| Literature DB >> 32149009 |
Laura Sola1, Nathan W Levin2, David W Johnson3,4,5, Roberto Pecoits-Filho6,7, Harith M Aljubori8, Yuqing Chen9,10,11, Stefaan Claus12, Allan Collins13,14, Brett Cullis15, John Feehally16, Paul N Harden17, Mohamed H Hassan18, Fuad Ibhais19, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh20, Adeera Levin21, Abdulkarim Saleh22, Daneil Schneditz23, Irma Tchokhonelidze24, Rumeyza Turan Kazancioglu25, Ahmed Twahir26,27, Robert Walker28, Anthony J O Were29,30,31, Xueqing Yu32,33, Fredric O Finkelstein34.
Abstract
Substantial heterogeneity in practice patterns around the world has resulted in wide variations in the quality and type of dialysis care delivered. This is particularly so in countries without universal standards of care and governmental (or other organizational) oversight. Most high-income countries have developed such oversight based on documentation of adherence to standardized, evidence-based guidelines. Many low- and lower-middle-income countries have no or only limited organized oversight systems to ensure that care is safe and effective. The implementation and oversight of basic standards of care requires sufficient infrastructure and appropriate workforce and financial resources to support the basic levels of care and safety practices. It is important to understand how these standards then can be reasonably adapted and applied in low- and lower-middle-income countries.Keywords: hemodialysis; minimum safety standards; peritoneal dialysis; quality of care
Year: 2020 PMID: 32149009 PMCID: PMC7031684 DOI: 10.1016/j.kisu.2019.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int Suppl (2011) ISSN: 2157-1716