Literature DB >> 27594085

Higher critical shoulder angle increases the risk of retear after rotator cuff repair.

Grant H Garcia1, Joseph N Liu2, Ryan M Degen2, Christine C Johnson2, Alexandra C Wong2, David M Dines2, Lawrence V Gulotta2, Joshua S Dines2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No evaluation has been done on the relationship of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) with retear after rotator cuff repair. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a higher CSA is associated with retear after rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 76 patients who had undergone rotator cuff repair with postoperative ultrasound examination. Ultrasound findings were graded no retear (NT), partial-thickness (PT) retear, or full-thickness (FT) retear. Preoperative radiographs were used to measure CSA, glenoid inclination, lateral acromion angle, and acromion index.
RESULTS: Average age was 61.9 years (45.3-74.9 years). On ultrasound examination, 57 shoulders (74.0%) had NT, 11 (14.2%) had PT retears, and 8 (10.3%) had FT retears. There was no significant difference in retear rate by age, gender, or tension of repair. Average CSA was significantly lower for the NT group at 34.3° ± 2.9° than for the FT group at 38.6° ± 3.5° (P < .01). If CSA was >38°, the odds ratio of having an FT retear was 14.8 (P < .01). In addition, higher CSA inversely correlated with postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (P < .03). Average glenoid inclination was significantly lower in the NT group at 12.3° ± 2.7° compared with 17.3° ± 2.6° in the FT group (P < .01). If glenoid inclination was >14, the odds ratio of having a FT retear was 15.0 (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: At short-term follow-up, higher CSA significantly increased the risk of an FT retear after rotator cuff repair. Also, increasing CSA correlated with worse postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. This radiographic marker may help manage expectations for rotator cuff tear patients.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical shoulder angle; glenoid inclination; lateral acromion index; retear; rotator cuff repair; rotator cuff tear

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27594085     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  26 in total

1.  The association between a low critical shoulder angle and SLAP lesions.

Authors:  Thilo Patzer; Nina Wimmer; Pablo Emilio Verde; Martin Hufeland; Ruediger Krauspe; Hannes Kenji Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  High performance of critical shoulder angle for diagnosing rotator cuff tears on radiographs.

Authors:  Jae Gwang Song; Seong Jong Yun; Young Woong Song; Sun Hwa Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Lateral acromioplasty cannot sufficiently reduce the critical shoulder angle if preoperatively measured over 40°.

Authors:  Manuel Ignacio Olmos; Achilleas Boutsiadis; John Swan; Paul Brossard; Renaud Barthelemy; Philippe Delsol; Johannes Barth
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Critical shoulder angle: what do radiologists need to know?

Authors:  Amélie Loriaud; Sylvain Bise; Philippe Meyer; Anselme Billaud; Benjamin Dallaudiere; Alain Silvestre; Lionel Pesquer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Multimodality imaging of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lionel Pesquer; Sophie Borghol; Philippe Meyer; Mickael Ropars; Benjamin Dallaudière; Pierre Abadie
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Radiographic shoulder parameters and their relationship to outcomes following rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Musa B Zaid; Nathan M Young; Valentina Pedoia; Brian T Feeley; C Benjamin Ma; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-10

Review 7.  Does the critical shoulder angle influence retear and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Mingtao Zhang; Zhitao Yang; Borong Zhang; Jin Jiang; Xiangdong Yun
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Lateral Acromioplasty With the Aim of Reducing the Critical Shoulder Angle Using Techniques Based on the Lateral Acromial Border Result in Larger-Than-Necessary Resections.

Authors:  Geoffrey C S Smith; Michael Sawang
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-28

9.  Position of the acromioclavicular joint and relation to the critical shoulder angle in shoulders with rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Hannes Kubo; Fariha Piela; Thilo Patzer; Markus Konieczny; Erik Schiffner; Pascal Jungbluth; Rüdiger Krauspe; Martin Hufeland
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-28

10.  Re-tears after rotator cuff repair: Current concepts review.

Authors:  Avanthi Mandaleson
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.