Sachin J Shah1, Daniel E Singer2, Margaret C Fang1, Kristi Reynolds3, Alan S Go1,4, Mark H Eckman5. 1. University of California, San Francisco (S.J.S., M.C.F., A.S.G.). 2. Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.E.S.). 3. Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (K.R.). 4. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA (A.S.G.). 5. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH (M.H.E.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While guidelines recommend anticoagulation for all atrial fibrillation (AF) patients ≥75 years, evidence for the net clinical benefit (NCB) of anticoagulant in older adults is sparse. We sought to determine the association between age and NCB of anticoagulation in older adults with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined adults ≥75 years with incident AF in the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation-Cardiovascular Research Network cohort. Using a Markov state transition model, we estimated the lifetime NCB of warfarin and apixaban relative to no treatment in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the decision model, each month patients face a chance of stroke, hemorrhage, or death from a competing cause; the likelihood of each is a function of individual patients' stroke risk, hemorrhage risk, and life expectancy. We defined minimal clinically relevant lifetime benefit as 0.10 QALYs. In a sensitivity analysis, we examined the effect of competing risks of death on NCB using 2 models, one including competing risks and the second without competing risks. We included 14 946 patients, with a median age of 81 years and median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4. In the main analysis, after age 87, NCB associated with warfarin decreased below 0.10 lifetime QALYs while NCB associated with apixaban did not decrease below 0.10 lifetime QALYs until after age 92. In sensitivity analyses, over a 3-year horizon, removing competing risks of death resulted in higher NCB (at 90 years, median difference using warfarin 0.010 QALYs [95% CI, 0.009-0.013], median difference using apixaban 0.025 QALYs [95% CI, 0.024-0.026]). CONCLUSIONS: The NCB of anticoagulation decreases with advancing age. The competing risk of death diminishes the NCB of anticoagulation for older patients with AF. Physicians should consider competing mortality risks when recommending anticoagulants to older adults with AF.
BACKGROUND: While guidelines recommend anticoagulation for all atrial fibrillation (AF) patients ≥75 years, evidence for the net clinical benefit (NCB) of anticoagulant in older adults is sparse. We sought to determine the association between age and NCB of anticoagulation in older adults with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined adults ≥75 years with incident AF in the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation-Cardiovascular Research Network cohort. Using a Markov state transition model, we estimated the lifetime NCB of warfarin and apixaban relative to no treatment in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the decision model, each month patients face a chance of stroke, hemorrhage, or death from a competing cause; the likelihood of each is a function of individual patients' stroke risk, hemorrhage risk, and life expectancy. We defined minimal clinically relevant lifetime benefit as 0.10 QALYs. In a sensitivity analysis, we examined the effect of competing risks of death on NCB using 2 models, one including competing risks and the second without competing risks. We included 14 946 patients, with a median age of 81 years and median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4. In the main analysis, after age 87, NCB associated with warfarin decreased below 0.10 lifetime QALYs while NCB associated with apixaban did not decrease below 0.10 lifetime QALYs until after age 92. In sensitivity analyses, over a 3-year horizon, removing competing risks of death resulted in higher NCB (at 90 years, median difference using warfarin 0.010 QALYs [95% CI, 0.009-0.013], median difference using apixaban 0.025 QALYs [95% CI, 0.024-0.026]). CONCLUSIONS: The NCB of anticoagulation decreases with advancing age. The competing risk of death diminishes the NCB of anticoagulation for older patients with AF. Physicians should consider competing mortality risks when recommending anticoagulants to older adults with AF.
Authors: Margaret C Fang; Alan S Go; Yuchiao Chang; Elaine M Hylek; Lori E Henault; Nancy G Jensvold; Daniel E Singer Journal: Am J Med Date: 2007-05-24 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: David J Graham; Elande Baro; Rongmei Zhang; Jiemin Liao; Michael Wernecke; Marsha E Reichman; Mao Hu; Onyekachukwu Illoh; Yuqin Wei; Margie R Goulding; Yoganand Chillarige; Mary Ross Southworth; Thomas E MaCurdy; Jeffrey A Kelman Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Stuart J Connolly; John W Eikelboom; Jennifer Ng; Jack Hirsh; Salim Yusuf; Janice Pogue; Raffaele de Caterina; Stefan Hohnloser; Robert G Hart Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Christopher B Granger; John H Alexander; John J V McMurray; Renato D Lopes; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Jack Ansell; Dan Atar; Alvaro Avezum; M Cecilia Bahit; Rafael Diaz; J Donald Easton; Justin A Ezekowitz; Greg Flaker; David Garcia; Margarida Geraldes; Bernard J Gersh; Sergey Golitsyn; Shinya Goto; Antonio G Hermosillo; Stefan H Hohnloser; John Horowitz; Puneet Mohan; Petr Jansky; Basil S Lewis; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Alexander Parkhomenko; Freek W A Verheugt; Jun Zhu; Lars Wallentin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul S Chan; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Hitinder S Gurm; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sara Aspberg; Yuchiao Chang; Adriano Atterman; Matteo Bottai; Alan S Go; Daniel E Singer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Daniel E Singer; Yuchiao Chang; Margaret C Fang; Leila H Borowsky; Niela K Pomernacki; Natalia Udaltsova; Alan S Go Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Qiaoxi Chen; Kate Lapane; Anthony P Nunes; Jennifer Tjia; Julie Hugunin; Matthew Alcusky Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Wenfei Wei; Rafia S Rasu; José J Hernández-Muñoz; Renee J Flores; Nahid J Rianon; Genesis A Hernández-Vizcarrondo; Adam T Brown Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Sachin J Shah; Margaret C Fang; Sun Y Jeon; Steven E Gregorich; Kenneth E Covinsky Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Frederik Dalgaard; Haolin Xu; Roland A Matsouaka; Andrea M Russo; Anne B Curtis; Peter Vibe Rasmussen; Martin H Ruwald; Gregg C Fonarow; Angela Lowenstern; Morten L Hansen; Jannik L Pallisgaard; Karen P Alexander; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes; Christopher B Granger; William R Lewis; Jonathan P Piccini; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 5.501