| Literature DB >> 27589716 |
Dorothea Kaufmann1, Anudeep Kaur Dogra2, Ahmad Tahrani3, Florian Herrmann4, Michael Wink5.
Abstract
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is a common treatment for early stages of the most general form of dementia, Alzheimer's Disease (AD). In this study, methanol, dichloromethane and aqueous crude extracts from 80 Traditional Chinese Medical (TCM) plants were tested for their in vitro anti-acetylcholinesterase activity based on Ellman's colorimetric assay. All three extracts of Berberis bealei (formerly Mahonia bealei), Coptis chinensis and Phellodendron chinense, which contain numerous isoquinoline alkaloids, substantially inhibited AChE. The methanol and aqueous extracts of Coptis chinensis showed IC50 values of 0.031 µg/mL and 2.5 µg/mL, therefore having an up to 100-fold stronger AChE inhibitory activity than the already known AChE inhibitor galantamine (IC50 = 4.33 µg/mL). Combinations of individual alkaloids berberine, coptisine and palmatine resulted in a synergistic enhancement of ACh inhibition. Therefore, the mode of AChE inhibition of crude extracts of Coptis chinensis, Berberis bealei and Phellodendron chinense is probably due to of this synergism of isoquinoline alkaloids. All extracts were also tested for their cytotoxicity in COS7 cells and none of the most active extracts was cytotoxic at the concentrations which inhibit AChE. Based on these results it can be stated that some TCM plants inhibit AChE via synergistic interaction of their secondary metabolites. The possibility to isolate pure lead compounds from the crude extracts or to administer these as nutraceuticals or as cheap alternative to drugs in third world countries make TCM plants a versatile source of natural inhibitors of AChE.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s; Coptis; Traditional Chinese Medicine; acetylcholinesterase; acetylcholinesterase inhibitor; berberine; coptisine; isoquinoline alkaloids; natural products; palmatine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27589716 PMCID: PMC6273583 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21091161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
AChE inhibitory (AChEi) activity and cytotoxicity in COS7 cells of the most active TCM plant extracts. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; all experiments were carried out in triplicates and repeated independently. (AChE assay: n = 3; n = 9 for Coptis chinensis samples. Cytotoxicity: n = 3).
| Sample | IC50 AChE Inhibition (mg/mL) | IC50 COS7 (µg/mL) | Ratio IC50 COS7/AChE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.10 ± 4.89 | 35.37 ± 4.21 | 1.0 | |
| 9.99 ± 1.18 | 13.36 ± 1.76 | 1.3 | |
| 87.77 ± 4.11 | 270.0 ± 13.5 | 3.1 | |
| 0.031 ± 0.002 | 3.72 ± 0.74 | 120 | |
| 8.13 ± 0.90 | 39.57 ± 4.87 | 4.9 | |
| 2.5 ± 0.61 | 118.3 ± 7.4 | 47 | |
| 8.03 ± 0.98 | 85.52 ± 11.90 | 10 | |
| 6.34 ± 1.37 | 71.33 ± 6.87 | 11 | |
| 84.83 ± 1.84 | 282.9 ± 15.3 | 3.3 | |
| Berberine | 1.48 ± 0.07 | - | - |
| Coptisine | 1.27 ± 0.06 | - | - |
| Palmatine | 5.21 ± 0.48 | - | - |
| Physostigmine | 2.24 ± 0.27 | - | - |
| Galantamine | 4.33 ± 0.21 | - | - |
AChE inhibitory activity and cytoxicity in COS7 cells of TCM plant extracts.
| Family/Plant | Chinese Name | DNA | AChE (IC50 (µg/mL)) | COS7 (IC50 (µg/mL)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeOH | CH2Cl2 | H2O | MeOH | CH2Cl2 | H2O | |||
| Acanthaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Chuan Xin Lian | Family | NA | NA | NA | 344.7 ± 13.3 | 104.7 ± 5.2 | 255.6 ± 11.9 | |
| Amaranthaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ji Guan hua | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 28.43 ± 2.87 | 136.00 ± 8.40 | 263.9 ± 12.3 | |
| Apiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Chai Hu | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 358.7 ± 19.8 | 87.12 ± 3.67 | 15.60 ± 11.76 | |
| Nan Chai Hu | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 576.0 ± 31.2 | 67.41 ± 5.23 | 350.7 ± 17.5 | |
| Lei Gong Gen | Species | NA | NA | NA | 392.8 ± 78.2 | 64.97 ± 4.85 | 325.8 ± 12.1 | |
| Fang Feng | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 1575 ± 147 | 46.00 ± 2.64 | 153.0 ± 7.7 | |
| She Chuang Zi | Family | NA | NA | NA | 120.0 ± 11.7 | 37.02 ± 2.39 | 339.7 ± 11.1 | |
| Araliaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ci Wu Jia | Species | NA | NA | NA | 190.1 ± 18.4 | 61.49 ± 5.98 | 130.5 ± 7.5 | |
| Ren Shen | Species | NA | NA | NA | 510.8 ± 29.5 | 47.76 ± 5.82 | 151.7 ± 8.9 | |
| San Qi | Species | NA | NA | NA | 229.5 ± 19.5 | 6.47 ± 0.89 | 182.3 ± 9.1 | |
| Arecaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bing Lang | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 31.02 ± 2.69 | 117.02 ± 7.33 | 16.60 ± 2.01 | |
| Apogynaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Liao Diao Zhu | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 227.7 ± 16.9 | 114.25 ± 6.78 | 220.7 ± 7.6 | |
| Asparagaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Huan Jjing | Species | NA | NA | NA | 147.4 ±15.4 | 53.94 ± 4.67 | 298.4 ± 13.6 | |
| Asteraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Niu Bang | Species | NA | NA | NA | 1813 ± 225 | 344.25 ± 12.31 | 355.5 ± 12.6 | |
| Huang Hua Hao | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 201.1 ± 8.7 | 34.57 ± 3.18 | 288.6 ± 11.4 | |
| Yin Chen Hao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 215.4 ± 9.3 | 29.49 ± 2.56 | 201.9 ± 9.5 | |
| Ebu Shi Cao | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 54.21 ± 4.98 | 10.44 ± 1.70 | 55.64 ± 4.62 | |
| Ye Ju Hua | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 287.2 ± 9.8 | 63.58 ± 5.78 | 320.9 ± 14.3 | |
| Ju Hua | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 166.7 ± 8.4 | 42.88 ± 3.96 | 760.4 ± 28.3 | |
| Han Lian Cao | Species | NA | NA | NA | 186.1 ± 12.8 | 112.06 ± 9.65 | 291.7 ± 13.9 | |
| Qian Li Guang | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 126.2 ± 12.2 | 143.54 ± 9.64 | 114.2 ± 6.7 | |
| Xi Xian Cao | Family | NA | NA | NA | 84.4 ± 7.5 | 17.78 ± 1.94 | 159.2 ± 7.4 | |
| Pu Gong Ying | Species | NA | NA | NA | 485.3 ± 17 | 177.16 ± 8.45 | 156.9 ± 6.3 | |
| Berberidaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shi Da Gong Lao | Species | 34.10 ± 4.89 | 9.99 ± 1.18 | 87.77 ± 4.11 | 35.37 ± 4.21 | 13.36 ± 1.76 | 270.0 ± 13.5 | |
| Ba Jiao Lian | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 54.90 ± 4.69 | 49.95 ± 5.29 | 1276 ± 39 | |
| Yin Yang Huo | Species | NA | NA | NA | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 3.60 ± 0.56 | 140.8 ± 6.2 | |
| Brassicaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ban Langen | Family | NA | NA | NA | 324.4 ± 17.8 | 42.38 ± 4.54 | 557.2 ± 27.2 | |
| Daq Qing Ye | Family | NA | NA | NA | 90.62 ± 11.37 | 0.64 ± 0.07 | 93.51 ± 4.73 | |
| Ji Cai | Species | NA | NA | NA | 29.82 ± 3.87 | 120.82 ± 7.89 | 234.2 ± 11.6 | |
| Caprifoliaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ren Dong Teng | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 118.9 ± 12.8 | 58.99 ± 5.13 | 446.8 ± 21.2 | |
| Crassulacea | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hong Jing Tian | Species | NA | NA | NA | 87.42 ± 7.43 | 74.67 ± 6.54 | 61.97 ± 4.12 | |
| Cupressaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ce Bai Ye | Species | NA | NA | NA | 158.7 ± 12.4 | 21.80 ± 2.91 | 97.78 ± 56.53 | |
| Dryopteridaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Guang Zhong | Species | NA | NA | NA | 348.7 ± 26.5 | 132.13 ± 5.03 | 30.42 ± 2.45 | |
| Ephedraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ma Huang | Species | NA | NA | NA | 36.76 ± 3.93 | 41.82 ± 4.85 | 69.15 ± 5.98 | |
| Equisetaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mu Zei | Species | NA | NA | NA | 243.5 ± 17.1 | 35.76 ± 3.50 | 265.9 ± 12.3 | |
| Euphorbiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ba Dou | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 222.1 ± 18.4 | 225.98 ± 10.69 | 166.2 ± 5.7 | |
| Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ji Gu Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 733.1 ± 42.6 | 129.45 ± 7.65 | 575.2 ± 24.4 | |
| Er Cha | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 34.86 ± 2.55 | 31.56 ± 3.78 | 35.71 ± 3.86 | |
| Jue Ming Zi | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 75.95 ± 6.50 | 189.15 ± 8.43 | 481.3 ± 19.4 | |
| Guang Jin Qian Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 104.1 ± 9.35 | 139.86 ± 5.50 | 333.5 ± 13.9 | |
| Gan Cao | Species | NA | 333 ± 9 | NA | 126.8 ± 11.2 | 6.97 ± 1.43 | 583.9 ± 21.3 | |
| Ji Xue Teng | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 54.87 ± 4.89 | 154.66 ± 6.72 | 16.63 ± 1.32 | |
| n/a | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 352.0 ± 29.5 | 259.37 ± 9.39 | 857.3 ± 26.8 | |
| Geraniaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Loa Guan Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 169.8 ± 16.4 | 17.02 ± 1.80 | 225.8 ± 9.6 | |
| Ginkgoaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yin Xing | Species | NA | 1003 ± 15 | NA | 260.1 ± 24.21 | 15.40 ± 1.34 | 450.8 ± 21.3 | |
| Hypericaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tian Ji Huang | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 100.9 ± 9.0 | 10.83 ± 0.53 | 151.8 ± 13.9 | |
| Iridaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| She Gan | Species | NA | NA | NA | 319.5 ± 28.4 | 89.25 ± 7.32 | 222.1 ± 12.7 | |
| Lamiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bo He | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 147.8 ± 12.3 | 34.16 ± 3.35 | 285.7 ± 14.6 | |
| Xia Ku Cao | Species | NA | NA | NA | 494.5 ± 45.7 | 90.48 ± 6.47 | 21.57 ± 2.90 | |
| Huang Qin | Species | NA | NA | NA | 28.88 ± 2.65 | 287.98 ± 8.93 | 46.41 ± 3.96 | |
| Lauraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Gui Zhi | Genus | 1027 ± 16 | 953 ± 12 | NA | 108.4 ± 9.8 | 23.20 ± 2.76 | 453.9 ± 21.5 | |
| Loranthaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sang Ji Sheng | Family | NA | NA | NA | 378.2 ± 32.4 | 68.65 ± 7.42 | 181.7 ± 9.2 | |
| Lythraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shi Liu | Species | NA | NA | NA | 218.6 ± 16.3 | 126.64 ± 8.64 | 8.608 ± 1.432 | |
| Magnoliaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hou Pu | Species | 320 ± 9 | 183 ± 6 | NA | 13.12 ± 0.97 | 5.45 ± 1.37 | 73.01 ± 5.42 | |
| Melanthiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Qi Ye Yi Zhi Hua | Species | NA | NA | NA | 5.52 ± 0.39 | 24.07 ± 2.82 | 38.49 ± 2.47 | |
| Myrisinaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Jin Qian Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 436.3 ± 36.6 | 137.39 ± 6.39 | 152.2 ± 8.4 | |
| Myrtaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| An Shu | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 15.21 ± 0.62 | n/a | 94.19 ± 5.99 | |
| Oleaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Qin Pi | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 38.72 ± 6.59 | 39.23 ± 4.11 | 193.2 ± 11.6 | |
| Ophioglossacea | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yi Zhi Jian | Species | NA | NA | NA | 68.70 ± 11.42 | 62.87 ± 6.58 | 344.0 ± 13.4 | |
| Orchideaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Shi Hu | Species | NA | NA | NA | 61.65 ± 15.36 | 25.74 ± 2.94 | 104.3 ± 6.3 | |
| Paeoniaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Chi Shao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 309.8 ± 24.7 | 34.06 ± 4.60 | 148.2 ± 6.1 | |
| Pedaliaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| n/a | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 217.2 ± 18.53 | 15.89 ± 2.25 | 242.9 ± 12.6 | |
| Poaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yun Xian Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 17.88 ± 1.16 | 114.57 ± 8.63 | 257.8 ± 13.2 | |
| Polygonaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| He Shou Wu | Genus | NA | 523 ± 11 | NA | 48.87 ± 4.62 | 107.74 ± 7.94 | 61.32 ± 5.61 | |
| Hu Zhang | Species | NA | NA | NA | 19.59 ± 2.23 | 2.85 ± 0.87 | 39.81 ± 3.84 | |
| Da Huang | Species | NA | NA | NA | 3.53 ± 0.80 | n/a | 51.59 ± 5.48 | |
| Ranunculaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Huang Lian | Species | 0.031 ± 0.002 | 8.13 ± 0.90 | 2.5 ± 0.61 | 3.72 ± 0.74 | 39.57 ± 4.87 | 118.3 ± 7.4 | |
| Rosaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yu Ji Hua | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 36.76 ± 3.45 | 141.55 ± 9.52 | 24.32 ± 2.86 | |
| Jin Ying Zi | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 13.30 ± 2.21 | 151.80 ± 9.79 | 93.61 ± 7.30 | |
| Di Yu | Species | NA | NA | NA | 1100 ± 97 | 26.77 ± 3.58 | 20.55 ± 2.59 | |
| Rubiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bai Hua She She Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 418.1 ± 34.8 | 45.35 ± 4.12 | 158.7 ± 9.2 | |
| Rutaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| San Cha Ku | Family | NA | NA | NA | 5.13 ± 0.75 | 42.06 ± 4.65 | 419.3 ± 19.4 | |
| Wu Zhu Yu | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 427.7 ± 37.2 | 8.78 ± 1.78 | 1176 ± 34 | |
| Huang Bai | Genus | 8.03 ± 0.98 | 6.34 ± 1.37 | 84.83 ± 1.84 | 85.52 ± 11.90 | 71.33 ± 6.87 | 282.9 ± 15.3 | |
| Saururaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Yu Xing Cao | Species | NA | NA | NA | 63.95 ± 5.98 | 48.26 ± 5.19 | 633.3 ± 17.8 | |
| Schisandraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Zi Ging Pi | Species | NA | NA | NA | 43.92 ± 2.59 | 1.88 ± 0.94 | 6.812 ± 1.678 | |
| Selaginellaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Juan Bai | Species | NA | NA | NA | 150.9 ± 13.34 | 98.83 ± 8.62 | 103.9 ± 6. | |
| Valerianaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Bai Jiang | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 15.96 ± 2.69 | 38.77 ± 2.87 | 38.49 ± 3.73 | |
| Verbenaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ma Bian Cao | Species | NA | NA | NA | 37.76 ± 4.42 | 145.91 ± 9.06 | 93.94 ± 5.97 | |
| Violaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Zi Hua Di Ding Cao | Genus | NA | NA | NA | 19.19 ± 1.45 | 60.87 ± 5.49 | 135.6 ± 6.4 | |
| Zingiberaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hong Dou Kou | n/a | NA | NA | NA | 53.48 ± 4.92 | 5.76 ± 1.53 | 952.2 ± 31.2 | |
| Yi Zhi Ren | Species | NA | NA | NA | 110.2 ± 9.5 | 30.40 ± 2.81 | 105.8 ± 7.5 | |
All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; all experiments were carried out in triplicates and repeated independently. (AChE assay: n = 3; n = 9 for Coptis chinensis samples. Cytotoxicity: n = 3). Samples were considered to be inactive (NA) in the AChE assay if they showed less than 80% inhibition of AChE activity at a concentration of 1250 µg/mL. For some plants not all extracts could be prepared, these samples are marked n/a (not analysed).
Figure 1HPLC-MS total ion current chromatogram of a methanol extract of Coptis chinensis. Peaks: 1: Tetradehydroscoulerine / tetrahydrocheilanthifolinium (m/z = 322); 2: columbamine (m/z = 338); 3: epiberberine (m/z = 336); 4: coptisine (m/z = 320); 5: palmatine (m/z = 352); 6: berberine (m/z = 336).
AChE inhibitory activity of combinations of berberine, coptisine and palmatine. The 1st alkaloid (italics) was diluted in 1:1 steps; the 2nd alkaloid was used in a steady IC30 concentration. All IC values are stated in (µg/mL). A combination index (CI) < 1.0 (bold) indicates synergism. All data is shown as mean ± SD from three independent experiments, each carried out as a triplicate.
| Sample | IC10 | IC20 | IC30 | IC40 | IC50 | IC60 | IC70 | IC80 | IC90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.76 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 2.02 | 2.85 | 4.32 | 8.09 | |
| 0.051 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.4 | 0.59 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3.22 | |
| CI | 1.26 | 1.92 | 3.79 | ||||||
| 0.031 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.37 | 0.59 | 0.96 | 1.75 | 4.33 | |
| CI | 1.81 | ||||||||
| 0.027 | 0.066 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.78 | 1.42 | 3.47 | |
| CI | 1.32 | 2.24 | 5.1 | ||||||
| 0.6 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 1.11 | 1.27 | 1.46 | 1.69 | 2.04 | 2.68 | |
| 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 1 | 1.49 | 2.3 | 3.91 | 8.67 | |
| CI | 1.04 | 1.49 | 2.11 | 2.98 | 4.39 | 7.06 | 14.6 | ||
| 0.13 | 0.3 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 1.23 | 1.86 | 2.9 | 5.01 | 11.4 | |
| CI | 1.33 | 1.82 | 2.57 | 3.93 | 7.6 | ||||
| 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.47 | 0.73 | 1.08 | 1.6 | 2.44 | 4.11 | 8.97 | |
| CI | 1.25 | 1.83 | 2.59 | 3.67 | 5.37 | 8.63 | 17.8 | ||
| 1.73 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.25 | 5.21 | 6.39 | 7.97 | 10.4 | 15.7 | |
| 0.25 | 0.67 | 1.28 | 2.18 | 3.54 | 5.77 | 9.81 | 18.7 | 49.6 | |
| CI | 1.14 | 2.06 | 3.38 | 5.34 | 8.49 | 14.1 | 26.4 | 68.5 | |
| 0.37 | 0.96 | 1.82 | 3.08 | 5 | 8.11 | 13.7 | 26.1 | 68.8 | |
| CI | 1.1 | 1.49 | 1.97 | 2.6 | 3.54 | 5.13 | 8.99 | ||
| 0.43 | 1.06 | 1.95 | 3.2 | 5.05 | 7.97 | 13.1 | 24 | 59.8 | |
| CI | 1.27 | 2.92 | 5.19 | 8.33 | 12.9 | 20.12 | 32.7 | 59.2 | 145 |
Figure 2AChE inhibitory effect and synergistic effects of berberine in combination with coptisine and palmatine. The combination of berberine with other alkaloids inhibits ACh stronger than berberine alone (top); The combination index (CI) increases with higher concentrations of berberine (bottom). Data is shown as mean ± SD from three individual experiments, each carried out in triplicates.
Figure 3Alkaloids contained in Coptis chinensis.