Literature DB >> 2757862

Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.

G W Dalzell1, S R Cunningham, J Anderson, A A Adgey.   

Abstract

Intramyocardial current flow is a critical factor in successful ventricular defibrillation. The main determinants of intramyocardial current flow during transthoracic countershock are the selected energy and the transthoracic impedance of the patient. To optimise the success of the first shock and to titrate energy dosage according to each patient's transthoracic impedance, a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator was developed. It was compared with a conventional energy based protocol of 200 J (delivered energy), 200 J, then 360 J if required in 42 consecutive episodes of ventricular fibrillation in 33 men and seven women. The mean (SD) predicted transthoracic impedance was 69.9 (14.0) omega. First shock success with the standard protocol was 80.9%, and first or second shock success was 95.2%. The microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator automatically measured transthoracic impedance and calculated the energy required to develop a selected current in each patient. A current protocol of 30 A, 30 A, then 40 A, if required, was used in 29 men and 12 women with 41 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. Transthoracic impedance (mean 65.1 (15.9) omega) was similar to that in the energy protocol group and success rates for first shock (82.9%) and first or second shocks (97.5%) were also similar. The mean delivered energy per shock with the current based defibrillator for first or second shock success was significantly less (144.8 J) with the energy protocol (200 J). The mean peak current of successful shocks was also significantly reduced (29.0 v 31.9 A). A current based defibrillator titrates energy according to transthoracic impedance; it has a success rate comparable to conventional defibrillators but it delivers significantly less energy and current per shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2757862      PMCID: PMC1216706          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.61.6.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  15 in total

1.  Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium.

Authors:  D P Zipes; J Fischer; R M King; W W Jolly
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; W Schoenlein; M Minton; S Grubbs; P Wilcox
Journal:  Med Instrum       Date:  1976 May-Jun

3.  Acute cardiac damage in dogs given multiple transthoracic shocks with a trapezoidal wave-form defibrillator.

Authors:  J F Van Vleet; W A Tacker; L A Geddes; V J Ferrans
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Thoracic impedance of human subjects.

Authors:  J W Machin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Current required for ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J N Patton; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-02-24

6.  Sensitive detection of the effects of reperfusion on myocardium by ultrasonic tissue characterization with integrated backscatter.

Authors:  S A Wickline; L J Thomas; J G Miller; B E Sobel; J E Perez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Determinants of intracardiac current in defibrillation. Experimental studies in dogs.

Authors:  R Hoyt; J Grayzel; R E Kerber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Myocardial injury from transthoracic defibrillator countershock.

Authors:  E D Warner; C Dahl; G A Ewy
Journal:  Arch Pathol       Date:  1975-01

9.  Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation.

Authors:  J L Jones; R E Jones
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Ventricular defibrillation -- a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks.

Authors:  W D Weaver; L A Cobb; M K Copass; A P Hallstrom
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  G W Dalzell; A A Adgey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-06

Review 2.  [Transthoracic defibrillation. Physiologic and pathophysiologic principles and their role in the outcome of resuscitation].

Authors:  V Lischke; P Kessler; C Byhahn; K Westphal; A Amann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  A framework of current based defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of biphasic truncated exponential waveform in rabbits.

Authors:  Weiming Li; Jingru Li; Liang Wei; Jianjie Wang; Li Peng; Juan Wang; Changlin Yin; Yongqin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.