Messiou; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  PET/CT and the Response to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Matteo Sepulcri; Giulia Pasello
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2020

6.  Anti PD-1 treatment increases [18F]FDG uptake by cancer cells in a mouse B16F10 melanoma model.

Authors:  Mayu Tomita; Hironobu Yasui; Kei Higashikawa; Kohei Nakajima; Hideo Takakura; Tohru Shiga; Yuji Kuge; Mikako Ogawa
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  Response evaluation after immunotherapy in NSCLC: Early response assessment using FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Youngjoo Lee; Tae-Sung Kim; Seok-Ki Kim; Ji-Youn Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy : Report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Rodney J Hicks; Christophe Le Tourneau; Stéphanie Lheureux; Stefano Fanti; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  The efficiency of 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting the major pathologic response to the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiuli Tao; Ning Li; Ning Wu; Jie He; Jianming Ying; Shugeng Gao; Shuhang Wang; Jie Wang; Zhijie Wang; Yun Ling; Wei Tang; Zewei Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 9.236

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.