Literature DB >> 21797117

Discrepancy of pre- and postoperative grades of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

A Karateke1, N Tug, C Cam, S Selcuk, M R Asoglu, S Cakir.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial curettage in patients with endometrial carcinoma. In this retrospective study, pre- and postoperative histopathologic findings of patients with endometrial cancer were investigated.
METHODS: 168 patients with the final diagnosis of endometrial cancer were enrolled in the study. Pre- and postoperative histopathologic diagnoses and grades (according to the 1988 FIGO classification) of the patients were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: 22 patients were diagnosed as having endometrial hyperplasia and the remaining 136 patients had endometrial carcinoma preoperatively. Overall discrepancy rate of grades was 39% (31% upgrade, 8% downgrade; p < 0.05). There was also 9% discrepancy between the pre- and postoperative histopathological types.
CONCLUSION: It has been suggested that since endometrial cancer patients with low grades according to the preoperative pathologic diagnosis have a potential to upgrade, the management of these patients if myometrial invasion is less than one-half thickness, simply by hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (without lymph node sampling), might actually miss some patients who actually deserve surgical staging. Further studies are needed to draw a sufficient conclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21797117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol        ISSN: 0392-2936            Impact factor:   0.196


  6 in total

1.  Genetic analysis of uterine aspirates improves the diagnostic value and captures the intra-tumor heterogeneity of endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Alba Mota; Eva Colás; Pablo García-Sanz; Irene Campoy; Alejandro Rojo-Sebastián; Sonia Gatius; Ángel García; Luis Chiva; Sonsoles Alonso; Antonio Gil-Moreno; Xavier González-Tallada; Berta Díaz-Feijoo; August Vidal; Patrycja Ziober-Malinowska; Marcin Bobiński; Rafael López-López; Miguel Abal; Jaume Reventós; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Gema Moreno-Bueno
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.

Authors:  Aline Talhouk; Lien N Hoang; Melissa K McConechy; Quentin Nakonechny; Joyce Leo; Angela Cheng; Samuel Leung; Winnie Yang; Amy Lum; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers.

Authors:  A Talhouk; M K McConechy; S Leung; H H Li-Chang; J S Kwon; N Melnyk; W Yang; J Senz; N Boyd; A N Karnezis; D G Huntsman; C B Gilks; J N McAlpine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  New classification of endometrial cancers: the development and potential applications of genomic-based classification in research and clinical care.

Authors:  A Talhouk; J N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-12-13

5.  Methylation status of KLF4 and HS3ST2 genes as predictors of endometrial cancer and hyperplastic endometrial lesions.

Authors:  Zuzana Danková; Dušan Braný; Dana Dvorská; Marcela Ňachajová; Roman Fiolka; Marián Grendár; Jozef Hatok; Peter Kubatka; Veronika Holubeková; Erika Halašová; Tibor Bielik; Pavol Žúbor
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 6.  Accuracy of preoperative sampling diagnosis for predicting final pathology in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  David Lukanović; Miha Matjašič; Borut Kobal
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.