Literature DB >> 10556611

Electromagnetic recordings reveal latency differences in speech and tone processing in humans.

H Tiitinen1, P Sivonen, P Alku, J Virtanen, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Human auditory electromagnetic brain responses to sinusoidal (tone) and speech stimuli (Finnish vowel /a/ with two different glottal excitations) were studied with whole-head magnetoencephalogram (MEG) and electrodes placed on the subject's scalp. The frequency and intensity of the sinusoidal stimulus were optimally adjusted to match the spectra of the speech stimuli. Both tone and speech sounds elicited a prominent electric N1-P2 and magnetic N1m-P2m response complex. N1 and P2 amplitudes were larger to speech sounds than those to the tone. This amplitude enhancement was not as evident in the N1m and P2m obtained in MEG. Both the N1(m) and P2(m) latency always peaked earlier for the tone than for the vowels. The source origin of N1m for both the tone and speech stimuli was in the auditory cortex, there being no significant location differences as a function of stimulus type. N1m in the right hemisphere was anterior to that on the left, and P2m was anterior to N1m in both hemispheres. Varying the perceptual quality of the vowels by changing their glottal excitations (from "soft" /a/ to "pressed" /A/) had no effect on the response amplitudes or latencies. Thus, the present results show that only the latency behavior of N1(m) and P2(m) reliably dissociates speech and tone processing in humans. The findings are discussed in relation to previous observations on cortical processing of sinusoidal and vowel sounds and with regard to the glottal excitation in speech processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10556611     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  13 in total

1.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Leslie D Grush
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory target detection is affected by implicit temporal and spatial expectations.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Hajnal Jolsvai; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory Sensitivity to Formant Ratios:Toward an Account of Vowel Normalization.

Authors:  Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-07

6.  Speech perception in the child brain: cortical timing and its relevance to literacy acquisition.

Authors:  Tiina Parviainen; Päivi Helenius; Elisa Poskiparta; Pekka Niemi; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Intracranial mapping of auditory perception: event-related responses and electrocortical stimulation.

Authors:  A Sinai; N E Crone; H M Wied; P J Franaszczuk; D Miglioretti; D Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds.

Authors:  Ismo Miettinen; Hannu Tiitinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Categorization of extremely brief auditory stimuli: domain-specific or domain-general processes?

Authors:  Emmanuel Bigand; Charles Delbé; Yannick Gérard; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for an early processing of human voices.

Authors:  Ian Charest; Cyril R Pernet; Guillaume A Rousselet; Ileana Quiñones; Marianne Latinus; Sarah Fillion-Bilodeau; Jean-Pierre Chartrand; Pascal Belin
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.