Magdalene M Assimon1, Julia B Wenger2, Lily Wang3, Jennifer E Flythe4. 1. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: jflythe@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observational data have demonstrated an association between higher ultrafiltration rates and greater mortality among hemodialysis patients. Prior studies were small and did not consider potential differences in the association across body sizes and other related subgroups. No study has investigated ultrafiltration rates normalized to anthropometric measures beyond body weight. Also, potential methodological shortcomings in prior studies have led to questions about the veracity of the ultrafiltration rate-mortality association. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 118,394 hemodialysis patients dialyzing in a large dialysis organization, 2008 to 2012. PREDICTORS: Mean 30-day ultrafiltration rates were dichotomized at 13 and 10mL/h/kg, separately and categorized using various cutoff points. Ultrafiltration rates normalized to body weight, body mass index, and body surface area were investigated. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable survival models were used to estimate the association between ultrafiltration rate and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, 21,735 (18.4%) individuals had ultrafiltration rates > 13mL/h/kg and 48,529 (41.0%) had ultrafiltration rates > 10mL/h/kg. Median follow-up was 2.3 years, and the mortality rate was 15.3 deaths/100 patient-years. Compared with ultrafiltration rates ≤ 13mL/h/kg, ultrafiltration rates > 13mL/h/kg were associated with greater mortality (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28-1.34). Compared with ultrafiltration rates ≤ 10mL/h/kg, ultrafiltration rates > 10mL/h/kg were associated with greater mortality (adjusted HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24). Findings were consistent across subgroups of sex, race, dialysis vintage, session duration, and body size. Higher ultrafiltration rates were associated with greater mortality when normalized to body weight, body mass index, and body surface area. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding cannot be excluded given the observational study design. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the threshold implemented, higher ultrafiltration rate was associated with greater mortality in the overall study population and across key subgroups. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate whether ultrafiltration rate reduction improves clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Observational data have demonstrated an association between higher ultrafiltration rates and greater mortality among hemodialysis patients. Prior studies were small and did not consider potential differences in the association across body sizes and other related subgroups. No study has investigated ultrafiltration rates normalized to anthropometric measures beyond body weight. Also, potential methodological shortcomings in prior studies have led to questions about the veracity of the ultrafiltration rate-mortality association. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 118,394 hemodialysis patients dialyzing in a large dialysis organization, 2008 to 2012. PREDICTORS: Mean 30-day ultrafiltration rates were dichotomized at 13 and 10mL/h/kg, separately and categorized using various cutoff points. Ultrafiltration rates normalized to body weight, body mass index, and body surface area were investigated. OUTCOMES: All-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable survival models were used to estimate the association between ultrafiltration rate and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, 21,735 (18.4%) individuals had ultrafiltration rates > 13mL/h/kg and 48,529 (41.0%) had ultrafiltration rates > 10mL/h/kg. Median follow-up was 2.3 years, and the mortality rate was 15.3 deaths/100 patient-years. Compared with ultrafiltration rates ≤ 13mL/h/kg, ultrafiltration rates > 13mL/h/kg were associated with greater mortality (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28-1.34). Compared with ultrafiltration rates ≤ 10mL/h/kg, ultrafiltration rates > 10mL/h/kg were associated with greater mortality (adjusted HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.20-1.24). Findings were consistent across subgroups of sex, race, dialysis vintage, session duration, and body size. Higher ultrafiltration rates were associated with greater mortality when normalized to body weight, body mass index, and body surface area. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding cannot be excluded given the observational study design. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the threshold implemented, higher ultrafiltration rate was associated with greater mortality in the overall study population and across key subgroups. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate whether ultrafiltration rate reduction improves clinical outcomes.
Keywords:
Hemodialysis; anthropometric measures; body mass index (BMI); body size; body surface area (BSA); body weight; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); metabolic mass; mortality; rapid fluid removal; ultrafiltration rate (UFR)
Authors: Christopher W McIntyre; Laura E A Harrison; M Tarek Eldehni; Helen J Jefferies; Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Stephen G John; Mhairi K Sigrist; James O Burton; Daljit Hothi; Shvan Korsheed; Paul J Owen; Ka-Bik Lai; Philip K T Li Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Allan J Collins; Robert N Foley; Blanche Chavers; David Gilbertson; Charles Herzog; Areef Ishani; Kirsten Johansen; Bertram L Kasiske; Nancy Kutner; Jiannong Liu; Wendy St Peter; Haifeng Guo; Yan Hu; Allyson Kats; Shuling Li; Suying Li; Julia Maloney; Tricia Roberts; Melissa Skeans; Jon Snyder; Craig Solid; Bryn Thompson; Eric Weinhandl; Hui Xiong; Akeem Yusuf; David Zaun; Cheryl Arko; Shu-Cheng Chen; Frank Daniels; James Ebben; Eric Frazier; Roger Johnson; Daniel Sheets; Xinyue Wang; Beth Forrest; Delaney Berrini; Edward Constantini; Susan Everson; Paul Eggers; Lawrence Agodoa Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: James O Burton; Helen J Jefferies; Nicholas M Selby; Christopher W McIntyre Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Surekha Mullangi; Stephen M Sozio; Paul Segal; Steven Menez; Carol Martire; Tariq Shafi Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Laura Sola; Nathan W Levin; David W Johnson; Roberto Pecoits-Filho; Harith M Aljubori; Yuqing Chen; Stefaan Claus; Allan Collins; Brett Cullis; John Feehally; Paul N Harden; Mohamed H Hassan; Fuad Ibhais; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Adeera Levin; Abdulkarim Saleh; Daneil Schneditz; Irma Tchokhonelidze; Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu; Ahmed Twahir; Robert Walker; Anthony J O Were; Xueqing Yu; Fredric O Finkelstein Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Date: 2020-02-19