Literature DB >> 32149009

Development of a framework for minimum and optimal safety and quality standards for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Laura Sola1, Nathan W Levin2, David W Johnson3,4,5, Roberto Pecoits-Filho6,7, Harith M Aljubori8, Yuqing Chen9,10,11, Stefaan Claus12, Allan Collins13,14, Brett Cullis15, John Feehally16, Paul N Harden17, Mohamed H Hassan18, Fuad Ibhais19, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh20, Adeera Levin21, Abdulkarim Saleh22, Daneil Schneditz23, Irma Tchokhonelidze24, Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu25, Ahmed Twahir26,27, Robert Walker28, Anthony J O Were29,30,31, Xueqing Yu32,33, Fredric O Finkelstein34.   

Abstract

Substantial heterogeneity in practice patterns around the world has resulted in wide variations in the quality and type of dialysis care delivered. This is particularly so in countries without universal standards of care and governmental (or other organizational) oversight. Most high-income countries have developed such oversight based on documentation of adherence to standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Many low- and lower-middle-income countries have no or only limited organized oversight systems to ensure that care is safe and effective. The implementation and oversight of basic standards of care requires sufficient infrastructure and appropriate workforce and financial resources to support the basic levels of care and safety practices. It is important to understand how these standards then can be reasonably adapted and applied in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
© 2020 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  hemodialysis; minimum safety standards; peritoneal dialysis; quality of care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32149009      PMCID: PMC7031684          DOI: 10.1016/j.kisu.2019.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)        ISSN: 2157-1716


  66 in total

1.  Rapid fluid removal during dialysis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Stephen E Kimmel; Steven M Brunelli
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  A Syllabus for Teaching Peritoneal Dialysis to Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Ana E Figueiredo; Judith Bernardini; Elaine Bowes; Miki Hiramatsu; Valerie Price; Chunyan Su; Rachael Walker; Gillian Brunier
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Techniques for the assessment of volume status in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  Mitchell H Rosner; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives to Sustainably Reduce Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Melissa Nataatmadja; Yeoungjee Cho; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Time to Rethink Our Approach to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for ESRD.

Authors:  Fredric O Finkelstein; Susan H Finkelstein
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 7.  PD First Policy: Thailand's Response to the Challenge of Meeting the Needs of Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.

Authors:  Piyatida Chuengsaman; Vijj Kasemsup
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.299

8.  Phosphate-Binding Agents in Adults With CKD: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Sharon Gardner; Marcello Tonelli; Dimitris Mavridis; David W Johnson; Jonathan C Craig; Richard French; Marinella Ruospo; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

Authors:  Donna L Mapes; Antonio Alberto Lopes; Sudtida Satayathum; Keith P McCullough; David A Goodkin; Francesco Locatelli; Shunichi Fukuhara; Eric W Young; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Akira Saito; Jürgen Bommer; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 10.  How to meet the demand for good quality renal dialysis as part of universal health coverage in resource-limited settings?

Authors:  Yot Teerawattananon; Alia Luz; Songyot Pilasant; Suteenoot Tangsathitkulchai; Sarocha Chootipongchaivat; Nattha Tritasavit; Inthira Yamabhai; Sripen Tantivess
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-03-18
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative study on the efficacy of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Xu; Xue Han; Yi Yang; Xu Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 2.  Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes.

Authors:  Aminu K Bello; Ikechi G Okpechi; Mohamed A Osman; Yeoungjee Cho; Htay Htay; Vivekanand Jha; Marina Wainstein; David W Johnson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 42.439

3.  Challenges for Peritoneal Dialysis Centers Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico.

Authors:  Diana Perez-Moran; Ricardo Perez-Cuevas; Svetlana V Doubova
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.323

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.