Literature DB >> 27593977

Optimized AIR and investigational MOLLI cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequences produce similar intra-scan repeatability in patients at 3T.

KyungPyo Hong1,2, Jeremy Collins3, Daniel C Lee3,4, Jane E Wilcox4, Michael Markl3,5, James Carr3, Daniel Kim6,7.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to improve the precision of arrhythmia-insensitive rapid (AIR) cardiac T1 mapping through pulse sequence optimization and then evaluate the intra-scan repeatability in patients at 3T against investigational modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping. In the first development phase (five human subjects), we implemented and tested centric-pair k-space ordering to suppress image artifacts associated with eddy currents. In the second development phase (15 human subjects), we determined optimal flip angles to reduce the measurement variation in T1 maps. In the validation phase (35 patients), we compared the intra-scan repeatability between investigational MOLLI and optimized AIR. In 23 cardiac planes, conventional centric k-space ordering (3.7%) produced significantly (p < 0.05) more outliers as a fraction of left ventricular cavity area than optimal centric k-space ordering (1.4%). In 15 human subjects, for each of four types of measurement (native myocardial T1 , native blood T1 , post-contrast myocardial T1 , post-contrast blood T1 ), flip angles of 55-65° produced lower measurement variation while producing results that are not significantly different from those produced with the previously used flip angle of 35° (p > 0.89, intra-class correlation coefficient ≥ 0.95 for all four measurement types). Compared with investigational MOLLI (coefficient of repeatability, CR = 40.0, 77.2, 26.5, and 25.9 ms for native myocardial, native blood, post-contrast myocardial, and post-contrast blood T1 , and 2.0% for extracellular volume (ECV) measurements, respectively), optimized AIR (CR = 54.3, 89.7, 30.5, and 14.7 ms for native myocardial, native blood, post-contrast myocardial, and post-contrast blood T1 , and 1.6% for ECV measurements, respectively) produced similar absolute intra-scan repeatability in all 35 patients in the validation phase. High repeatability is critically important for longitudinal studies, where the goal is to monitor physiologic/pathologic changes, not measurement variation. Optimized AIR cardiac T1 mapping is likely to yield high scan-retest repeatability for pre-clinical and clinical applications.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac T1 mapping; diffuse myocardial fibrosis; flip angle optimization; image artifacts; k-space ordering; precision; repeatability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27593977      PMCID: PMC5065359          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  22 in total

1.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA) for myocardial T(1) mapping.

Authors:  Kelvin Chow; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Jordin D Green; Joseph J Pagano; Matthias G Friedrich; Richard B Thompson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Flexible cardiac T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker acquisition with saturation recovery.

Authors:  Ting Song; Jeffrey A Stainsby; Vincent B Ho; Maureen N Hood; Glenn S Slavin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Measurement of the distribution volume of gadopentetate dimeglumine at echo-planar MR imaging to quantify myocardial infarction: comparison with 99mTc-DTPA autoradiography in rats.

Authors:  H Arheden; M Saeed; C B Higgins; D W Gao; J Bremerich; R Wyttenbach; M W Dae; M F Wendland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  MOLLI and AIR T1 mapping pulse sequences yield different myocardial T1 and ECV measurements.

Authors:  KyungPyo Hong; Daniel Kim
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Hybrid adiabatic-rectangular pulse train for effective saturation of magnetization within the whole heart at 3 T.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Niels Oesingmann; Kellyanne McGorty
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping.

Authors:  Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold.

Authors:  Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  T1-mapping in the heart: accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Comprehensive validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of myocardial extracellular volume.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; Josephine H Naish; Paul Bishop; Glyn Coutts; David Clark; Sha Zhao; Simon G Ray; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Andrew S Flett; James C Moon; Andreas Greiser; Geoffrey J M Parker; Matthias Schmitt
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Towards accurate and precise T 1 and extracellular volume mapping in the myocardium: a guide to current pitfalls and their solutions.

Authors:  Donnie Cameron; Vassilios S Vassiliou; David M Higgins; Peter D Gatehouse
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Evaluation of Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery and Arrhythmia-Insensitive Rapid Cardiac T1 Mapping Pulse Sequences in Cardiomyopathy Patients.

Authors:  Sean Robison; KyungPyo Hong; Daniel Kim; Rachel Lloyd; Jay Ramchand; Emma Hornsey; Piyush Srivastava; Gerard Smith; Leighton Kearney; Ruth Lim
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Left ventricular extracellular volume expansion does not predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

Authors:  Suvai Gunasekaran; Daniel C Lee; Bradley P Knight; Jeremy D Collins; Lexiaozi Fan; Amar Trivedi; Ann B Ragin; James C Carr; Rod S Passman; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Left Ventricular Extracellular Volume Expansion Is Not Associated with Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Fibrillation-mediated Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Suvai Gunasekaran; Daniel C Lee; Bradley P Knight; Lexiaozi Fan; Jeremy D Collins; Kelvin Chow; James C Carr; Rod Passman; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 5.  The Road Toward Reproducibility of Parametric Mapping of the Heart: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Augustin C Ogier; Aurelien Bustin; Hubert Cochet; Juerg Schwitter; Ruud B van Heeswijk
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-06

6.  Non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance detection of myocardial fibrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Frank J Raucci; Meng Xu; Kristen George-Durrett; Kimberly Crum; James C Slaughter; David A Parra; Larry W Markham; Jonathan H Soslow
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.