Literature DB >> 36194254

Does the critical shoulder angle influence retear and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tao Liu1, Mingtao Zhang1, Zhitao Yang1, Borong Zhang1, Jin Jiang2, Xiangdong Yun3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the correlation between increased critical shoulder angle (CSA) and higher retear rates and functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases published before January 2022 were comprehensively searched. Two reviewers independently reviewed the titles and abstracts using the specified criteria. Studies were included if the authors clearly described the correlation between the CSA and rotator cuff repair. Data on patient characteristics, mean CSA, retear rate, and the functional score was pooled from the selected articles. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1 software, 2020 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).
RESULTS: Eleven articles involving 1449 patients from 7 countries were included. The ages of the patients ranged from 45 to 75 years. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 96 months. The mean CSA was greater in the retear group than in the non-retear group after ARCR (mean difference 2.73°; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-4.77) (p = 0.009). Three studies evaluated the association between increased CSA and the postoperative retear rate. All three studies showed a higher postoperative retear rate in patients with an increased CSA (odds ratio 5.35; 95% CI 2.02-14.15; p = 0.0007). No association was found between CSA and Constant-Murley (Constant), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), or Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores during the follow-up period of 24-96 months (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that CSA correlates highly with rotator cuff retear after ARCR. In addition, the postoperative retear rate of the rotator cuff increased with increased CSA. CSA appeared to not affect worse functional outcomes in patients after ARCR.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical shoulder angle; Functional outcome; Retear; Rotator cuff repair

Year:  2022        PMID: 36194254     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04640-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  41 in total

1.  Trans-tendon suture bridge rotator cuff repair with tenotomized pathologic biceps tendon augmentation in high-grade PASTA lesions.

Authors:  Jae-Jung Jeong; Sang-Eun Park; Jong-Hun Ji; Hwan-Hee Lee; Se-Hoon Jung; Bong-Seok Choi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Do functional outcomes and cuff integrity correlate after single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Mohamed H Sobhy; Ahmed Hany Khater; Medhat Ragab Hassan; Ossama El Shazly
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-13

3.  Factors Predictive of Healing in Large Rotator Cuff Tears: Is It Possible to Predict Retear Preoperatively?

Authors:  Ho Yeon Jeong; Hwan Jin Kim; Yoon Sang Jeon; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Shoulder Rotator Cuff Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Semantic Analyses of Recommendations.

Authors:  Patrick Doiron-Cadrin; Simon Lafrance; Marie Saulnier; Émie Cournoyer; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Joseph-Omer Dyer; Pierre Frémont; Clermont Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Michel Tousignant; Annie Rochette; Véronique Lowry; Nathalie J Bureau; Martin Lamontagne; Marie-France Coutu; Patrick Lavigne; François Desmeules
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation.

Authors:  Konstantin Hug; Christian Gerhardt; Hendrik Haneveld; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Shin; Seung-Hwan Kook; Nandan Rao; Myeong-Jae Seo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Evaluation of critical shoulder angle and acromion index in patients with anterior shoulder instability and rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Nazım Karahan; Barış Yılmaz; Ahmet Öztermeli; Murat Kaya; Serda Duman; Esin Derin Çiçek
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 8.  Advances in biologic augmentation for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Sahishnu Patel; Anthony P Gualtieri; Helen H Lu; William N Levine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  The Effect of Patient Characteristics and Comorbidities on the Rate of Revision Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Evan A O'Donnell; Michael C Fu; Alex E White; Samuel A Taylor; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines; Russell F Warren; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Acromion and glenoid shape: Why are they important predictive factors for the future of our shoulders?

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.