Chung Chan1, Hui Liu2, Yariv Grobshtein3, Mitchel R Stacy4, Albert J Sinusas5, Chi Liu1. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. 2. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 and Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100084, China. 3. GE Healthcare, Haifa 3910101, Israel. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. 5. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 and Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Partial volume correction (PVC) methods typically improve quantification at the expense of increased image noise and reduced reproducibility. In this study, the authors developed a novel voxel-based PVC method that incorporates anatomical knowledge to improve quantification while suppressing noise for cardiac SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: In the proposed method, the SPECT images were first reconstructed using anatomical-based maximum a posteriori (AMAP) with Bowsher's prior to penalize noise while preserving boundaries. A sequential voxel-by-voxel PVC approach (Yang's method) was then applied on the AMAP reconstruction using a template response. This template response was obtained by forward projecting a template derived from a contrast-enhanced CT image, and then reconstructed using AMAP to model the partial volume effects (PVEs) introduced by both the system resolution and the smoothing applied during reconstruction. To evaluate the proposed noise suppressed PVC (NS-PVC), the authors first simulated two types of cardiac SPECT studies: a (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scan and a (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cell (RBC) scan on a dedicated cardiac multiple pinhole SPECT/CT at both high and low count levels. The authors then applied the proposed method on a canine equilibrium blood pool study following injection with (99m)Tc-RBCs at different count levels by rebinning the list-mode data into shorter acquisitions. The proposed method was compared to MLEM reconstruction without PVC, two conventional PVC methods, including Yang's method and multitarget correction (MTC) applied on the MLEM reconstruction, and AMAP reconstruction without PVC. RESULTS: The results showed that the Yang's method improved quantification, however, yielded increased noise and reduced reproducibility in the regions with higher activity. MTC corrected for PVE on high count data with amplified noise, although yielded the worst performance among all the methods tested on low-count data. AMAP effectively suppressed noise and reduced the spill-in effect in the low activity regions. However it was unable to reduce the spill-out effect in high activity regions. NS-PVC yielded superior performance in terms of both quantitative assessment and visual image quality while improving reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that NS-PVC may be a promising PVC algorithm for application in low-dose protocols, and in gated and dynamic cardiac studies with low counts.
PURPOSE: Partial volume correction (PVC) methods typically improve quantification at the expense of increased image noise and reduced reproducibility. In this study, the authors developed a novel voxel-based PVC method that incorporates anatomical knowledge to improve quantification while suppressing noise for cardiac SPECT/CT imaging. METHODS: In the proposed method, the SPECT images were first reconstructed using anatomical-based maximum a posteriori (AMAP) with Bowsher's prior to penalize noise while preserving boundaries. A sequential voxel-by-voxel PVC approach (Yang's method) was then applied on the AMAP reconstruction using a template response. This template response was obtained by forward projecting a template derived from a contrast-enhanced CT image, and then reconstructed using AMAP to model the partial volume effects (PVEs) introduced by both the system resolution and the smoothing applied during reconstruction. To evaluate the proposed noise suppressed PVC (NS-PVC), the authors first simulated two types of cardiac SPECT studies: a (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scan and a (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cell (RBC) scan on a dedicated cardiac multiple pinhole SPECT/CT at both high and low count levels. The authors then applied the proposed method on a canine equilibrium blood pool study following injection with (99m)Tc-RBCs at different count levels by rebinning the list-mode data into shorter acquisitions. The proposed method was compared to MLEM reconstruction without PVC, two conventional PVC methods, including Yang's method and multitarget correction (MTC) applied on the MLEM reconstruction, and AMAP reconstruction without PVC. RESULTS: The results showed that the Yang's method improved quantification, however, yielded increased noise and reduced reproducibility in the regions with higher activity. MTC corrected for PVE on high count data with amplified noise, although yielded the worst performance among all the methods tested on low-count data. AMAP effectively suppressed noise and reduced the spill-in effect in the low activity regions. However it was unable to reduce the spill-out effect in high activity regions. NS-PVC yielded superior performance in terms of both quantitative assessment and visual image quality while improving reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that NS-PVC may be a promising PVC algorithm for application in low-dose protocols, and in gated and dynamic cardiac studies with low counts.
Authors: Sangtae Ahn; Steven G Ross; Evren Asma; Jun Miao; Xiao Jin; Lishui Cheng; Scott D Wollenweber; Ravindra M Manjeshwar Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Chung Chan; Mark Harris; Max Le; James Biondi; Yariv Grobshtein; Yi-Hwa Liu; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Rolf Vogel; Andreas Indermühle; Jessica Reinhardt; Pascal Meier; Patrick T Siegrist; Mehdi Namdar; Philipp A Kaufmann; Christian Seiler Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Zakir H Sahul; Rupak Mukherjee; James Song; Jarod McAteer; Robert E Stroud; Donald P Dione; Lawrence Staib; Xenophon Papademetris; Lawrence W Dobrucki; James S Duncan; Francis G Spinale; Albert J Sinusas Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Boon-Keng Teo; Youngho Seo; Stephen L Bacharach; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven K Libutti; Himanshu Shukla; Bruce H Hasegawa; Randall A Hawkins; Benjamin L Franc Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Marcelo F Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala; Jolene Meserve; Georges El Fakhri; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Qingyi Liu; Hassan Mohy-Ud-Din; Nabil E Boutagy; Mingyan Jiang; Silin Ren; John C Stendahl; Albert J Sinusas; Chi Liu Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.609