| Literature DB >> 27576848 |
Weimin Wang1, Chong Li1,2,3, Fadi Li1, Xiaojuan Wang1,2, Xiaoxue Zhang1, Ting Liu1, Fang Nian1, Xiangpeng Yue2, Fei Li2, Xiangyu Pan1, Yongfu La1, Futao Mo1, Fangbin Wang1, Baosheng Li4.
Abstract
Early consumption of starter feed promotes rumen development in lambs. We examined rumen development in lambs fed starter feed for 5 weeks using histological and biochemical analyses and by performing high-throughput sequencing in rumen tissues. Additionally, rumen contents of starter feed-fed lambs were compared to those of breast milk-fed controls. Our physiological and biochemical findings revealed that early starter consumption facilitated rumen development, changed the pattern of ruminal fermentation, and increased the amylase and carboxymethylcellulase activities of rumen micro-organisms. RNA-seq analysis revealed 225 differentially expressed genes between the rumens of breast milk- and starter feed-fed lambs. These DEGs were involved in many metabolic pathways, particularly lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and included HMGCL and HMGCS2. Sequencing analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed that ruminal bacterial communities were more diverse in breast milk-than in starter feed-fed lambs, and each group had a distinct microbiota. We conclude that early starter feeding is beneficial to rumen development and physiological function in lambs. The underlying mechanism may involve the stimulation of ruminal ketogenesis and butanoate metabolism via HMGCL and HMGCS2 combined with changes in the fermentation type induced by ruminal microbiota. Overall, this study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of rumen development in sheep.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27576848 PMCID: PMC5006043 DOI: 10.1038/srep32479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Animal performance of Hu sheep used for RNA and metagenomics sequencing.
| Item | Breast milk-fed | Starter feed-fed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth performance | BW (kg) | 8.49 ± 1.94 | 12.05 ± 2.72 | 0.026 | ||
| ADG (g/d) | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.010 | |||
| Rumen morphology | WRR (g) | 98.32 ± 27.59 | 196.72 ± 35.62 | |||
| VRR (mL) | 894.6 ± 320.86 | 1500.7 ± 291.92 | ||||
| PH (μm) | 659.40 ± 19.97 | 1003.33 ± 24.95 | ||||
| PW (μm) | 624.74 ± 40.02 | 474.90 ± 18.79 | 0.053 | |||
| MT (μm) | 807.45 ± 35.26 | 849.62 ± 39.59 | 0.429 | |||
| Rumen fermentation parameters | pH | 5.91 ± 0.10 | 5.30 ± 0.04 | 0.130 | ||
| Total VFA (mmol/L) | 33.05 ± 5.52 | 113.24 ± 7.99 | ||||
| VFA proportion (mol/100 mol) | Acetate (A) | 58.45 ± 9.24 | 50.67 ± 5.64 | |||
| Propionate (P) | 26.98 ± 5.13 | 32.05 ± 6.63 | ||||
| Butyrate | 8.65 ± 1.50 | 11.78 ± 2.66 | ||||
| Isobutyrate | 0.97 ± 0.81 | 0.31 ± 0.23 | ||||
| Valerate | 2.63 ± 1.21 | 3.84 ± 0.96 | ||||
| Isovalerate | 2.32 ± 2.07 | 1.34 ± 1.22 | 0.152 | |||
| A:P | 2.32 ± 0.88 | 1.67 ± 0.49 | ||||
| ruminal metabolic parameters (mg/100 mL) | Nitrogen | 929.44 ± 290.70 | 4267.08 ± 558.99 | |||
| Ammonium nitrogen | 13.48 ± 3.55 | 22.66 ± 1.70 | ||||
| Urea nitrogen | 2.68 ± 0.04 | 8.97 ± 1.44 | ||||
| Protein nitrogen | 913.29 ± 236.48 | 4235.44 ± 423.10 | ||||
| Enzymes activity of rumen microorganisms | Proteinase (U/mg) | 0.017 ± 0.001 | 0.007 ± 0.000 | |||
| Amylase (U/mg) | 0.294 ± 0.021 | 0.585 ± 0.034 | ||||
| carboxymethylcellulase (U/mg) | 0.019 ± 0.002 | 0.034 ± 0.001 | ||||
BW – body weight. ADG –average daily gain. WRR –weight of the reticulo-rumen. VRR –volume of the reticulo-rumen. PH –papilla height of the rumen. PW –papilla width of the rumen. MT –muscular thickness of the rumen. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test.
Figure 1Average linkage hierarchical clustering analysis of the log2 transformed change ratio of 18,716 unigenes generated with Cluster 3.0 software.
Data are shown in a tree analysis generated using the software package Java Treeview. Each row represents a differentially expressed gene and each column represents a sample. Green and red colour gradients indicate a reduction or increase in transcript abundance, respectively.
List of 20 rumen DEGs between Hu sheep that received starter feed or breast milk.
| Gene | Starter feed-fed | Breast milk-fed | FC (S/B) | Full name | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.30 | 1998.39 | −56.61 | 4.76E-02 | Glycoprotein (transmenbrane) nmb | |
| 92.20 | 4519.14 | −49.01 | 3.64E-04 | Keratin 4, type II | |
| 4.04 | 110.80 | −27.42 | 1.06E-02 | — | |
| 1.23 | 31.40 | −25.57 | 4.34E-02 | T cell receptor delta constant | |
| 1.55 | 36.35 | −23.43 | 4.14E-02 | — | |
| 2.85 | 58.12 | −20.41 | 1.91E-02 | Serglycin | |
| 7.71 | 148.34 | −19.23 | 1.41E-02 | Regulator of G-protein signaling 4 | |
| 2.20 | 40.02 | −18.19 | 4.80E-02 | FGR proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase | |
| 2.80 | 50.11 | −17.88 | 9.10E-03 | Neurexophilin and PC-esterase domain family, member 2 | |
| 332.15 | 4734.76 | −14.25 | 2.02E-06 | — | |
| 1.86 | 229.54 | 123.39 | 3.03E-07 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIIC | |
| 0.23 | 32.03 | 137.98 | 1.20E-02 | — | |
| 0.31 | 53.46 | 172.41 | 1.58E-02 | Myosin, light chain 10, regulatory | |
| 182.28 | 31458.78 | 172.59 | 6.24E-03 | — | |
| 242.21 | 56941.99 | 235.09 | 6.97E-03 | — | |
| 5.05 | 1532.46 | 303.38 | 1.25E-02 | Ribosomal protein | |
| 1.20 | 372.79 | 311.68 | 2.13E-02 | — | |
| 0.65 | 239.04 | 366.04 | 3.50E-02 | — | |
| 1.23 | 626.32 | 509.61 | 5.94E-03 | — | |
| 0.31 | 295.88 | 954.32 | 4.82E-02 | — |
Figure 2Validation of differentially expressed genes in the rumen from breast milk-and starter feed-fed lambs.
The qPCR measurements of the expression of Cox8c, SLC14A1, Serpinb1, ECM2, KRT4, HMGCL, and HMGCS2 mRNA transcripts were analysed using the ΔΔCt method; *significant difference between the groups of lambs.
Figure 3Gene ontology (GO) classification of differentially expressed genes.
The red line indicates P = 0.05. Details of the GO enrichment analysis are presented in Supplementary Table S5.
Figure 4KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes.
The red line indicates P = 0.05. Details of the KEGG enrichment analysis can be found in Supplementary Table S6.
Alpha diversity measures of bacterial communities in the ruminal contents between the starter feed- and breast milk-fed groups.
| Alpha diversity index | Breast milk-fed | Starter feed-fed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | 1601.7 ± 108.5 | 798.0 ± 65.6 | <0.001 |
| Chao | 1940.8 ± 110.8 | 972.7 ± 65.1 | <0.001 |
| ACE | 2045.8 ± 117.1 | 1019.3 ± 67.6 | <0.001 |
| Simpson | 0.024 ± 0.004 | 0.104 ± 0.031 | 0.028 |
| Shannon | 5.560 ± 0.172 | 3.878 ± 0.283 | <0.001 |
| Coverage | 0.961 ± 0.002 | 0.986 ± 0.002 | <0.001 |
Phylum-level taxonomic composition of bacterial communities in the ruminal contents between the starter feed- and breast milk-fed groups.
| Phylum | % of sequences in starter feed-fed group | % of sequences in breast milk-fed group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.132 ± 0.072 | 0.335 ± 0.226 | 0.413 | |
| 66.007 ± 4.187 | 58.471 ± 1.385 | 0.118 | |
| 0.084 ± 0.050 | 0.769 ± 0.279 | ||
| 19.367 ± 3.551 | 14.99 ± 1.484 | 0.283 | |
| 0.119 ± 0.088 | 3.265 ± 0.752 | ||
| 2.593 ± 1.231 | 6.016 ± 1.441 | 0.101 | |
| 4.690 ± 1.202 | 9.583 ± 4.780 | 0.344 | |
| 1.200 ± 0.450 | 1.070 ± 0.529 | 0.862 | |
| 0.677 ± 0.004 | 1.186 ± 0.335 | 0.363 | |
| 0.149 ± 0.146 | 7.481 ± 2.762 | ||
| Unclassified | 0 | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.154 |
| Others (<0.5%) | 0.088 ± 0.067 | 1.715 ± 0.290 | <0.001 |
Genus-level taxonomic composition of the bacterial communities in the ruminal contents between the starter feed- and breast milk-fed groups.
| Phylum | Genus | % of sequences in starter feed-fed group | % of sequences in breast milk-fed group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40.370 ± 9.576 | 17.196 ± 5.925 | 0.067 | ||
| 0.064 ± 0.000 | 1.613 ± 0.553 | |||
| 0.084 ± 0.050 | 0.750 ± 0.277 | |||
| 0.821 ± 0.241 | 0.328 ± 0.075 | 0.079 | ||
| 3.240 ± 2.658 | 0.441 ± 0.123 | 0.318 | ||
| 1.580 ± 0.426 | 0.001 ± 0.001 | |||
| 3.721 ± 1.777 | 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.063 | ||
| 5.043 ± 1.399 | 0.765 ± 0.223 | |||
| 2.512 ± 1.875 | 0.011 ± 0.006 | 0.210 | ||
| 0.006 ± 0.006 | 0.923 ± 0.473 | 0.081 | ||
| 0.014 ± 0.007 | 1.420 ± 0.632 | |||
| 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.864 ± 0.549 | 0.147 | ||
| 1.981 ± 1.178 | 1.014 ± 0.988 | 0.544 | ||
| 6.617 ± 4.016 | 1.364 ± 0.537 | 0.224 | ||
| 2.964 ± 2.951 | 3.187 ± 1.423 | 0.947 | ||
| 1.048 ± 0.490 | 0.213 ± 0.060 | 0.122 | ||
| 0 | 0.567 ± 0.325 | 0.112 | ||
| Unclassified (Genus) | 27.919 ± 8.595 | 53.156 ± 6.044 | ||
| Others (<0.5%) | 0.019 ± 0.004 | 0.157 ± 0.027 | ||
Figure 5Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of ruminal bacterial OTUs between the starter feed- and breast milk-fed groups.
qPCR results for total bacteria, two phyla, and four genera of ruminal bacterial communities in the starter feed- and breast milk-fed groups.
| Taxon | Abundance of bacteria | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter feed-fed group | Breast milk-fed group | ||
| 30.76 ± 2.77 | 5.23 ± 1.25 | ||
| 16.38 ± 1.13 | 3.12 ± 0.77 | ||
| 3.90 ± 1.24 | 0.87 ± 0.30 | ||
| 11.53 ± 4.46 | 0.66 ± 0.43 | ||
| 0.22 ± 0.20 | 0.0015 ± 0.00075 | 0.285 | |
| 0.02 ± 0.004 | 0.009 ± 0.003 | ||
| 0.195 ± 0.052 | 0.0017 ± 0.00083 | ||
aThe abundance of total bacteria is expressed as 1010 copy numbers per gram of rumen content.
Figure 6Coefficients of correlation between the relative abundances of ruminal bacterial genera and functional variables.