Literature DB >> 27569438

Performance and Validation of a Novel Biomarker-Based Stroke Risk Score for Atrial Fibrillation.

Jonas Oldgren1, Ziad Hijazi2, Johan Lindbäck2, John H Alexander2, Stuart J Connolly2, John W Eikelboom2, Michael D Ezekowitz2, Christopher B Granger2, Elaine M Hylek2, Renato D Lopes2, Agneta Siegbahn2, Salim Yusuf2, Lars Wallentin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased but variable risk of stroke. Our aim was to validate the recently developed biomarker-based ABC (age, biomarkers [high-sensitivity troponin and N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide], and clinical history of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack)-stroke risk score and compare its performance with the CHA2DS2VASc and ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) risk scores.
METHODS: The ABC-stroke score includes age, biomarkers (N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin), and clinical history (prior stroke). This validation was based on 8356 patients, 16 137 person-years of follow-up, and 219 adjudicated stroke or systemic embolic events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation in the RE-LY study (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). Levels of N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) were determined in plasma samples obtained at study entry.
RESULTS: The ABC-stroke score was well calibrated with 0.76 stroke/systemic embolic events per 100 person-years in the predefined low (<1%/y) risk group, 1.48 in the medium (1%-2%/y) risk group, and 2.60 in the high (>2%/y) risk group for the ABC-stroke score with hs-cTnT. Hazard ratios for stroke/systemic embolic events were 1.95 for medium- versus low-risk groups, and 3.44 for high- versus low-risk groups. ABC-stroke score achieved C indices of 0.65 with both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI, in comparison with 0.60 for CHA2DS2VASc (P=0.004 for hs-cTnT and P=0.022 hs-cTnI) and 0.61 for ATRIA scores (P=0.005 hs-cTnT and P=0.034 for hs-cTnI).
CONCLUSIONS: The biomarker-based ABC-stroke score was well calibrated and consistently performed better than both the CHA2DS2VASc and ATRIA stroke scores. The ABC score should be considered an improved decision support tool in the care of patients with atrial fibrillation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: ARISTOTLE, NCT00412984; RE-LY, NCT00262600.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticoagulation; atrial fibrillation; models, cardiovascular; prevention and control; risk assessment; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27569438     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

1.  Net Clinical Benefit of Oral Anticoagulation Among Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Sachin J Shah; Daniel E Singer; Margaret C Fang; Kristi Reynolds; Alan S Go; Mark H Eckman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-11-11

2.  Sustained atrial fibrillation increases the risk of anticoagulation-related bleeding in heart failure.

Authors:  Jürgen H Prochaska; Sebastian Göbel; Markus Nagler; Torben Knöpfler; Lisa Eggebrecht; Heidrun Lamparter; Marina Panova-Noeva; Karsten Keller; Meike Coldewey; Christoph Bickel; Michael Lauterbach; Roland Hardt; Christine Espinola-Klein; Hugo Ten Cate; Thomas Rostock; Thomas Münzel; Philipp S Wild
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Atrial fibrillation: New score for stroke risk.

Authors:  Irene Fernández-Ruiz
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Optimum Risk Assessment for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation: Should We Hold the Status Quo or Consider Magnitude Synergism and Left Atrial Appendage Anatomy?

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  Influence of Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Anticoagulation management in adult patients with congenital heart disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Christoph Sinning; Elvin Zengin; Gerhard Diller; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Carsten Rickers; Yskert von Kodolitsch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12

7.  Biomarkers in the clinical management of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Authors:  Ioanna Koniari; Eleni Artopoulou; Dimitrios Velissaris; Mark Ainslie; Virginia Mplani; Georgia Karavasili; Nicholas Kounis; Grigorios Tsigkas
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and the risk of stroke among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure: an APEX trial substudy.

Authors:  Gerald Chi; James L Januzzi; Serge Korjian; Yazan Daaboul; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Adrian F Hernandez; Russell D Hull; Alex Gold; Alexander T Cohen; Robert A Harrington; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Atrial Cardiopathy and Stroke Prevention.

Authors:  Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Predicting Thromboembolic and Bleeding Event Risk in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ethan D Borre; Adam Goode; Giselle Raitz; Bimal Shah; Angela Lowenstern; Ranee Chatterjee; Lauren Sharan; Nancy M Allen LaPointe; Roshini Yapa; J Kelly Davis; Kathryn Lallinger; Robyn Schmidt; Andrzej Kosinski; Sana M Al-Khatib; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.