Masatsugu Orui1, Yuriko Suzuki1,2, Masaharu Maeda3, Seiji Yasumura1. 1. 1 Department of Public Health, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Japan. 2. 2 National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Department of Adult Mental Health, Tokyo, Japan. 3. 3 Department of Disaster Psychiatry, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Associations between nuclear disasters and suicide have been examined to a limited extent. AIM: To clarify the suicide rates in evacuation areas after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima, which occurred in March 2011. METHOD: This descriptive study used monthly data from vital statistics between March 2009 and December 2015. Suicide rates in areas to which evacuation orders had been issued, requiring across-the-board, compulsory evacuation of residents from the entire or part of municipalities, were obtained and compared with the national average. RESULTS: Male suicide rates in evacuation areas increased significantly immediately after the disaster, and then began to increase again 4 years after the disaster. Female suicide rates declined slightly during the first year and then increased significantly over the subsequent 3-year period. Moreover, male rates in areas where evacuation orders were issued for the total area declined over the course of approximately 2 years, but then began to increase thereafter. Analysis by age revealed postdisaster male rates in evacuation areas decreased for those aged 50-69 years and increased for those aged ≤ 29 years and ≥ 70 years. LIMITATIONS: The number of suicides among females and the female population in the evacuation area was small. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the need to keep in mind that, when providing post-disaster mental health services, suicide rates can eventually increase even if they initially decrease.
BACKGROUND: Associations between nuclear disasters and suicide have been examined to a limited extent. AIM: To clarify the suicide rates in evacuation areas after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima, which occurred in March 2011. METHOD: This descriptive study used monthly data from vital statistics between March 2009 and December 2015. Suicide rates in areas to which evacuation orders had been issued, requiring across-the-board, compulsory evacuation of residents from the entire or part of municipalities, were obtained and compared with the national average. RESULTS: Male suicide rates in evacuation areas increased significantly immediately after the disaster, and then began to increase again 4 years after the disaster. Female suicide rates declined slightly during the first year and then increased significantly over the subsequent 3-year period. Moreover, male rates in areas where evacuation orders were issued for the total area declined over the course of approximately 2 years, but then began to increase thereafter. Analysis by age revealed postdisaster male rates in evacuation areas decreased for those aged 50-69 years and increased for those aged ≤ 29 years and ≥ 70 years. LIMITATIONS: The number of suicides among females and the female population in the evacuation area was small. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the need to keep in mind that, when providing post-disaster mental health services, suicide rates can eventually increase even if they initially decrease.
Entities:
Keywords:
disaster; epidemiology; mental health care; nuclear; suicide
The Great East Japan Earthquake, which occurred on March 11, 2011, was the largest
earthquake ever recorded in Japan’s history. The earthquake with a magnitude of 9.0
generated a massive tsunami and caused enormous damage to the Pacific Coast. This
was followed by a separate tsunami, which hit the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power
Plant operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Company, causing radiation disasters in
Fukushima Prefecture and requiring long-term evacuation of residents from many
surrounding municipalities. Due to this triple disaster, more than 164,000 residents
who lived near the nuclear power plant were forced to leave their homes at the
direction of the Japanese government. These residents are still affected by ongoing
evacuation, and almost 80,000 evacuees remain unable to return to their hometowns
(as of February 2017; Fukushima
Prefectural Government, Japan, 2017).Devastating natural disasters and their aftermath cause psychological distress in
affected individuals, although it does not necessarily equate to the development of
a mental illness. In Fukushima, the triple disaster – the earthquake, tsunami, and
nuclear disaster – led to mandatory evacuation of people from the surrounding
region, and residents were forced to relocate to non-evacuation areas and live under
very stressful conditions, faced with separation from family members, loss of
housing, and adjustment to new circumstances (Hyodo et al., 2010; Kiliç & Ulusoy, 2003; Suzuki et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2006). Psychological distress has been shown to be a
major long-term health issue in a previous study following the Chernobyl nuclear
accident (Bromet & Havenaar,
2007). Therefore, disaster mental health services have been made
available in Fukushima on an ongoing basis based on experiences with past disasters
(Kim, 2011; Takeda, 2011).The association between nuclear disasters and suicide has been examined to a limited
extent, that is, among clean-up workers in nuclear power plants (Loganovsky et al., 2008; Rahu, Rahu, Tekkel, & Bromet.,
2006). While suicide rates in evacuation areas may serve as an important
indicator of mental health status in evacuees after a nuclear disaster, no study has
examined changes in suicide rates in confined areas (i.e., evacuation areas), partly
due to the rarity of such disasters. Moreover, it is difficult to collect suicide
data in evacuation areas, as residents of these municipalities are scattered across
the country after being forced to relocate outside the evacuation zone.The present study aimed to examine changes in suicide rates in evacuation areas after
the Fukushima nuclear disaster using vital statistics, including information such as
predisaster addresses of evacuees. In addition, we hypothesized that evacuees from
total evacuation areas (municipalities in which evacuation orders have been issued
for the total area) might be more susceptible to mental health deterioration due to
unpredictable radiation hazard regulations and uncertain prospects of livelihood,
and that suicide rates would be higher in these areas. Our findings will be useful
for the development of future policies on mental care activities for evacuees who
are still affected by ongoing evacuation.
Method
Study Design
This descriptive study used monthly suicide data collected nationally as well as
for each municipality in Fukushima Prefecture from March 2009 through December
2015. Data were obtained from vital statistics in Japan (Ministry of Health,
Labour, and Welfare) and contained information such as age, sex, and address
(certificate of residence) at the time of death. Official permission was
obtained for the use of vital statistics from the Ministry of Health, Labour,
and Welfare on the basis of Article 33 of the Statistics Act. The Japanese
certificate of residence system is a registry of current residential addresses
maintained by local governments in Japan. Under Japanese law, each resident’s
current address must be reported to the local government, which utilizes the
information for tax, census, or vital statistics purposes. In the present study,
it was possible to compare pre- and postdisaster suicide rates because vital
statistics were recorded in the original municipalities before the disaster,
unless the certificate of residence was updated after evacuation.To calculate suicide rates, basic annual population data from the resident
registry of each municipality (as of March 31, 2009–2015) were collected from
the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Statistics Bureau. This
study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution.
Study Subjects
The Japanese government has designated evacuation areas according to spatial
radiation dose rates as follows: (a) difficult-to-return areas, with a radiation
dose rate of ≥ 50 millisieverts (mSv) per year; (b) residence restriction
areas, with a radiation dose rate of ≥ 20 and < 50 mSv per year; and
(c) areas where evacuation orders are ready to be lifted, with a radiation dose
rate of < 20 mSv per year. The residents of these areas were forced to
relocate to non-evacuation areas and were not allowed to stay overnight after
the disaster. As for residence restriction areas and areas where evacuation
orders are ready to be lifted, temporary entry is permitted (Ministry of Economy, Trade, and
Industry, Government of Japan, Dec 20, 2013). Currently,
difficult-to-return areas are still subject to protective measures, such as
barricades, due to high spatial radiation dose rates.In the present study, we targeted all three designated evacuation areas (i.e.,
difficult-to-return areas, residence restriction areas, and areas where
evacuation orders are ready to be lifted) from which the residents had been
forced to relocate. We defined (a) municipalities in which evacuation orders
have been issued for the total area as "total evacuation areas," and (b)
municipalities in which evacuation orders have been lifted as of 2015, or have
been issued partially, as "terminated/partial evacuation areas." Under
these definitions, Naraha Town, Tomioka Town, Okuma Town, Futaba Town, Namie
Town, Katsurao Village, and Iitate Village were included in total evacuation
areas, and Tamura City, Minami-Soma City, Kawamata Town, Hirono Town, and
Kawauchi Village were included in terminated/partial evacuation areas (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Basic information
regarding total evacuation areas and terminated/partial evacuation areas is
provided in Table 1. The
total population of these evacuation areas is approximately 188,000 (51,000
residents in total evacuation areas and 138,000 residents in terminated/partial
evacuation areas). The total population of non-evacuation areas is 1.8 million.
Raw data on the number of suicides and suicide rates in evacuation and
non-evacuation areas (81-month period, March 2009 to December 2015) are shown in
Table 2.
Figure 1
Evacuation areas (total and terminated/partial evacuation areas)
designated after the Fukushima nuclear disaster
Notes. The tsunami generated by the Great East Japan
Earthquake hit the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, causing a
nuclear disaster in Fukushima Prefecture. The location of the Fukushima
Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is circled. Regions colored in dark gray
correspond to municipalities where evacuation orders were issued for the
total area (total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate). Regions colored in light gray correspond
to municipalities designated as terminated/partial evacuation areas
(Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and Kawauchi). Uncolored
municipalities correspond to non-evacuation areas.
Total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate
Terminated/partial evacuation areas: Tamura,
Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and Kawauchi
Non-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Figure 2
Transition of compulsory evacuation orders of residents from the
entire or part of municipalities in total and terminated/partial
evacuation areas
Note. In total evacuation areas, compulsory evacuation
orders continued until December 2015 in entire municipalities, except
Naraha Town (evacuation order lifted in September 2015 in Naraha).
Compulsory evacuation orders were issued to parts of municipalities in
terminated/partial evacuation areas or were lifted prior to 2015. The
bold arrow corresponds to compulsory evacuation orders for entire
municipalities, and the dotted arrow corresponds to compulsory
evacuation orders to parts of municipalities.
Table 1
Basic information regarding the total and terminated/partial
evacuation areas
Areas
Population as of March 11, 20111
Population as of January 1, 20152
Notes. 1Fukushima
prefectural government, Japan. 2Cabinet Office,
Government of Japan. 3As of March 31, 2011.
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Evacuation area = 12
municipalities designed as radiation hazard areas by
Japanese government. Non-evacuation areas = Other
municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture.
Evacuation areas
188.297
173.210
Total evacuation areas
50.669
46.568
Naraha Town
8.011
7.448
Tomioka Town
15.937
14.111
Okuma Town
11.505
10.849
Futaba Town
7.140
6.354
Katsurao Village
1.567
1.489
Iitate Village
6.509
6.317
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
137.628
126.642
Tamura City
41.662
39.484
Minami-Soma City
71.561
64.539
Kawamata Town
15.877
14.732
Hirono Town
5.490
5.148
Kawauchi Village
3.038
2.739
Non-evacuation areas
1,828,1293
1.773.092
Table 2
Raw data on the number of suicides and rates in the evacuation and
non-evacuation areas (81-month period, March 2009–December 2015)
Number of suicides (per month)
Annualized rates (per month, per 100,000)
Median
Max.
Min.
Median
Max.
Min.
Notes. Evacuation area = 12
municipalities designed as radiation hazard areas by
Japanese government. Non-evacuation areas = Other
municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture.
Men
Evacuation areas
3
7
0
34.7
88.9
0.0
Total evacution areas
1
4
0
33.4
138.1
0.0
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
2
7
0
35.8
135.0
0.0
Non-evacuation areas
24
46
11
33.0
62.0
15.2
National average
1.540
2.174
1.185
29.5
42.0
22.7
Women
Evacuation areas
1
5
0
12.0
60.1
0.0
Total evacution areas
0
2
0
0.0
70.7
0.0
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
1
4
0
17.1
72.8
0.0
Non-evacuation areas
9
23
3
11.9
29.4
3.9
National average
657
1.035
497
12.1
19.2
9.1
Evacuation areas (total and terminated/partial evacuation areas)
designated after the Fukushima nuclear disaster
Notes. The tsunami generated by the Great East Japan
Earthquake hit the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, causing a
nuclear disaster in Fukushima Prefecture. The location of the Fukushima
Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is circled. Regions colored in dark gray
correspond to municipalities where evacuation orders were issued for the
total area (total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate). Regions colored in light gray correspond
to municipalities designated as terminated/partial evacuation areas
(Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and Kawauchi). Uncolored
municipalities correspond to non-evacuation areas.Total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and IitateTerminated/partial evacuation areas: Tamura,
Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and KawauchiNon-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Transition of compulsory evacuation orders of residents from the
entire or part of municipalities in total and terminated/partial
evacuation areas
Note. In total evacuation areas, compulsory evacuation
orders continued until December 2015 in entire municipalities, except
Naraha Town (evacuation order lifted in September 2015 in Naraha).
Compulsory evacuation orders were issued to parts of municipalities in
terminated/partial evacuation areas or were lifted prior to 2015. The
bold arrow corresponds to compulsory evacuation orders for entire
municipalities, and the dotted arrow corresponds to compulsory
evacuation orders to parts of municipalities.
Data Analysis
Monthly suicide rates were calculated for each of the 12 municipalities
designated as evacuation areas as well as non-evacuation areas by adding the
monthly number of suicides in each municipality and dividing the total by the
Basic Resident Register population. These values were then multiplied by 12 to
obtain annual rates, as follows:Annual suicide rate = {∑ (monthly number of suicides in each
evacuation area or non-evacuation area)/∑ (Basic Resident Register
population in each evacuation area or non-evacuation area)}*12Monthly suicide rates were analyzed by the following three methods. First, the
exponential smoothing time series model was used to examine the trend of suicide
rates post disaster and for future prediction (Zeng et al., 2016). Second, period analysis was performed
by dividing the 81-month study period into five segments (12 months in each
period from March 2009 to February 2015, and 10 months in each period from April
2015 to December 2015), and suicide rates were compared with the national
average of the corresponding period using Poisson distribution. Third, suicide
rates were analyzed by age categories using a 2-year simple moving average
because the number of age-categorized suicide cases was small. In addition, we
compared suicide rates between total evacuation areas and terminated/partial
evacuation areas by period analysis and age-based analysis.
Results
Changes in Suicide Rates in Evacuation and Non-Evacuation Areas by the
Exponential Smoothing Time Series Model
Changes in suicide rates in evacuation and non-evacuation areas were examined
using the exponential smoothing time series model (Figure 3). In evacuation areas, male suicide
rates increased immediately after the disaster and then declined over the course
of approximately 2.5 years postdisaster. In addition, while suicide rates were
higher in evacuation areas compared with those of non-evacuation areas and the
national average for approximately 1.5 years postdisaster, they then decreased
to levels equivalent to non-evacuation areas and the national average. During
the approximately 1.5– 4 years after the disaster, suicide rates in evacuation
areas remained lower than those of non-evacuation areas, but exceeded the rates
in non-evacuation areas at 4.5 years postdisaster and showed an increasing trend
thereafter. Female suicide rates in evacuation areas declined slightly during
the initial period of approximately 1.5 years postdisaster, but then increased
to exceed those of non-evacuation areas as well as the national average.
Figure 3
Changes in suicide rates in evacuation and non-evacuation areas by
the exponential smoothing time series model
Notes. Changes in suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in
the evacuation and non-evacuation areas. The solid and dotted lines show
the transition of suicide rates in the evacuation areas and
non-evacuation areas, respectively. The light gray line shows the
transition of the national average. The arrows indicate the occurrence
of the nuclear disaster following the Great East Japan Earthquake.
Non-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Changes in suicide rates in evacuation and non-evacuation areas by
the exponential smoothing time series model
Notes. Changes in suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in
the evacuation and non-evacuation areas. The solid and dotted lines show
the transition of suicide rates in the evacuation areas and
non-evacuation areas, respectively. The light gray line shows the
transition of the national average. The arrows indicate the occurrence
of the nuclear disaster following the Great East Japan Earthquake.Annualized suicide rate: Monthly suicide
number/population × 100,000 × 12Evacuation areas: Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono,
Naraha, Tomioka, Kawauchi, Okuma, Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, and
IitateNon-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Comparison of Suicide Rates in Evacuation and Non-Evacuation Areas With the
National Average Using Poisson Distribution
A comparison of predisaster male suicide rates in evacuation areas with the
national average using Poisson distribution showed no significant difference.
During the first 12-month postdisaster period (March 2011 to February 2012),
male suicide rates in evacuation areas were significantly higher than the
national average (p = .03); however, they then decreased to
below the national average and remained low during the second and third 12-month
periods (March 2012 to February 2014). Subsequently, after the fourth 12-month
period, male suicide rates in evacuation areas were higher again compared with
the national average. In non-evacuation areas, male suicide rates were
significantly higher than the national average predisaster but subsequently
reached the national average during the first and second 12-month postdisaster
periods. However, suicide rates increased significantly thereafter, exceeding
the national average during the postdisaster period. During the first and second
postdisaster periods, female suicide rates in evacuation areas did not show
significant changes as compared with the national average, although there were
steep, significant increases during the third 12-month postdisaster period (from
March 2013 to February 2014; p < .01).In the present study, male suicide rates in non-evacuation areas only showed a
decreasing trend after the disaster relative to the national average. However,
during the third and fourth 12-month postdisaster periods (March 2013 to
February 2015), male suicide rates increased significantly compared with the
national average. Moreover, female suicide rates increased during the first
postdisaster period (March 2011 to February 2012), but then decreased to reach
the national average. However, significant increases were observed during the
fifth postdisaster period (March 2015 to December 2015) compared with the
national average (Table 3
and Figure 4A).
Table 3
Suicide rates by period analysis compared to national averages using
a Poisson distribution
Suicide rate by each period (per 100,000)
Sex
Area
2009.3–2010.2
2010.3–2011.2
2011.3–2012.2
2012.3–2013.2
2013.3–2014.2
2014.3–2015.2
2015.3–2015.12
Notes. Evacuation areas = All
municipalities in the whole & the other evacuation
areas. Total evacuation areas = Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma,
Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate. Terminated/partial
evacuation areas = Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono,
and Kawauchi. Non-evacuation areas = Other municipalities in
Fukushima Prefecture. *p < .05;
**p < .01
Men
Evacuation areas
32.7
38.6
43.7*
23.6
26.0
27.2
35.6
(p = .36)
(p = .18)
(p = .03)
(p = .14)
(p = .38)
(p = .48)
(p = .05)
Total evacuation areas
34.5
41.7
32.7
20.8
15.1
15.2
18.6
(p = .54)
(p = .22)
(p = .52)
(p = .21)
(p = .09)
(p = .13)
(p = .28)
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
31.7
36.9
49.5*
25.0
31.7
33.5
44.3**
(p = .35)
(p = .32)
(p = .01)
(p = .27)
(p = .34)
(p = .18)
(p < .01)
Non-evacuation areas
43.1*
37.6*
32.8
31.2
32.1*
30.6*
28.5
(p < .01)
(p = .01)
(p = .37)
(p = .28)
(p = .02)
(p = .02)
(p = .05)
National average
35.5
33.1
32.2
30.1
28.4
26.7
25.6
Women
Evacuation areas
14.2
14.9
12.8
10.9
24.0*
13.1
17.2
(p = .40)
(p = .34)
(p = .46)
(p = .41)
(p < .01)
(p = .35)
(p = .06)
Total evacuation areas
8.5
19.3
5.9
5.9
20.6
8.9
18.0
(p = .33)
(p = .21)
(p = .15)
(p = .21)
(p = .10)
(p = .46)
(p = .14)
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
17.1
12.7
16.3
13.5
25.8**
15.3
16.8
(p = .21)
(p = .55)
(p = .33)
(p = .44)
(p < .01)
(p = .22)
(p = .15)
Non-evacuation areas
18.8
11.3
17.4
11.2
10.8
11.3
16.2*
(p = .07)
(p = .47)
(p = .17)
(p = .18)
(p = .36)
(p = .43)
(p = .01)
National average
13.0
13.2
13.8
12.4
11.6
11.5
10.5
Figure 4A
Comparison of suicide rates in evacuation areas and non-evacuation
areas with the national average
Notes. Suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in evacuation
areas and non-evacuation areas are shown by postdisaster period. The
bold line and dotted line show the transition of suicide rates in
evacuation areas and non-evacuation areas, respectively. The arrows
indicate the occurrence of the nuclear disaster following the Great East
Japan Earthquake. Postdisaster suicide rates were compared with the
national average using Poisson distribution. * p
< .05, ** p < .01, Poisson distribution
test
Non-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Comparison of suicide rates in evacuation areas and non-evacuation
areas with the national average
Notes. Suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in evacuation
areas and non-evacuation areas are shown by postdisaster period. The
bold line and dotted line show the transition of suicide rates in
evacuation areas and non-evacuation areas, respectively. The arrows
indicate the occurrence of the nuclear disaster following the Great East
Japan Earthquake. Postdisaster suicide rates were compared with the
national average using Poisson distribution. * p
< .05, ** p < .01, Poisson distribution
testAnnualized suicide rate: Monthly suicide
number/population × 100,000 × 12Evacuation areas: Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono,
Naraha, Tomioka, Kawauchi, Okuma, Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, and
IitateNon-evacuation areas: Other municipalities in Fukushima
Prefecture
Comparison of Suicide Rates in Total Evacuation Areas and Terminated/Partial
Evacuation Areas With the National Average Using Poisson Distribution
Compared with the national average, male suicide rates in total evacuation areas
were lower after the second postdisaster period (March 2012 to February 2013)
and remained low thereafter. On the other hand, suicide rates in
terminated/partial evacuation areas were consistently above the national
average, except during the second postdisaster period. In particular, suicide
rates in terminated/partial evacuation areas were significantly higher than the
national average during the first and fifth postdisaster periods. Moreover,
female suicide rates in total evacuation areas and terminated/partial evacuation
areas were comparable to male suicide rates in total evacuation areas.
Postdisaster suicide rates in total evacuation areas were consistently lower
compared with terminated/partial evacuation areas (Table 3 and Figure 4B).
Figure 4B
Comparison of suicide rates in total evacuation areas and
terminated/partial evacuation areas with the national average
Notes. Suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in total
evacuation areas and terminated/partial evacuation areas are shown by
postdisaster period. The bold dotted line and thin dotted line show the
transition of suicide rates in total evacuation areas and
terminated/partial evacuation areas, respectively. The arrows
indicate the occurrence of the nuclear disaster following the Great East
Japan Earthquake. Postdisaster suicide rates were compared with the
national average using Poisson distribution. * p
< .05, ** p < .01, Poisson distribution
test
Total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate
Terminated/partial evacuation areas: Tamura,
Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and Kawauchi
Comparison of suicide rates in total evacuation areas and
terminated/partial evacuation areas with the national average
Notes. Suicide rates (per 100,000 people) in total
evacuation areas and terminated/partial evacuation areas are shown by
postdisaster period. The bold dotted line and thin dotted line show the
transition of suicide rates in total evacuation areas and
terminated/partial evacuation areas, respectively. The arrows
indicate the occurrence of the nuclear disaster following the Great East
Japan Earthquake. Postdisaster suicide rates were compared with the
national average using Poisson distribution. * p
< .05, ** p < .01, Poisson distribution
testAnnualized suicide rate: Monthly suicide
number/population × 100,000 × 12Total evacuation areas: Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma, Futaba,
Namie, Katsurao, and IitateTerminated/partial evacuation areas: Tamura,
Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono, and Kawauchi
Analysis of Suicide Rates by Age Categories in Evacuation Areas (Total and
Terminated/Partial Evacuation Areas) and Non-Evacuation Areas
Male suicide rates in evacuation areas decreased greatly after the first
postdisaster period (March 2011 to February 2013) for those aged 30–49 and 50–69
years, and increased for those aged ≤ 29 years and ≥ 70 years.
During the subsequent postdisaster periods, suicide rates among those aged 50–69
years in evacuation areas remained lower, while suicide rates among those aged
≤ 29 years and ≥ 70 years remained higher than predisaster rates
(March 2009 to February 2011). During the first postdisaster period, female
suicide rates in the evacuation areas were similar to predisaster rates in all
age categories. However, during the third postdisaster period (March 2013 to
February 2015), suicide rates among those aged ≤ 29 years and ≥ 70
years increased (Table 4).
Table 4
Suicide mortality rate by age group in evacuation area
Men
Women
Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000)
Area
Period
≤ 29
30–49
50–69
≥70
≤ 29
30–49
50–69
≥70
Notes. Evacuation areas = All
municipalities in the whole & the other evacuation
areas. Total evacuation areas = Naraha, Tomioka, Okuma,
Futaba, Namie, Katsurao, and Iitate. Terminated/Partial
evacuation areas = Tamura, Minami-Soma, Kawamata, Hirono,
and Kawauchi. Non-evacuation areas = Other municipalities in
Fukushima Prefecture.
Whole evacuation area
Pre-
2009.3–2011.2
9.2
34.9
65.8
51.9
0.0
0.0
25.8
33.9
2010.3–2012.2
14.0
29.9
52.0
68.0
0.0
0.0
26.0
24.5
Post-
2011.3–2013.2
19.8
12.5
24.0
68.8
0.0
0.0
15.8
6.3
2012.3–2014.2
15.2
12.6
14.4
39.0
5.4
0.0
21.0
25.2
2013.3–2015.2
10.4
6.4
19.3
28.9
5.5
0.0
15.8
37.6
2014.3–2015.12
11.8
0.0
26.3
43.9
6.7
0.0
11.7
34.8
Terminated/partial evacuation areas
Pre-
2009.3–2011.2
12.8
44.6
51.7
28.2
2.7
13.4
20.5
25.4
2010.3–2012.2
18.4
48.6
59.1
48.2
2.8
13.9
10.3
31.1
Post-
2011.3–2013.2
16.7
43.7
44.8
48.2
0.0
7.3
20.9
28.5
2012.3–2014.2
14.4
27.3
34.9
39.3
3.1
7.4
23.6
39.8
2013.3–2015.2
23.8
27.6
32.5
52.1
12.8
7.5
15.9
42.4
2014.3–2015.12
23.2
50.6
33.0
61.9
9.8
17.6
20.9
15.2
Discussion
Our findings revealed an immediate increase in suicide rates after the Fukushima
nuclear disaster only among men in terminated/partial evacuation areas. After
subsequently decreasing temporarily once, delayed increases were observed in suicide
rates in evacuation areas, with rates differing by gender, age, and area. In a
previous study on the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, a long-term increase in suicide
rates among clean-up workers was reported (Bromet & Havenaar, 2007). Moreover, we observed similar changes in
suicide rates as reported by other previous studies concerning the 1995 Great
Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, as well as the Great East Japan Earthquake and subsequent
tsunami disaster. Specifically, suicide rates decreased immediately after the
disaster, with a subsequent increase over the course of roughly 1.5–2 years (Nishio et al., 2009; Ohto, Maeda, Yabe, Yasumura, & Bromet,
2015; Orui et al.,
2015). While the delayed increase in suicide rates is a consistent
finding in this and other studies, we also observed gender differences in the
present study. Specifically, female suicide rates increased after 1.5 years during
the postdisaster period, whereas male suicide rates increased immediately following
the disaster, then declined below the national average, and subsequently increased
after 2.5 years after the disaster.We found several differences in postdisaster suicide rates by age category and
gender. Suicide rates among male elderly individuals (≥ 70 years) in
evacuation areas increased immediately following the disaster, whereas female
suicide rates increased with a delay. A number of previous studies examined factors
related to suicide ideation and suicide attempts among the elderly, and found
depression and social problems (e.g., thwarted belongingness, perceived
burdensomeness, or hopelessness to live), chronic interpersonal difficulties, and
family conflicts to be risk factors (Shinfuku, 2002; Szanto
et al., 2012; Van Orden
et al., 2010; Van Orden
et al., 2015). Drastic life changes accompanying mandatory evacuation
could cause psychological disorders and social problems, possibly leading to
increased suicide rates among the elderly. With respect to increased suicide rates
among the youth (≤ 29 years), increased hopelessness, mental disorders, and
negative life events have been shown to be important factors contributing to suicide
in this population (Zhang, Li, Tu, Xiao,
& Jia, 2011). Moreover, losing their means of livelihood after the
disaster may have exacerbated their grief (Li, Chow, Shi, & Chan , 2015), which could be a risk factor
for suicidality (Latham & Prigerson,
2004).We found a steep decrease in suicide rates among middle-aged male adults, especially
those aged 30–69 years in evacuation areas, but not in females. Suicide rates among
men are reportedly associated with economic circumstances, such as increased
unemployment and bankruptcy (Aihara &
Iki, 2003; Yamasaki et al.,
2008). One study regarding the 2008 global economic recession and suicide
reported that men aged 45–64 years were most affected in European and North and
South American countries (Chang, Stuckler,
Yip, & Gunnell, 2013). Therefore, the decline in suicide rates in
this age category may have contributed to the declining male suicide rates in the
second postdisaster period (March 2012 to February 2013). However, there is often a
decrease in nonfatal suicidal behavior in the immediate aftermath of a disaster,
which is referred to as the honeymoon period (Madianos & Evi, 2010). Another study reported that the
feeling of pulling together during a natural disaster can reduce interpersonal risk
factors associated with the desire for suicide (Gordon, Bresin, Dombeck, Routledge, & Wonderlich, 2011).
Following the Great East Japan Earthquake, more intensive mental health-care
services were provided to evacuees who lived in evacuation areas. Although specific
reasons for trends in suicide rates were not determined in the present study, the
initial decrease in postdisaster suicide rates might be attributed not only to
economic factors, but also to the aforementioned phenomena and intensive mental
health-care activities.In the present study, changes in suicide rates differed between total evacuation
areas and terminated/partial evacuation areas. However, male suicide rates in total
evacuation areas decreased steeply after the disaster as compared with
terminated/partial evacuation areas. In particular, the decrease in suicide rates
among those aged 30–69 years was prominent in total evacuation areas.One possible explanation is that residents in evacuation areas (i.e., those who lived
near the nuclear power plant) were financially compensated for nuclear damages,
including mental damage caused by evacuation, loss of income, and damage to
agriculture, forestry, fishery, and food industries after the nuclear disaster
(TEPCO, Dec 15, 2017).
According to Fukushima prefectural government reports, the rates of households
receiving public assistance decreased steeply after the disaster in Soso county,
which includes all seven municipalities designated as total evacuation areas (from
0.37% in 2011 to 0.07% in 2014). On the other hand, the rates of households
receiving public assistance did not decrease after the disaster in Tamura City and
Minami-Soma City, whose residents account for 82% of the population in
terminated/partial evacuation areas (Tamura City, 0.59% in 2011 to 0.54% in 2014;
Minami-Soma City, 0.35% in 2011 to 0.32% in 2014). While residents of total
evacuation areas could all receive financial compensation, only some residents in
terminated/partial evacuation areas (i.e., those who lived in areas subject to
ongoing evacuation) were provided with such aid. Provision of financial compensation
for evacuees will end when radiation hazard regulations are removed, and
consequently, economic circumstances may worsen relative to the current state. This
could possibly lead to increased suicide rates in evacuation areas, especially in
total evacuation areas. Moreover, long-term evacuation orders are unique to nuclear
disasters, as compared with other natural disasters. In fact, residents of areas
near the nuclear plant remain under evacuation from their homes, with almost 80,000
people unable to return to their homes (as of February 2017). These individuals may
face difficult choices regarding whether or not to return to their hometown when
radiation hazard regulations are removed. Numerous conflicts may arise not only from
radiation concerns, but also due to the lack of employment opportunities,
educational services, medical/nursing care services, and commercial facilities.
Given the increase in male suicide rates in terminated/partial evacuation areas
during the recent postdisaster period, careful observation will be needed, and
active postdisaster mental health services should be provided continuously to
prevent a future rise in suicide rates.In addition, based on male suicide rates in non-evacuation areas, it might indicate a
temporary decrease, subsequently increasing significantly compared with the national
average. Therefore, careful observation and rigorous implementation of suicide
prevention measures will be required in non-evacuation areas as well.
Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, every victim of the present disaster had
to relocate to areas outside the evacuation zone; therefore, some evacuees might
have changed their certificate of residence information, possibly resulting in an
underestimation of suicide rates. Although 83.3% of victims in evacuation areas were
estimated to have not changed their certificate of residence information, some may
have updated their certificate to non-evacuation areas, which could lead to
increased suicide rates in non-evacuation areas. This rate was calculated as
follows:[(Population as of March 11, 2011) – ∑(2011–2015)(Number of those who
moved in/out) – ∑(2011–2015) (Number of deaths) – ∑(2011–2015)
(Number of births)]/[(Population as of March 11,
2011)) – ∑(2011–2015) (Number of deaths) – ∑(2011–2015) (Number of
births)].Second, data used in this study were limited with respect to terminated/partial
evacuation areas. While evacuation orders were terminated in Hirono Town (as of
April 2012) and Tamura City (as of April 2014), they remain effective in some parts
of Minami-Soma City, Kawamata Town, and Kawauchi Village. Therefore, situations
regarding evacuation orders varied in terminated/partial evacuation areas during the
observation period. In addition, suicide data included deaths by suicide in
non-evacuation areas of municipalities designated as partial evacuation areas, since
the evacuation order designated only parts of Tamura City, Minami-Soma, City,
Kawamata Town, and Kawauchi Village. Therefore, the use of suicide data (by
municipal unit) from vital statistics might be an additional limitation.Third, the national suicide rates of males tended to decline consistently during the
observation period. Therefore, the immediate decrease in suicide rates after the
disaster may have reflected the nationwide decline in suicide rates.Finally, the number of suicides among females and the female population in the
subject area, especially in total evacuation areas, was small. The number of suicide
cases per month was 2 at most (and 7 per year) during the observation period among
the female population of approximately 35,000. This could be the reason why no
significant difference was observed in female suicide rates between total evacuation
areas and the national average.
Conclusion
Despite these limitations, the strength of the present study is that we used data
from vital statistics (e.g., certificate of residence information and age), which
allowed us to track residents who had relocated to non-evacuation areas after the
disaster. Our results confirmed the initial increase in male suicide rates in
evacuation areas. Moreover, a delayed increase in suicide rates was observed in both
genders, highlighting the importance of providing intensive, long-term mental
health-care services following a disaster, given that suicide rates might eventually
increase after major natural disasters (Kõlves, Kõlves, & De Leo, 2013; Matubayashi, Sawada, & Ueda, 2013).
Interestingly, our findings also suggested the possibility that suicide rates will
increase after termination of radiation hazard regulations. These regulations have
already been terminated in the entire area of Kawamata Town and Kawauchi Village,
which were designated as partial evacuation areas in the present study, and in the
majority of areas in Minami-Soma City, Tomioka Town, Katsurao Village, and Iitate
Village. Given the recent increase in suicide rates in these areas, careful
observation of suicide trends will be needed in evacuation areas and non-evacuation
areas, while providing active and continuous postdisaster mental health services to
prevent future increases in suicide rates. We hope our findings will provide helpful
insights to disaster mental health service providers.
Authors: Katalin Szanto; Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Barbara J Sahakian; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia R Houck; Charles F Reynolds; Luke Clark Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Masatsugu Orui; Maiko Fukasawa; Naoko Horikoshi; Yuriko Suzuki; Norito Kawakami Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.390