Literature DB >> 27582825

Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: the effect of arm circumference and sphygmomanometer cuff size.

Chye L Kho1, Mark A Brown1, Sharon L H Ong1, George J Mangos1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the difference in blood pressure readings between the standard and large cuff and to determine if such a difference applies over a range of arm circumferences (ACs) in pregnancy. We measured blood pressure on 219 antenatal women. Six blood pressure readings were taken, three with a standard 'adult' and three with a 'large' cuff, in random order. A random zero sphygmomanometer was used by a trained observer. Women with an AC >33 cm were similar in age, gestational age and parity but were heavier and had more hypertension than those with AC ≤33 cm. There was a systematic difference between the standard and large cuff of 5-7 mmHg with little effect due to AC. We were unable to demonstrate an association between the standard and large cuff blood pressure difference and increasing blood pressure. Our study has shown that both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements are more dependent on the cuff size used than AC and for the individual it is difficult to predict the magnitude of effect the different cuff sizes will have on blood pressure measurements. This study has shown the presence of an average difference in blood pressure measurement between standard and large cuffs in pregnancy, and does not support the arbitrary 33 cm 'cut-off' recommended in guidelines for the use of a large cuff in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arm circumference; blood pressure measurement; cuff size; pregnancy

Year:  2009        PMID: 27582825      PMCID: PMC4989754          DOI: 10.1258/om.2009.090017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Med        ISSN: 1753-495X


  27 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy.

Authors:  S P Walker; J R Higgins; S P Brennecke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  Which Korotkoff sound should be used for the diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy?

Authors:  P M Duggan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  Blood pressure measurement in the lateral position.

Authors:  S M Kinsella; J A Spencer
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-09

4.  The accuracy of auscultatory measurement of arm blood pressure in very obese subjects.

Authors:  P E Nielsen; H Janniche
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1974-05

5.  The influence of arm girth and cuff size on the measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  R O Irvine
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1968-03

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry.

Authors:  A Shennan; M Gupta; A Halligan; D J Taylor; M de Swiet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-01-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The error in indirect blood pressure measurement with the incorrect size of cuff.

Authors:  L A Geddes; S J Whistler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 9.  Ambulatory versus conventional methods for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy.

Authors:  E Bergel; G Carroli; F Althabe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

10.  Blood pressure measurement in adults: large cuffs for all?

Authors:  P R Croft; J K Cruickshank
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  2 in total

1.  Quantile regression analysis of modifiable and non-modifiable drivers' of blood pressure among urban and rural women in Ghana.

Authors:  Dickson A Amugsi; Zacharie T Dimbuene; Gershim Asiki; Catherine Kyobutungi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Correlation of patient characteristics with arm and finger measurements in Asian parturients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ming Jian Lim; Chin Wen Tan; Hon Sen Tan; Rehena Sultana; Victoria Eley; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.