Literature DB >> 27572722

Specimen Behavior in the Electron Beam.

R M Glaeser1.   

Abstract

It has long been known that cryo-EM specimens are severely damaged by a level of electron exposure that is much lower than what is needed to obtain high-resolution images from single macromolecules. Perhaps less well appreciated in the cryo-EM literature, the vitreous ice in which samples are suspended is equally sensitivity to radiation damage. This chapter provides a review of several fundamental topics such as inelastic scattering of electrons, radiation chemistry, and radiation biology, which-together-can help one to understand why radiation damage occurs so "easily." This chapter also addresses the issue of beam-induced motion that occurs at even lower levels of electron exposure. While specimen charging may be a contributor to this motion, it is argued that both radiation-induced relief of preexisting stress and damage-induced generation of additional stress may be the dominant causes of radiation-induced movement.
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy deposited; Radiation dose; Specimen charging; Specimen damage; Specimen motion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27572722     DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  17 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis.

Authors:  Dmitry Lyumkis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Dawning of a new era in TRP channel structural biology by cryo-electron microscopy.

Authors:  M Gregor Madej; Christine M Ziegler
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Emerging Themes in CryoEM─Single Particle Analysis Image Processing.

Authors:  Jose Luis Vilas; Jose Maria Carazo; Carlos Oscar S Sorzano
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 4.  Conquer by cryo-EM without physically dividing.

Authors:  Gabriel C Lander; Robert M Glaeser
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.919

5.  Design of a molecular support for cryo-EM structure determination.

Authors:  Thomas G Martin; Tanmay A M Bharat; Andreas C Joerger; Xiao-Chen Bai; Florian Praetorius; Alan R Fersht; Hendrik Dietz; Sjors H W Scheres
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Coming of Age: Cryo-Electron Tomography as a Versatile Tool to Generate High-Resolution Structures at Cellular/Biological Interfaces.

Authors:  Zuoneng Wang; Qingyang Zhang; Carsten Mim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Takanori Nakane; Abhay Kotecha; Andrija Sente; Greg McMullan; Simonas Masiulis; Patricia M G E Brown; Ioana T Grigoras; Lina Malinauskaite; Tomas Malinauskas; Jonas Miehling; Tomasz Uchański; Lingbo Yu; Dimple Karia; Evgeniya V Pechnikova; Erwin de Jong; Jeroen Keizer; Maarten Bischoff; Jamie McCormack; Peter Tiemeijer; Steven W Hardwick; Dimitri Y Chirgadze; Garib Murshudov; A Radu Aricescu; Sjors H W Scheres
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Microscopic charge fluctuations cause minimal contrast loss in cryoEM.

Authors:  Christopher J Russo; Richard Henderson
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  The role of electron irradiation history in liquid cell transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  Trevor H Moser; Hardeep Mehta; Chiwoo Park; Ryan T Kelly; Tolou Shokuhfar; James E Evans
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Electron tomography visualization of HIV-1 fusion with target cells using fusion inhibitors to trap the pre-hairpin intermediate.

Authors:  Mark S Ladinsky; Priyanthi Np Gnanapragasam; Zhi Yang; Anthony P West; Michael S Kay; Pamela J Bjorkman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.