Literature DB >> 8919338

Rectal mucosal electrosensitivity - what is being tested?

A P Meagher1, M L Kennedy, D Z Lubowski.   

Abstract

The results of rectal mucosal electrosensitivity (RME) testing have been used to support theories regarding the aetiology of both idiopathic constipation and bowel dysfunction following rectopexy. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of tests of RME. Sixty-eight patients, comprising three groups (group 1: 50 patients undergoing assessment in the Anorectal Physiology Unit, group 2: 10 patients with coloanal or ileoanal anastomosis, group 3: 8 patients with a stoma) underwent mucosal electrosensitivity testing, with the threshold stimulus required to elicit sensation being recorded. In addition the RME was measured in groups 1 and 2 when placing the electrode, mounted on a catheter with a central wire, against the anterior, posterior, right and left rectal or neorectal walls. To asses the influence on this test of loss of mucosal contact due to faeces, a further 8 cases with a normal rectum had RME performed with and without a layer of water soaked gauze around the electrode to stimulate faeces and prevent the electrode from making contact with the rectal mucosa. There was marked variance in the sensitivity of the different regions of rectal wall tested (P < 0.001). In group 1 patients the mean sensitivities were: central 36.6 mA, anterior 27.4 mA, posterior 37.9 mA, right 22.3 mA and left 25.6 mA. This circumferential variation suggests that the pelvic floor rather than rectal mucosa was being stimulated. All patients in group 2 had recordable sensitivities, and the mean sensitivity threshold was significantly higher than group 1 patients in the central (P = 0.03), right (P = 0.03) and left (P = 0.007) positions. In group 3 the sensitivity was greater within the stoma at the level of the abdominal wall muscle than intra-abdominally or subcutaneously, again suggesting an extra-colonic origin of the sensation. The sensitivity threshold was significantly greater with the electrode wrapped in gauze (P < 0.01), and loss of mucosal contact was not detected by the EMG machine. Therefore RME testing would seem not to measure mucosal sensitivity, and is probably influenced by the presence of faeces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8919338     DOI: 10.1007/bf00418852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Sensibility of the rectum and colon. Its rôle in the mechanism of anal continence.

Authors:  J C GOLIGHER; E S R HUGHES
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1951-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  R H Lane; A G Parks
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function.

Authors:  J Rogers; S Laurberg; J J Misiewicz; M M Henry; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Defecation and continence: some new concepts.

Authors:  A F Scharli; W B Kiesewetter
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1970 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Combined sensory and motor deficit in primary neuropathic faecal incontinence.

Authors:  J Rogers; M M Henry; J J Misiewicz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Rectal sensory evoked potentials: an assessment of their clinical value.

Authors:  C T Speakman; M A Kamm; M Swash
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Evidence of pudendal neuropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool.

Authors:  E S Kiff; P R Barnes; M Swash
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The role of partial denervation of the pelvic floor in the aetiology of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A neurophysiological study.

Authors:  A R Smith; G L Hosker; D W Warrell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-01

9.  Rectal mucosal electrosensory testing--evidence for a rectal sensory neuropathy in idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  M A Kamm; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Electromyography of the pubococcygeus muscles in patients with obstructed defaecation.

Authors:  D Z Lubowski; D W King; I G Finlay
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.