| Literature DB >> 27577101 |
Qianglin Zeng1, Dandan Li2, Gui Huang1, Jin Xia1, Xiaoming Wang1, Yamei Zhang3, Wanping Tang1, Hui Zhou1.
Abstract
Short-term forecast of pertussis incidence is helpful for advanced warning and planning resource needs for future epidemics. By utilizing the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model and Exponential Smoothing (ETS) model as alterative models with R software, this paper analyzed data from Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) between January 2005 and June 2016. The ARIMA (0,1,0)(1,1,1)12 model (AICc = 1342.2 BIC = 1350.3) was selected as the best performing ARIMA model and the ETS (M,N,M) model (AICc = 1678.6, BIC = 1715.4) was selected as the best performing ETS model, and the ETS (M,N,M) model with the minimum RMSE was finally selected for in-sample-simulation and out-of-sample forecasting. Descriptive statistics showed that the reported number of pertussis cases by China CDC increased by 66.20% from 2005 (4058 cases) to 2015 (6744 cases). According to Hodrick-Prescott filter, there was an apparent cyclicity and seasonality in the pertussis reports. In out of sample forecasting, the model forecasted a relatively high incidence cases in 2016, which predicates an increasing risk of ongoing pertussis resurgence in the near future. In this regard, the ETS model would be a useful tool in simulating and forecasting the incidence of pertussis, and helping decision makers to take efficient decisions based on the advanced warning of disease incidence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27577101 PMCID: PMC5006025 DOI: 10.1038/srep32367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Yearly and monthly data of pertussis incidence numbers in mainland China from 2005 to 2015.
Figure 2Results from decomposing the monthly pertussis incidence time series using the Hodrick-Prescott filter model with monthly smoothing parameter λ = 14,400.
Ljung-Box Q tests of two best performing models.
| ARIMA (0,1,0)(1,1,1)12 | ETS(M,N,M) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lags | Chi-squared | Lags | Chi-squared | ||
| 1 | 1.104 | 0.293 | 1 | 0.086 | 0.770 |
| 6 | 6.881 | 0.332 | 6 | 6.164 | 0.405 |
| 12 | 13.525 | 0.332 | 12 | 12.461 | 0.409 |
| 13 | 15.63 | 0.270 | 13 | 13.477 | 0.412 |
| 18 | 22.433 | 0.213 | 18 | 20.797 | 0.290 |
| 24 | 23.991 | 0.462 | 24 | 27.114 | 0.299 |
| 25 | 23.992 | 0.520 | 25 | 27.237 | 0.344 |
| 30 | 29.365 | 0.499 | 30 | 31.955 | 0.370 |
Figure 3Goodness tests of in sample simulating and forecasting of ARIMA (0,1,0)(1,1,1)[12] model.
Figure 4Goodness tests of in sample simulating and forecasting of ETS (M,N,M) model.
Figure 5In-sample simulating and forecasting results of best performing models from each alterative model.
Testing results of ARCH-effects about original series and best performing ARIMA and ETS models.
| Original time series of pertussis incidence | Residual of the ARIMA (0,1,0) (1,1,1)[12] model | Residual of the ETS(M,N,M) model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lags() | Chi-squared | Lags() | Chi-squared | Lags | Chi-squared | |||
| 1 | 92.467 | <0.001 | 1 | 7.121 | 0.007 | 1 | 7.838 | 0.005 |
| 6 | 97.837 | <0.001 | 6 | 7.939 | 0.243 | 6 | 10.225 | 0.116 |
| 12 | 98.818 | <0.001 | 12 | 8.121 | 0.776 | 12 | 11.407 | 0.494 |
| 13 | 101.26 | <0.001 | 13 | 8.744 | 0.792 | 13 | 13.281 | 0.426 |
| 18 | 98.714 | <0.001 | 18 | 9.033 | 0.959 | 18 | 15.813 | 0.606 |
| 24 | 96.158 | <0.001 | 24 | 9.173 | 0.997 | 24 | 17.548 | 0.824 |
| 25 | 95.253 | <0.001 | 25 | 9.093 | 0.999 | 25 | 18.976 | 0.798 |
| 30 | 92.005 | <0.001 | 30 | 9.966 | 0.999 | 30 | 18.957 | 0.941 |
Parameter estimation for best performing ARIMA and ETS models for pertussis incidence.
| Alterative models | ME | RMSE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARIMA (0,1,0)(1,1,1)12 | 2.900 | 61.689 | 39.151 | −0.433 | 21.819 | 0.415 |
| ETS(M,N,M) (Optimal model) | 4.844 | 52.202 | 37.810 | 0.003 | 17.490 | 0.401 |
Forecasting incidence cases of pertussis from July to December in 2016.
| Time | Forecasts | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Jul-16 | 599 | [345, 853] |
| Aug-16 | 635 | [320, 950] |
| Sep-16 | 436 | [192, 679] |
| Oct-16 | 232 | [89, 376] |
| Nov-16 | 222 | [73, 371] |
| Dec-16 | 293 | [82, 504] |
Figure 6Out-of-sample forecasting results of pertussis incidence from July to December in 2016.