Literature DB >> 23724913

Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer.

Alice T Shaw1, Dong-Wan Kim, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Takashi Seto, Lucio Crinó, Myung-Ju Ahn, Tommaso De Pas, Benjamin Besse, Benjamin J Solomon, Fiona Blackhall, Yi-Long Wu, Michael Thomas, Kenneth J O'Byrne, Denis Moro-Sibilot, D Ross Camidge, Tony Mok, Vera Hirsh, Gregory J Riely, Shrividya Iyer, Vanessa Tassell, Anna Polli, Keith D Wilner, Pasi A Jänne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In single-group studies, chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) have been associated with marked clinical responses to crizotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ALK. Whether crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy with respect to efficacy is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, open-label trial comparing crizotinib with chemotherapy in 347 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive lung cancer who had received one prior platinum-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral treatment with crizotinib (250 mg) twice daily or intravenous chemotherapy with either pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were permitted to cross over to crizotinib as part of a separate study. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months in the crizotinib group and 3.0 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for progression or death with crizotinib, 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.64; P<0.001). The response rates were 65% (95% CI, 58 to 72) with crizotinib, as compared with 20% (95% CI, 14 to 26) with chemotherapy (P<0.001). An interim analysis of overall survival showed no significant improvement with crizotinib as compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death in the crizotinib group, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.54; P=0.54). Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, alopecia, and dyspnea. Patients reported greater reductions in symptoms of lung cancer and greater improvement in global quality of life with crizotinib than with chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib is superior to standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement. (Funded by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00932893.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23724913     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1254 in total

1.  NCCN Working Group report: designing clinical trials in the era of multiple biomarkers and targeted therapies.

Authors:  Alan P Venook; Maria E Arcila; Al B Benson; Donald A Berry; David Ross Camidge; Robert W Carlson; Toni K Choueiri; Valerie Guild; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Razelle Kurzrock; Christine M Lovly; Amy E McKee; Robert J Morgan; Anthony J Olszanski; Mary W Redman; Vered Stearns; Joan McClure; Marian L Birkeland
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Alectinib: A Review in Advanced, ALK-Positive NSCLC.

Authors:  Julia Paik; Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Engineering and Functional Characterization of Fusion Genes Identifies Novel Oncogenic Drivers of Cancer.

Authors:  Hengyu Lu; Nicole Villafane; Turgut Dogruluk; Caitlin L Grzeskowiak; Kathleen Kong; Yiu Huen Tsang; Oksana Zagorodna; Angeliki Pantazi; Lixing Yang; Nicholas J Neill; Young Won Kim; Chad J Creighton; Roel G Verhaak; Gordon B Mills; Peter J Park; Raju Kucherlapati; Kenneth L Scott
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Co-clinical trials demonstrate superiority of crizotinib to chemotherapy in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and predict strategies to overcome resistance.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Esra Akbay; Oliver Mikse; Tanya Tupper; Katherine Cheng; Yuchuan Wang; Xiaohong Tan; Abigail Altabef; Sue-Ann Woo; Liang Chen; Jacob B Reibel; Pasi A Janne; Norman E Sharpless; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Andrew L Kung; Kwok-Kin Wong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Crizotinib: a review of its use in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Economic Considerations in the Use of Novel Targeted Therapies for Lung Cancer: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Hamzeh Albaba; Charles Lim; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Chart review versus an automated bioinformatic approach to assess real-world crizotinib effectiveness in ALK-positive NSCLC.

Authors:  Nam Bui; Solomon Henry; Douglas Wood; Heather A Wakelee; Joel W Neal
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-03-13

9.  Clinical efficacy of crizotinib in Chinese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Lei; Jin-Ji Yang; Wen-Zhao Zhong; Hua-Jun Chen; Hong-Hong Yan; Jie-Fei Han; Lu-Lu Yang; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase as a Therapeutic Target in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wade T Iams; Christine M Lovly
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.