Literature DB >> 27566369

[Intraoperative navigation, with focus on the skull base].

C R Wirtz1,2.   

Abstract

Intraoperative navigation systems are widely used in ENT, oral and maxillofacial, and neurosurgery. The benefits of such systems have been demonstrated in various applications, including intracranial and skull base surgery. Intraoperative shift, "brain shift" and changes in anatomy caused by the surgical procedure itself impair the accuracy of navigation and represent factors limiting its application, particularly in glioma and metastatic brain surgery. For this reason, intraoperative imaging was incorporated into neurosurgery. A specific application of navigation is thus skull base surgery, where shifts are often negligible due to the bony structures in which pathologies are embedded. Development of new systems with seamless integration into the operative workflow propagated routine use of navigation in neuro- and ENT surgery. Navigation proved especially helpful in interdisciplinary surgery with pathologies located in anatomic regions where competences of different surgical disciplines overlap, as in the skull base. While this increased radicality in tumour resection, there was a high risk of morbidity. The integration of electrophysiological function monitoring served to preserve function and reduce morbidity, and has led to less invasive and radical strategies in skull base surgery. New radiosurgical methods to adjuvantly treat possible tumour remnants have also supported this development. Systems allowing resection borders to be marked in the navigational coordinates would enable direct linking of these data to radiotherapy planning and better interpretation of follow-up imaging. Navigation is thus a valuable tool supporting interdisciplinary cooperation in skull base surgery for the benefit of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted surgery; Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; Neurosurgical procedures; Skull Base Surgery; Stereotaxic techniques

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566369     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0215-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  15 in total

Review 1.  Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery--a review and an assessment of technology.

Authors:  S Hassfeld; J Mühling
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Image-guided neurosurgery with intraoperative MRI: update of frameless stereotaxy and radicality control.

Authors:  C R Wirtz; V M Tronnier; M M Bonsanto; M Knauth; A Staubert; F K Albert; S Kunze
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Comparative study of application accuracy of two frameless neuronavigation systems: experimental error assessment quantifying registration methods and clinically influencing factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Andreas Unterberg; Roland Metzner; Jens Dreyhaupt; Georg Eggers; Christian Rainer Wirtz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Neuronavigation--first experiences with three different commercially available systems.

Authors:  C R Wirtz; M Knauth; S Hassfeld; V M Tronnier; F K Albert; M M Bonsanto; S Kunze
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  1998

5.  Low-grade Glioma Surgery in Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Assessment of the German Study Group for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jan Coburger; Andreas Merkel; Moritz Scherer; Felix Schwartz; Florian Gessler; Constantin Roder; Andrej Pala; Ralph König; Lars Bullinger; Gabriele Nagel; Christine Jungk; Sotirios Bisdas; Arya Nabavi; Oliver Ganslandt; Volker Seifert; Marcos Tatagiba; Christian Senft; Maximilian Mehdorn; Andreas W Unterberg; Karl Rössler; Christian Rainer Wirtz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  [CAS (computer assisted surgery). A new procedure in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  G Schlöndorff; R Mösges; D Meyer-Ebrecht; W Krybus; L Adams
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Three-dimensional digitizer (neuronavigator): new equipment for computed tomography-guided stereotaxic surgery.

Authors:  E Watanabe; T Watanabe; S Manaka; Y Mayanagi; K Takakura
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1987-06

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of linear array intraoperative ultrasound in glioblastoma surgery: a comparative study with high field intraoperative MRI and conventional sector array ultrasound.

Authors:  Jan Coburger; Angelika Scheuerle; Thomas Kapapa; Jens Engelke; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Christian R Wirtz; Ralph König
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  [Intraoperative navigation in surgery of paranasal sinus and anterior skull base].

Authors:  U Ecke; M Khan; J Maurer; S Boor; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Surgery for Glioblastoma: Impact of the Combined Use of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Intraoperative MRI on Extent of Resection and Survival.

Authors:  Jan Coburger; Vincent Hagel; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Ralph König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microscope-Based Augmented Reality with Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation for Resection of Skull Base Meningiomas in Consecutive Series of 39 Patients.

Authors:  Mirza Pojskić; Miriam H A Bopp; Benjamin Saβ; Barbara Carl; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.