Literature DB >> 27576149

Potential aquifer vulnerability in regions down-gradient from uranium in situ recovery (ISR) sites.

James A Saunders1, Bruce E Pivetz2, Nathan Voorhies3, Richard T Wilkin4.   

Abstract

Sandstone-hosted roll-front uranium ore deposits originate when U(VI) dissolved in groundwater is reduced and precipitated as insoluble U(IV) minerals. Groundwater redox geochemistry, aqueous complexation, and solute migration are important in leaching uranium from source rocks and transporting it in low concentrations to a chemical redox interface where it is deposited in an ore zone typically containing the uranium minerals uraninite, pitchblende, and/or coffinite; various iron sulfides; native selenium; clays; and calcite. In situ recovery (ISR) of uranium ores is a process of contacting the uranium mineral deposit with leaching and oxidizing (lixiviant) fluids via injection of the lixiviant into wells drilled into the subsurface aquifer that hosts uranium ore, while other extraction wells pump the dissolved uranium after dissolution of the uranium minerals. Environmental concerns during and after ISR include water quality degradation from: 1) potential excursions of leaching solutions away from the injection zone into down-gradient, underlying, or overlying aquifers; 2) potential migration of uranium and its decay products (e.g., Ra, Rn, Pb); and, 3) potential mobilization and migration of redox-sensitive trace metals (e.g., Fe, Mn, Mo, Se, V), metalloids (e.g., As), and anions (e.g., sulfate). This review describes the geochemical processes that control roll-front uranium transport and fate in groundwater systems, identifies potential aquifer vulnerabilities to ISR operations, identifies data gaps in mitigating these vulnerabilities, and discusses the hydrogeological characterization involved in developing a monitoring program. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater monitoring; Hydrogeology; In situ leaching; Roll-front deposits; Trace metal mobilization; Uranium fate and transport; Uranium geochemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576149      PMCID: PMC7316075          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  23 in total

1.  Isotopic and Geochemical Tracers for U(VI) Reduction and U Mobility at an in Situ Recovery U Mine.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; Shaun T Brown; John N Christensen; Donald J DePaolo; Paul W Reimus; Jeffrey M Heikoop; Giday Woldegabriel; Ardyth M Simmons; Brian M House; Matt Hartmann; Kate Maher
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Determination of the formation constants of ternary complexes of uranyl and carbonate with alkaline earth metals (Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+) using anion exchange method.

Authors:  Wenming Dong; Scott C Brooks
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Isotopic Evidence for Reductive Immobilization of Uranium Across a Roll-Front Mineral Deposit.

Authors:  Shaun T Brown; Anirban Basu; John N Christensen; Paul Reimus; Jeffrey Heikoop; Ardyth Simmons; Giday Woldegabriel; Kate Maher; Karrie Weaver; James Clay; Donald J DePaolo
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Solubility of schoepite: comparison and selection of complexation constants for U(VI).

Authors:  Je-Hun Jang; Brian A Dempsey; William D Burgos
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Simultaneous reduction of arsenic(V) and uranium(VI) by mackinawite: role of uranyl arsenate precipitate formation.

Authors:  Lyndsay D Troyer; Yuanzhi Tang; Thomas Borch
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Relative reactivity of biogenic and chemogenic uraninite and biogenic noncrystalline U(IV).

Authors:  José M Cerrato; Matthew N Ashner; Daniel S Alessi; Juan S Lezama-Pacheco; Rizlan Bernier-Latmani; John R Bargar; Daniel E Giammar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Biological reduction of uranium in groundwater and subsurface soil.

Authors:  A Abdelouas; W Lutze; W Gong; E H Nuttall; B A Strietelmeier; B J Travis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-04-24       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  In situ chemical reduction of Cr(VI) in groundwater using a combination of ferrous sulfate and sodium dithionite: a field investigation.

Authors:  Ralph D Ludwig; Chunming Su; Tony R Lee; Richard T Wilkin; Steven D Acree; Randall R Ross; Ann Keeley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction.

Authors:  D R Lovley
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-06

10.  Uranium speciation in drinking water from drilled wells in southern Finland and its potential links to health effects.

Authors:  Odette Prat; Thomas Vercouter; Eric Ansoborlo; Pascal Fichet; Pascale Perret; Päivi Kurttio; Laina Salonen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Solution equilibria of uranyl minerals: Role of the common groundwater ions calcium and carbonate.

Authors:  Dovie M Stanley; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.588

2.  Effect of Bicarbonate, Calcium, and pH on the Reactivity of As(V) and U(VI) Mixtures.

Authors:  Jorge Gonzalez-Estrella; Isabel Meza; Annie Jane Burns; Abdul-Mehdi S Ali; Juan S Lezama-Pacheco; Peter Lichtner; Nabil Shaikh; Scott Fendorf; José M Cerrato
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.