Literature DB >> 25068856

Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency.

Aaron Veldre1, Sally Andrews1.   

Abstract

The boundary paradigm was used to investigate individual differences in the extraction of lexical information from the parafovea in sentence reading. The preview of a target word was manipulated so that it was identical (e.g., sped), a higher frequency orthographic neighbor (seed), a nonword neighbor (sted), or an all-letter-different nonword (glat). Ninety-four skilled adult readers were assessed on measures of reading and spelling ability. The results showed that null effects of preview lexical status in the average data obscured systematic differences on the basis of proficiency and target neighborhood density. For targets from dense neighborhoods, inhibition from a higher frequency neighbor preview occurred among highly proficient readers, and particularly those with superior spelling ability, in early fixation measures. Poorer readers showed inhibition only in second-pass reading of the target. These data suggest that readers with precise lexical representations are more likely to extract lexical information from a word before it is fixated. The implications for computational models of eye movements in reading are discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068856     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  9 in total

1.  From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Karen Emmorey; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Event-related brain potentials reveal how multiple aspects of semantic processing unfold across parafoveal and foveal vision during sentence reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Do Morphemes Matter when Reading Compound Words with Transposed Letters? Evidence from Eye-Tracking and Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Out of the corner of my eye: Foveal semantic load modulates parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Mallory C Stites; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Event-related brain potentials reveal age-related changes in parafoveal-foveal integration during sentence processing.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Klara Gregorova; Julius Golch; Stefan Hawelka; Jona Sassenhagen; Alessandro Tavano; David Poeppel; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-12-06

8.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

9.  Attention extends beyond single words in beginning readers.

Authors:  Joshua Snell; Christophe Cauchi; Jonathan Grainger; Bernard Lété
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.