Literature DB >> 2758270

Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function.

J Rogers1, S Laurberg, J J Misiewicz, M M Henry, M Swash.   

Abstract

Sixteen subjects (mean (s.d.) age 50.7 (12.8) years, three men) were studied on two separate occasions by two experienced investigators in random order. A standard protocol of anatomical, manometric and electrophysiological assessments of anorectal motor and sensory function was followed. No significant differences were found between the results obtained by the two investigators in the measurements of perineal descent, anal canal length, and canal resting pressure and squeeze pressure, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, single-fibre electromyography fibre density of the external anal sphincter, and thresholds of mucosal electrosensitivity. This study shows that the standard tests of anorectal sensorimotor function are repeatable by different investigators. In addition, it suggests that comparison of data obtained in different centres using these techniques is valid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2758270     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  The usefulness of tests in anorectal disease.

Authors:  T G Parks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Anal manometry.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Cortical and spinal evoked potential response to electrical stimulation in human rectum.

Authors:  Brian Garvin; Lisa Lovely; Alex Tsodikov; Danielle Minecan; Shaungson Hong; John W Wiley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Rectal mucosal electrosensitivity - what is being tested?

Authors:  A P Meagher; M L Kennedy; D Z Lubowski
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function.

Authors:  P A Goldberg; M A Kamm; R J Nicholls; G Morris; K E Britton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; A J Roy; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of pregnancy on anal sphincter morphology and function.

Authors:  A H Sultan; M A Kamm; C N Hudson; C I Bartram
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Reproducibility of high-definition (3D) manometry and its agreement with high-resolution (2D) manometry in women with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S Chakraborty; K J Feuerhak; A R Zinsmeister; A E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  The cough response of the anal sphincter.

Authors:  A P Meagher; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.