Amy Munchhof1,2, Rachel Gruber3, Kathleen A Lane4, Na Bo4, Nicholas A Rattray5,3,6,7. 1. Department of General Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. ammunchh@iupui.edu. 2. Hospital Medicine Eskenazi Medical Group, Eskenazi Health Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA. ammunchh@iupui.edu. 3. Regenstrief Institute Inc., Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. Department of General Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 7. Department of Anthropology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ineffective transitions of care continue to be a source of risk for patients. Although there has been widespread implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, little is currently known about hospitalists' and primary care providers' (PCPs) direct communication preferences at discharge using messaging capabilities in a shared EMR system. OBJECTIVE: We examined how hospitalists and PCPs with a shared EMR prefer to directly communicate at the time of hospital discharge by identifying preferred modes, information prioritization, challenges, facilitators, and proposed solutions. DESIGN: A sequential, explanatory mixed methods study with surveys and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight academic hospitalists and 63 PCPs working in outpatient clinics in a single safety net hospital system with a shared EMR. MAIN APPROACH: Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization and a mixture of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: PCPs preferred direct communication at discharge through a message within the EMR while hospitalists preferred a message within the EMR and email. Qualitative results identified key themes related to patient care and direct communication: value of direct communication, safety, social determinants of health, and clinical judgment. Both groups prioritized direct communication for high-risk medications, pending and follow-up studies, and high-risk patients that hospitalists were concerned about. Overall, both hospitalists and PCPs reported that ensuring patient safety, flagging patients with social challenges, and expressing concerns about patients based on clinical judgment were key communication priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists and primary care providers report considerable overlap in preferences for direct communication at the time of hospital discharge through a shared EMR. Specifically, both groups reported similar concerns regarding patient safety and continuity during transitions. Direct messaging within the EMR could enable "closed loop" communication that helps ensure safe transitions of care for high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Ineffective transitions of care continue to be a source of risk for patients. Although there has been widespread implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, little is currently known about hospitalists' and primary care providers' (PCPs) direct communication preferences at discharge using messaging capabilities in a shared EMR system. OBJECTIVE: We examined how hospitalists and PCPs with a shared EMR prefer to directly communicate at the time of hospital discharge by identifying preferred modes, information prioritization, challenges, facilitators, and proposed solutions. DESIGN: A sequential, explanatory mixed methods study with surveys and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight academic hospitalists and 63 PCPs working in outpatient clinics in a single safety net hospital system with a shared EMR. MAIN APPROACH: Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Interviews were analyzed using immersion/crystallization and a mixture of inductive and deductive thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: PCPs preferred direct communication at discharge through a message within the EMR while hospitalists preferred a message within the EMR and email. Qualitative results identified key themes related to patient care and direct communication: value of direct communication, safety, social determinants of health, and clinical judgment. Both groups prioritized direct communication for high-risk medications, pending and follow-up studies, and high-risk patients that hospitalists were concerned about. Overall, both hospitalists and PCPs reported that ensuring patient safety, flagging patients with social challenges, and expressing concerns about patients based on clinical judgment were key communication priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalists and primary care providers report considerable overlap in preferences for direct communication at the time of hospital discharge through a shared EMR. Specifically, both groups reported similar concerns regarding patient safety and continuity during transitions. Direct messaging within the EMR could enable "closed loop" communication that helps ensure safe transitions of care for high-risk patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
discharge communication; hospitalists; primary care providers; transitions
Authors: L Halasyamani; S Kripalani; E Coleman; J Schnipper; C van Walraven; J Nagamine; P Torcson; T Bookwalter; T Budnitz; D Manning Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Paul M Robelia; Deanne T Kashiwagi; Sarah M Jenkins; James S Newman; Atsushi Sorita Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2017 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Brian G Arndt; John W Beasley; Michelle D Watkinson; Jonathan L Temte; Wen-Jan Tuan; Christine A Sinsky; Valerie J Gilchrist Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: JoAnna K Leyenaar; Lora Bergert; Leah A Mallory; Richard Engel; Caroline Rassbach; Mark Shen; Tess Woehrlen; David Cooperberg; Daniel Coghlin Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Frank LeFevre; Christopher O Phillips; Mark V Williams; Preetha Basaviah; David W Baker Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ann S O'Malley; Joy M Grossman; Genna R Cohen; Nicole M Kemper; Hoangmai H Pham Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Chaim M Bell; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Andrew D Auerbach; Peter J Kaboli; Tosha B Wetterneck; David V Gonzales; Vineet M Arora; James X Zhang; David O Meltzer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sherri Adams; Madison Beatty; Clara Moore; Arti Desai; Leah Bartlett; Erin Culbert; Eyal Cohen; Jennifer Stinson; Julia Orkin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Camila Almeida de Oliveira; Bernardete Weber; Jair Lício Ferreira Dos Santos; Miriane Lucindo Zucoloto; Lisa Laredo de Camargo; Ana Carolina Guidorizzi Zanetti; Magdalena Rzewuska; João Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura Esteve-Matalí; Ingrid Vargas; Franco Amigo; Pere Plaja; Francesc Cots; Erick F Mayer; Joan-Manuel Pérez-Castejón; María-Luisa Vázquez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390