Magdalene M Assimon1, Jennifer E Flythe. 1. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Frequent blood pressure (BP) measurements are necessary to ensure patient safety during hemodialysis treatments. Intradialytic BPs are not optimal tools for hypertension diagnosis and cardiovascular risk stratification, but they do have critical clinical and prognostic significance. We present evidence associating intradialytic BP phenomena including fall, rise and variability with adverse clinical outcomes and review related pathophysiologic mechanisms and potential management strategies. SUMMARY: Observational studies demonstrate associations between intradialytic hypotension, hypertension and BP variability and mortality. Lack of consensus regarding diagnostic criteria has hampered data synthesis, and prospective studies investigating optimal management strategies for BP phenomena are lacking. Mechanistic data suggest that cardiac, gut, kidney and brain ischemia may lie on the causal pathway between intradialytic hypotension and mortality, and endothelial cell dysfunction, among other factors, may be an important mediator of intradialytic hypertension and adverse outcomes. These plausible pathophysiologic links present potential therapeutic targets for future inquiry. The phenomenon of intradialytic BP variability has not been adequately studied, and practical clinical measures and treatment strategies are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: Intradialytic BP phenomena have important prognostic bearing. Clinical practice guidelines for both intradialytic hypotension and hypertension exist, but their underlying evidence is weak overall. Further research is needed to develop consensus diagnostic criteria for intradialytic hypotension, hypertension and BP variability and to elucidate optimal treatment and prevention strategies for each BP manifestation.
BACKGROUND: Frequent blood pressure (BP) measurements are necessary to ensure patient safety during hemodialysis treatments. Intradialytic BPs are not optimal tools for hypertension diagnosis and cardiovascular risk stratification, but they do have critical clinical and prognostic significance. We present evidence associating intradialytic BP phenomena including fall, rise and variability with adverse clinical outcomes and review related pathophysiologic mechanisms and potential management strategies. SUMMARY: Observational studies demonstrate associations between intradialytic hypotension, hypertension and BP variability and mortality. Lack of consensus regarding diagnostic criteria has hampered data synthesis, and prospective studies investigating optimal management strategies for BP phenomena are lacking. Mechanistic data suggest that cardiac, gut, kidney and brain ischemia may lie on the causal pathway between intradialytic hypotension and mortality, and endothelial cell dysfunction, among other factors, may be an important mediator of intradialytic hypertension and adverse outcomes. These plausible pathophysiologic links present potential therapeutic targets for future inquiry. The phenomenon of intradialytic BP variability has not been adequately studied, and practical clinical measures and treatment strategies are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: Intradialytic BP phenomena have important prognostic bearing. Clinical practice guidelines for both intradialytic hypotension and hypertension exist, but their underlying evidence is weak overall. Further research is needed to develop consensus diagnostic criteria for intradialytic hypotension, hypertension and BP variability and to elucidate optimal treatment and prevention strategies for each BP manifestation.
Authors: Flavio M de Paula; Aldo J Peixoto; Luciano V Pinto; David Dorigo; Pedro J M Patricio; Sergio F F Santos Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: G Bazzato; U Coli; S Landini; S Lucatello; A Fracasso; P Morachiello; F Righetto; F Scanferla Journal: Contrib Nephrol Date: 1984 Impact factor: 1.580
Authors: Antonio Santoro; Elena Mancini; Carlo Basile; Luigi Amoroso; Salvatore Di Giulio; Mario Usberti; Giuliano Colasanti; Giuseppe Verzetti; Alessandro Rocco; Enrico Imbasciati; Giovanni Panzetta; Roberto Bolzani; Fabio Grandi; Maurizio Polacchini Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: András Tislér; Katalin Akócsi; Béla Borbás; László Fazakas; Sándor Ferenczi; Sándor Görögh; Imre Kulcsár; Lajos Nagy; József Sámik; János Szegedi; Eszter Tóth; Gyula Wágner; István Kiss Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Jason A Chou; Elani Streja; Danh V Nguyen; Connie M Rhee; Yoshitsugu Obi; Jula K Inrig; Alpesh Amin; Csaba P Kovesdy; John J Sim; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Johanna Kuipers; Loes M Verboom; Karin J R Ipema; Wolter Paans; Wim P Krijnen; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Ralf Westerhuis; Casper F M Franssen Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Jeroen P Kooman; Len A Usvyat; Marijke J E Dekker; Dugan W Maddux; Jochen G Raimann; Frank M van der Sande; Xiaoling Ye; Yuedong Wang; Peter Kotanko Journal: Blood Purif Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 2.614