Literature DB >> 31173981

Solution equilibria of uranyl minerals: Role of the common groundwater ions calcium and carbonate.

Dovie M Stanley1, Richard T Wilkin2.   

Abstract

Understanding the factors that govern aqueous solubility of uranyl minerals is important for predicting uranium mobility in groundwater and for designing effective remediation strategies. The uranyl-containing minerals metaschoepite [UO3∙(2H2O)] and uranophane [Ca(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2·5H2O] were synthesized and evaluated in batch solubility experiments conducted in the presence of common groundwater ions: calcium, bicarbonate/carbonate, and dissolved silica. Solid-phase characterization revealed the expected structural and thermogravimetric properties of metaschoepite and uranophane. Metaschoepite solubility in carbonate-free water followed a u-shaped pH dependency with minimum solubility near pH 8.5; uranium concentrations at pH ≳ 8.5 were approximately equivalent to the reference value for safe drinking water established by the EPA (30 μg/L). With increasing bicarbonate/carbonate concentration (1 mM - 50 mM) the solubility of metaschoepite increased, presumably due to the formation of uranyl-carbonate complexes. However, the experimental concentrations of uranium were lower than concentrations predicted from accepted complexation constants. For uranophane, equilibrium uranium concentrations were < 75 μg/L at typical groundwater concentrations of calcium and dissolved silica (pH > 7). The diversity of uranyl minerals that possibly form in the presence of common groundwater species: Ca-Mg-Na-K-Si-bicarbonate/carbonate-sulfate-chloride, has not been fully explored with respect to understanding potential mineral transformations and impacts on uranium solubility and mobility. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groundwater; Metaschoepite; Remediation; Uranium; Uranophane

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173981      PMCID: PMC7369140          DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  13 in total

1.  Uranium Isotopic Fractionation Induced by U(VI) Adsorption onto Common Aquifer Minerals.

Authors:  N E Jemison; T M Johnson; A E Shiel; C C Lundstrom
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Potential for U sequestration with select minerals and sediments via base treatment.

Authors:  Hilary P Emerson; Silvina Di Pietro; Yelena Katsenovich; Jim Szecsody
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 3.  Potential aquifer vulnerability in regions down-gradient from uranium in situ recovery (ISR) sites.

Authors:  James A Saunders; Bruce E Pivetz; Nathan Voorhies; Richard T Wilkin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Solubility of schoepite: comparison and selection of complexation constants for U(VI).

Authors:  Je-Hun Jang; Brian A Dempsey; William D Burgos
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Occurrence of uranium in Swiss drinking water.

Authors:  E Stalder; A Blanc; M Haldimann; V Dudler
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Modeling of geochemical processes related to uranium mobilization in the groundwater of a uranium mine.

Authors:  P Gómez; A Garralón; B Buil; Ma J Turrero; L Sánchez; B de la Cruz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Ex situ groundwater treatment triggering the mobilization of geogenic uranium from aquifer sediments.

Authors:  Andre Banning; Nadine Pawletko; Julia Röder; Christine Kübeck; Frank Wisotzky
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Impact of uranyl-calcium-carbonato complexes on uranium(VI) adsorption to synthetic and natural sediments.

Authors:  Brandy D Stewart; Melanie A Mayes; Scott Fendorf
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Influence of dissolved sodium and cesium on uranyl oxide hydrate solubility.

Authors:  Daniel E Giammar; Janet G Hering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Uranium speciation in drinking water from drilled wells in southern Finland and its potential links to health effects.

Authors:  Odette Prat; Thomas Vercouter; Eric Ansoborlo; Pascal Fichet; Pascale Perret; Päivi Kurttio; Laina Salonen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tracing geochemical sources and health risk assessment of uranium in groundwater of arid zone of India.

Authors:  P Pandit; Atul Saini; Sabarathinam Chidambaram; Vinod Kumar; Banjarani Panda; A L Ramanathan; Netrananda Sahu; A K Singh; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Sociodemographic inequalities in uranium and other metals in community water systems across the USA, 2006-11: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Filippo Ravalli; Yuanzhi Yu; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Kathrin Schilling; Anirban Basu; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2022-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.