Literature DB >> 29445933

Multimodality imaging of subacromial impingement syndrome.

Lionel Pesquer1, Sophie Borghol2, Philippe Meyer2, Mickael Ropars3, Benjamin Dallaudière2, Pierre Abadie4.   

Abstract

Subacromial impingement syndrome results from irritation of the tendons of the rotator cuff muscles in the subacromial space and may manifest as a range of pathologies. However, subacromial impingement is a dynamic condition for which imaging reveals predisposing factors but no pathognomonic indicators. Also, the usual imaging features of subacromial impingement may be seen in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Therefore, imaging is able to detect tears and describe the risk factors of impingement but cannot confirm subacromial impingement. Radiographs allow assessment of the morphology of the acromion and its lateral extension by means of the acromial index and the critical shoulder angle, which may increase in cases of subacromial impingement. Ultrasound is necessary to evaluate a tendon tear and is the only tool that provides dynamic information, which is essential to assessing dynamic conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the assessment of associated intraarticular abnormalities, joint effusion, and bone marrow edema. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of subacromial impingement and discuss recent advances in the imaging of subacromial impingement and the role of radiography, ultrasound, and MRI in differentiating normal from pathologic findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Impingement; MRI; Shoulder; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29445933     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-2875-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  58 in total

1.  3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Thomas Magee; David Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the coraco-acromial ligament.

Authors:  T K Blanchard; P W Bearcroft
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 3.  Acromiohumeral distance measurement in rotator cuff tendinopathy: is there a reliable, clinically applicable method? A systematic review.

Authors:  Karen M McCreesh; James M Crotty; Jeremy S Lewis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  The influence of coracoacromial arch anatomy on rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; F J Kummer; F Cuomo; J Simon; S Rosenblum; N Katz
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Ultrasound of the shoulder: asymptomatic findings in men.

Authors:  Gandikota Girish; Lucas G Lobo; Jon A Jacobson; Yoav Morag; Bruce Miller; David A Jamadar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparison of the critical shoulder angle in radiographs and computed tomography.

Authors:  Samy Bouaicha; Christine Ehrmann; Ksenija Slankamenac; William D Regan; Beat K Moor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Image-guided versus blind glucocorticoid injection for shoulder pain.

Authors:  Jason E Bloom; Adam Rischin; Renea V Johnston; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

8.  Relationship of individual scapular anatomy and degenerative rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Beat K Moor; Karl Wieser; Ksenija Slankamenac; Christian Gerber; Samy Bouaicha
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral.

Authors:  L Linsell; J Dawson; K Zondervan; P Rose; T Randall; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered.

Authors:  Mário Lenza; Rachelle Buchbinder; Yemisi Takwoingi; Renea V Johnston; Nigel Ca Hanchard; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-24
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Critical shoulder angle: what do radiologists need to know?

Authors:  Amélie Loriaud; Sylvain Bise; Philippe Meyer; Anselme Billaud; Benjamin Dallaudiere; Alain Silvestre; Lionel Pesquer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Effect of the acromial inferolateral tilt on subacromial impingement syndrome: a retrospective magnetic resonance imaging assessment.

Authors:  André Vaz; Camila Pietroski Reifegerste; Cesar Rodrigo Trippia; Lucas Savaris Linhares; Fábio Bordin Trindade; José Eduardo Thomaz
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

3.  Acromial morphology and morphometry associated with subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Thawanthorn Chaimongkhol; Sirapat Benjachaya; Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 4.  Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  William Palmer; Laura Bancroft; Fiona Bonar; Jung-Ah Choi; Anne Cotten; James F Griffith; Philip Robinson; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Discriminative and convergent validity of strain elastography for detecting tendinopathy within the supraspinatus tendon: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karen Brage; John Hjarbaek; Eleanor Boyle; Kim Gordon Ingwersen; Per Kjaer; Birgit Juul-Kristensen
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-24

6.  Shoulder impingement: various risk factors for supraspinatus tendon tear: A case group study.

Authors:  Rani G Ahmad
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.