Literature DB >> 27586201

Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers.

Alba Mota1,2, Eva Colás3, Pablo García-Sanz1,2, Irene Campoy4, Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián5, Sonia Gatius3, Ángel García6, Luis Chiva5, Sonsoles Alonso5, Antonio Gil-Moreno4,7, Xavier González-Tallada3, Berta Díaz-Feijoo4,7, August Vidal8, Patrycja Ziober-Malinowska9, Marcin Bobiński9, Rafael López-López10, Miguel Abal10, Jaume Reventós8,11, Xavier Matias-Guiu3,8, Gema Moreno-Bueno1,2.   

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract in developed countries. Although the majority of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at early stages and the 5-year overall survival is around 80%, early detection of these tumors is crucial to improve the survival of patients given that the advanced tumors are associated with a poor outcome. Furthermore, correct assessment of the pre-clinical diagnosis is decisive to guide the surgical treatment and management of the patient. In this sense, the potential of targeted genetic sequencing of uterine aspirates has been assessed as a pre-operative tool to obtain reliable information regarding the mutational profile of a given tumor, even in samples that are not histologically classifiable. A total of 83 paired samples were sequenced (uterine aspirates and hysterectomy specimens), including 62 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, 10 cases of atypical hyperplasia and 11 non-cancerous endometrial disorders. Even though diagnosing endometrial cancer based exclusively on genetic alterations is currently unfeasible, mutations were mainly found in uterine aspirates from malignant disorders, suggesting its potential in the near future for supporting the standard histologic diagnosis. Moreover, this approach provides the first evidence of the high intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity associated with endometrial cancer, evident when multiple regions of tumors are analyzed from an individual hysterectomy. Notably, the genetic analysis of uterine aspirates captures this heterogeneity, solving the potential problem of incomplete genetic characterization when a single tumor biopsy is analyzed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586201     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  41 in total

1.  Studying clonal dynamics in response to cancer therapy using high-complexity barcoding.

Authors:  Hyo-eun C Bhang; David A Ruddy; Viveksagar Krishnamurthy Radhakrishna; Justina X Caushi; Rui Zhao; Matthew M Hims; Angad P Singh; Iris Kao; Daniel Rakiec; Pamela Shaw; Marissa Balak; Alina Raza; Elizabeth Ackley; Nicholas Keen; Michael R Schlabach; Michael Palmer; Rebecca J Leary; Derek Y Chiang; William R Sellers; Franziska Michor; Vesselina G Cooke; Joshua M Korn; Frank Stegmeier
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  The mutational landscape of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Bo Hong; Matthieu Le Gallo; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Clonal evolution of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma from primary to recurrent disease.

Authors:  Mauro Castellarin; Katy Milne; Thomas Zeng; Kane Tse; Michael Mayo; Yongjun Zhao; John R Webb; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Robert A Holt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Tumor heterogeneity confounds and illuminates: assessing the implications.

Authors:  Maria Kleppe; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Discrepancy of pre- and postoperative grades of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  A Karateke; N Tug; C Cam; S Selcuk; M R Asoglu; S Cakir
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.196

Review 6.  Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Leigh A Cantrell; Stephanie V Blank; Linda R Duska
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Microsatellite instability and epigenetic inactivation of MLH1 and outcome of patients with endometrial carcinomas of the endometrioid type.

Authors:  Israel Zighelboim; Paul J Goodfellow; Feng Gao; Randall K Gibb; Matthew A Powell; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Clinical application of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.

Authors:  Leonie H A Broersen; Gabi W van Pelt; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Wilma E Mesker
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.730

10.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity in TP53 null High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma progression.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Juan Carlos Triviño; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastian; Ángel Martínez-Ramírez; Luis Chiva; Antonio González-Martín; Juan F Garcia; Pablo Garcia-Sanz; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic significance of mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yufang Hou; Tiegang Li; Wenqiang Gan; Silin Lv; Zifan Zeng; Zheng Yan; Weiqi Wang; Min Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

Review 3.  Exosomes on Endometrial Cancer: A Biomarkers Treasure Trove?

Authors:  Alexandros G Sykaras; Konstantinos Christofidis; Ekaterini Politi; Stamatios Theocharis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Intratumor genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution to decode endometrial cancer progression.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Sara S Oltra; Pier Selenica; Cristian P Moiola; Carlos Casas-Arozamena; Carlos López-Gil; Eva Diaz; Sonia Gatius; María Ruiz-Miro; Ana Calvo; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián; Pablo Hurtado; Roberto Piñeiro; Eva Colas; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Laura Muinelo-Romay; Miguel Abal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Britta Weigelt; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Urick; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Liquid Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer: New Opportunities for Personalized Oncology.

Authors:  Laura Muinelo-Romay; Carlos Casas-Arozamena; Miguel Abal
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Genomic Profiling of Uterine Aspirates and cfDNA as an Integrative Liquid Biopsy Strategy in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Casas-Arozamena; Eva Díaz; Cristian Pablo Moiola; Lorena Alonso-Alconada; Alba Ferreirós; Alicia Abalo; Carlos López Gil; Sara S Oltra; Javier de Santiago; Silvia Cabrera; Victoria Sampayo; Marta Bouso; Efigenia Arias; Juan Cueva; Eva Colas; Ana Vilar; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Miguel Abal; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Laura Muinelo-Romay
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  FXYD5/Dysadherin, a Biomarker of Endometrial Cancer Myometrial Invasion and Aggressiveness: Its Relationship With TGF-β1 and NF-κB Pathways.

Authors:  María José Besso; Marina Rosso; Lara Lapyckyj; Cristian Pablo Moiola; María Laura Matos; María Florencia Mercogliano; Roxana Schillaci; Jaume Reventos; Eva Colas; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Alejandra Wernicke; Roberto Orti; Mónica Hebe Vazquez-Levin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Cancer-associated mutations in normal human endometrium: Surprise or expected?

Authors:  Satoru Kyo; Seiya Sato; Kentaro Nakayama
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 10.  Liquid Biopsy for Monitoring EC Patients: Towards Personalized Treatment.

Authors:  Raquel Piñeiro-Pérez; Miguel Abal; Laura Muinelo-Romay
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.