Literature DB >> 31760467

18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns.

O Humbert1,2, N Cadour3, M Paquet3, R Schiappa4, M Poudenx5, D Chardin3,6, D Borchiellini5,7, D Benisvy3, M J Ouvrier3, C Zwarthoed3, A Schiazza3, M Ilie8, H Ghalloussi5, P M Koulibaly3, J Darcourt3,6, J Otto5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective study aimed (1) to assess the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evolutive patterns to immunotherapy using FDG-PET and (2) to describe their association with clinical outcome.
DESIGN: Fifty patients with metastatic NSCLC were included before pembrolizumab or nivolumab initiation. FDG-PET scan was performed at baseline and after 7 weeks of treatment (PETinterim1) and different criteria/parameters of tumor response were assessed, including PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). If a first PERCIST progressive disease (PD) without clinical worsening was observed, treatment was continued and a subsequent FDG-PET (PETinterim2) was performed at 3 months of treatment. Pseudo-progression (PsPD) was defined as a PERCIST response/stability on PETinterim2 after an initial PD. If a second PERCIST PD was assessed on PETinterim2, a homogeneous progression of lesions (termed immune homogeneous progressive-disease: iPDhomogeneous) was distinguished from a heterogeneous evolution (termed immune dissociated-response: iDR). A durable clinical benefit (DCB) of immunotherapy was defined as treatment continuation over a 6-month period. The association between PET evolutive profiles and DCB was assessed.
RESULTS: Using PERCIST on PETinterim1, 42% (21/50) of patients showed a response or stable disease, most of them (18/21) reached a DCB. In contrast, 58% (29/50) showed a PD, but more than one-third (11/29) were misclassified as they finally reached a DCB. No standard PETinterim1 criteria could accurately distinguished responding from non-responding patients. Treatment was continued in 19/29 of patients with a first PERCIST PD; the subsequent PETinterim2 demonstrated iPDhomogeneous, iDR and PsPD in 42% (8/19), 26% (5/19), and 32% (6/19), respectively. Whereas no patients with iPDhomogeneous experienced a DCB, all patients with iDR and PsPD reached a clinical benefit to immunotherapy.
CONCLUSION: In patients with a first PD on PERCIST and treatment continuation, a subsequent PET identifies more than half of them with iDR and PsPD, both patterns being strongly associated with a clinical benefit of immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG PET; Immunotherapy; Lung cancer; Monitoring; Response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31760467     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04573-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

1.  Incidence of Brain Metastases on Follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Should We Include the Brain?

Authors:  Emily S Nia; Linda L Garland; Naghmehossadat Eshghi; Benjamin B Nia; Ryan J Avery; Phillip H Kuo
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2017-07-13

Review 2.  Predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Geoffrey T Gibney; Louis M Weiner; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Thoracic Imaging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Anti-programmed Death Receptor-1 Therapy.

Authors:  Mark Hammer; Stephen Bagley; Charu Aggarwal; Joshua Bauml; Arun C Nachiappan; Charles B Simone; Corey Langer; Sharyn I Katz
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 4.  Immunotherapy and the role of imaging.

Authors:  Brett W Carter; Priya R Bhosale; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Stephen Ansell; Larry Schwartz; Leo I Gordon; Ranjana Advani; Heather A Jacene; Axel Hoos; Sally F Barrington; Philippe Armand
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers of response to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Shien; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Immune-related response assessment during PD-1 inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Emily S Chambers; Anika E Adeni; Hiroto Hatabu; Pasi A Jänne; F Stephen Hodi; Mark M Awad
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 13.751

10.  Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST.

Authors:  Lucas Goldfarb; Boris Duchemann; Kader Chouahnia; Laurent Zelek; Michael Soussan
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  25 in total

1.  Evaluating response to immunotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT: where do we stand?

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Michel De Pontdeville; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  F18-FDG PET/CT imaging early predicts pathologic complete response to induction chemoimmunotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: preliminary single-center analysis of the checkrad-cd8 trial.

Authors:  M Hecht; S Semrau; M Beck; J Hartwich; M Eckstein; D Schmidt; A O Gostian; S Müller; S Rutzner; U S Gaipl; J von der Grün; T Illmer; M G Hautmann; G Klautke; J Döscher; T Brunner; B Tamaskovics; A Hartmann; H Iro; T Kuwert; R Fietkau
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  18FDG PET Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma Treated with First-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Alexia Rivas; Julie Delyon; Antoine Martineau; Estelle Blanc; Clara Allayous; Laetitia Da Meda; Pascal Merlet; Céleste Lebbé; Barouyr Baroudjian; Laetitia Vercellino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Progress and future prospective of FDG-PET/CT imaging combined with optimized procedures in lung cancer: toward precision medicine.

Authors:  Haoyue Guo; Kandi Xu; Guangxin Duan; Ling Wen; Yayi He
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  [Application of Neoadjuvant Immuno-chemotherapy in NSCLC].

Authors:  Si Chen; Zerui Zhao; Hao Long
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 6.  A Review of the Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status and 18F-FDG Metabolic Activity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Maoqing Jiang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yan Chen; Ping Chen; Xiuyu Guo; Lijuan Ma; Qiaoling Gao; Weiqi Mei; Jingfeng Zhang; Jianjun Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Baseline metabolic tumor volume as a strong predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD1 inhibitors: a prospective study.

Authors:  David Chardin; Marie Paquet; Renaud Schiappa; Jacques Darcourt; Caroline Bailleux; Michel Poudenx; Aurélie Sciazza; Marius Ilie; Jonathan Benzaquen; Nicolas Martin; Josiane Otto; Olivier Humbert
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 8.  Immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of atypical responses after immunotherapy.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Cesare Maino; Maria Ragusi; Marco Porta; Davide Gandola; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Teresa Paola Giandola; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Predictive value of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET in the early response to anti-programmed death-1 therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Sato; Yukihiro Umeda; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Tetsuya Mori; Miwa Morikawa; Masaki Anzai; Yuko Waseda; Maiko Kadowaki; Yasushi Kiyono; Hidehiko Okazawa; Tamotsu Ishizuka
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 13.751

Review 10.  PET/CT imaging for tumour response assessment to immunotherapy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Marcus Unterrainer; Michael Ruzicka; Matthias P Fabritius; Lena M Mittlmeier; Michael Winkelmann; Johannes Rübenthaler; Matthias Brendel; Marion Subklewe; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Jens Ricke; Wolfgang G Kunz; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.