Literature DB >> 27571243

Correlating mammographic and pathologic findings in clinical decision support using natural language processing and data mining methods.

Tejal A Patel1,2,3, Mamta Puppala4,5, Richard O Ogunti4,5, Joe E Ensor1,2, Tiancheng He4,5, Jitesh B Shewale6, Donna P Ankerst7,8, Virginia G Kaklamani9, Angel A Rodriguez1,2,3, Stephen T C Wong2,4,5,10,11, Jenny C Chang1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A key challenge to mining electronic health records for mammography research is the preponderance of unstructured narrative text, which strikingly limits usable output. The imaging characteristics of breast cancer subtypes have been described previously, but without standardization of parameters for data mining.
METHODS: The authors searched the enterprise-wide data warehouse at the Houston Methodist Hospital, the Methodist Environment for Translational Enhancement and Outcomes Research (METEOR), for patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 5 mammogram readings performed between January 2006 and May 2015 and an available pathology report. The authors developed natural language processing (NLP) software algorithms to automatically extract mammographic and pathologic findings from free text mammogram and pathology reports. The correlation between mammographic imaging features and breast cancer subtype was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: The NLP algorithm was able to obtain key characteristics for 543 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors were more likely to have spiculated margins (P = .0008), and those with tumors that overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) were more likely to have heterogeneous and pleomorphic calcifications (P = .0078 and P = .0002, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic imaging characteristics, obtained from an automated text search and the extraction of mammogram reports using NLP techniques, correlated with pathologic breast cancer subtype. The results of the current study validate previously reported trends assessed by manual data collection. Furthermore, NLP provides an automated means with which to scale up data extraction and analysis for clinical decision support. Cancer 2017;114-121.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data mining; imaging characteristics; mammographic to pathologic correlation; natural language processing; subtypes of breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27571243     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  Secretory pathway Ca2+ -ATPases promote in vitro microcalcifications in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Donna Dang; Hari Prasad; Rajini Rao
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Validation of a Semiautomated Natural Language Processing-Based Procedure for Meta-Analysis of Cancer Susceptibility Gene Penetrance.

Authors:  Zhengyi Deng; Kanhua Yin; Yujia Bao; Victor Diego Armengol; Cathy Wang; Ankur Tiwari; Regina Barzilay; Giovanni Parmigiani; Danielle Braun; Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-08

3.  Large Scale Semi-Automated Labeling of Routine Free-Text Clinical Records for Deep Learning.

Authors:  Hari M Trivedi; Maryam Panahiazar; April Liang; Dmytro Lituiev; Peter Chang; Jae Ho Sohn; Yunn-Yi Chen; Benjamin L Franc; Bonnie Joe; Dexter Hadley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Clinical Annotation Research Kit (CLARK): Computable Phenotyping Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Emily R Pfaff; Miles Crosskey; Kenneth Morton; Ashok Krishnamurthy
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 5.  Radiological images and machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects.

Authors:  Zhenwei Zhang; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation.

Authors:  Marzieh Esmaeili; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Marjan Ghazisaeedi; Azin Nahvijou; Keivan Maghooli
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2020-04-01

7.  Prediction of severe chest injury using natural language processing from the electronic health record.

Authors:  Sujay Kulshrestha; Dmitriy Dligach; Cara Joyce; Marshall S Baker; Richard Gonzalez; Ann P O'Rourke; Joshua M Glazer; Anne Stey; Jacqueline M Kruser; Matthew M Churpek; Majid Afshar
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications can preoperatively predict breast cancer HER2 and Luminal a molecular subtype.

Authors:  DongZhi Cen; Li Xu; Ningna Li; Zhiguang Chen; Lu Wang; Shuqin Zhou; Biao Xu; Chun Ling Liu; Zaiyi Liu; Tingting Luo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings.

Authors:  S Rashmi; S Kamala; S Sudha Murthy; Swapna Kotha; Y Suhas Rao; K Veeraiah Chaudhary
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

10.  An imageomics and multi-network based deep learning model for risk assessment of liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer.

Authors:  Tiancheng He; Joy Nolte Fong; Linda W Moore; Chika F Ezeana; David Victor; Mukul Divatia; Matthew Vasquez; R Mark Ghobrial; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.