Literature DB >> 27579839

Cochlear Size and Shape Variability and Implications in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Juan Meng1, Sujuan Li, Fan Zhang, Qinglong Li, Zhaobing Qin.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: To study variations in cochlear size and shape with potential implications for cochlear implants.
BACKGROUND: A comprehension of the cochlear morphology is essential for nontraumatic electrode insertion and hearing preservation in individual surgery.
METHODS: A total of 310 normal developed cochleae with three-dimensional multiplanar reconstructed computed tomography images were studied. We measured the linear length of the half (1/2TL) and three quarters (3/4TL) of the basal turn, the first turn (1TL), the first two turns (2TL), and the cochlear length. The length and width of the cochlear base as well as the tilt angle within the first turn (α) and the angle between the first and second turns (γ) of the cochlea were also measured.
RESULTS: The measurement results showed that cochlear size and shape vary greatly among individuals. The length and width of cochlear base had positive correlations with 1/2TL (r = 0.526 and r = 0.625), 3/4TL (r = 0.633 and r = 0.729), 1TL (r = 0.658 and r = 0.754), 2TL (r = 0.677 and r = 0.795) and cochlear length (r = 0.622 and r = 0.769) respectively. The mean tilt angle α was 9.72 ± 1.85 degrees while the angle γ was 14.90 ± 1.36 degrees, and both had significant positive correlations with the ratio of length to width of cochlear base (p = 0.040 and p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION: The significant variations of the cochlear anatomy suggest that personalized cochlear implant is needed. The width of cochlear base has a stronger association with the linear length of cochlea. And the angle within the first turn and between the first and second turns can be predicted by the ratio of length to width of cochlear base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579839     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  21 in total

1.  CT-scan contouring technique allows for direct and reliable measurements of the cochlear duct length: implication in cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays.

Authors:  Thi Hau Vu; Chiara Perazzini; Mathilde Puechmaille; Aurélie Bachy; Aurélien Mulliez; Louis Boyer; Thierry Mom; Jean Gabrillargues
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Marcel Kluge; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Andrea Fulcheri; Maurizio Guida; Antonio Caruso; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cochlear Duct Length Measurements in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Newly Developed Techniques.

Authors:  Johannes Taeger; Franz Tassilo Müller-Graff; Lukas Ilgen; Phillip Schendzielorz; Rudolf Hagen; Tilman Neun; Kristen Rak
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-09-24

5.  Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

6.  Determination of Cochlear Duct Length With 3D Versus Two-dimensional Methods: A Retrospective Clinical Study of Imaging by Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Stephan Waldeck; Christian VON Falck; Rene Chapot; Marc Brockmann; Daniel Overhoff
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Initial Hearing Preservation Is Correlated With Cochlear Duct Length in Fully-inserted Long Flexible Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Emily S Hollis; Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A Dillon; Allison Young; Kristen Quinones; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Incidence of Complete Insertion in Cochlear Implant Recipients of Long Lateral Wall Arrays.

Authors:  Michael W Canfarotta; Margaret T Dillon; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Matthew M Dedmon; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.591

9.  An automated A-value measurement tool for accurate cochlear duct length estimation.

Authors:  John E Iyaniwura; Mai Elfarnawany; Hanif M Ladak; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Assessing Cochlear Implant Insertion Angle From an Intraoperative X-ray Using a Rotating 3D Helical Scala Tympani Model.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Michael W Canfarotta; Nicholas J Thompson; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Sarah E Hodge; Jenna Baker; Brendan P O'Connell
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.