Literature DB >> 26516822

Low-grade Glioma Surgery in Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Assessment of the German Study Group for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jan Coburger1, Andreas Merkel, Moritz Scherer, Felix Schwartz, Florian Gessler, Constantin Roder, Andrej Pala, Ralph König, Lars Bullinger, Gabriele Nagel, Christine Jungk, Sotirios Bisdas, Arya Nabavi, Oliver Ganslandt, Volker Seifert, Marcos Tatagiba, Christian Senft, Maximilian Mehdorn, Andreas W Unterberg, Karl Rössler, Christian Rainer Wirtz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment strategy for low-grade gliomas (LGGs) is a controversial topic. Additionally, only smaller single-center series dealing with the concept of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) have been published.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate determinants for patient outcome and progression-free-survival (PFS) after iMRI-guided surgery for LGGs in a multicenter retrospective study initiated by the German Study Group for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
METHODS: A retrospective consecutive assessment of patients treated for LGGs (World Health Organization grade II) with iMRI-guided resection at 6 neurosurgical centers was performed. Eloquent location, extent of resection, first-line adjuvant treatment, neurophysiological monitoring, awake brain surgery, intraoperative ultrasound, and field-strength of iMRI were analyzed, as well as progression-free survival (PFS), new permanent neurological deficits, and complications. Multivariate binary logistic and Cox regression models were calculated to evaluate determinants of PFS, gross total resection (GTR), and adjuvant treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 288 patients met the inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, GTR significantly increased PFS (hazard ratio, 0.44; P < .01), whereas "failed" GTR did not differ significantly from intended subtotal-resection. Combined radiochemotherapy as adjuvant therapy was a negative prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 2.84, P < .01). Field strength of iMRI was not associated with PFS. In the binary logistic regression model, use of high-field iMRI (odds ratio: 0.51, P < .01) was positively and eloquent location (odds ratio: 1.99, P < .01) was negatively associated with GTR. GTR was not associated with increased rates of new permanent neurological deficits.
CONCLUSION: GTR was an independent positive prognostic factor for PFS in LGG surgery. Patients with accidentally left tumor remnants showed a similar prognosis compared with patients harboring only partially resectable tumors. Use of high-field iMRI was significantly associated with GTR. However, the field strength of iMRI did not affect PFS. ABBREVIATIONS: EoR, extent of resectionFLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recoveryGTR, gross total resectionIDH1, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1iMRI, intraoperative magnetic resonance imagingLGG, low-grade gliomaMGMT, methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferasenPND, new permanent neurological deficitOS, overall survivalPFS, progression-free survivalSTR, subtotal resectionWHO, World Health Organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26516822     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of thin-plate spline deformation and finite element modeling to compensate for brain shift during tumor resection.

Authors:  Sarah Frisken; Ma Luo; Parikshit Juvekar; Adomas Bunevicius; Ines Machado; Prashin Unadkat; Melina M Bertotti; Matt Toews; William M Wells; Michael I Miga; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Technical principles in glioma surgery and preoperative considerations.

Authors:  Daria Krivosheya; Sujit S Prabhu; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  [Importance of preoperative and intraoperative imaging for operative strategies].

Authors:  P Nitschke; U Bork; V Plodeck; D Podlesek; S B Sobottka; G Schackert; J Weitz; M Kirsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Intraoperative navigation, with focus on the skull base].

Authors:  C R Wirtz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Hlavac; C R Wirtz; M-E Halatsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Awake mapping is not an additional surgical technique but an alternative philosophy in the management of low-grade glioma patients.

Authors:  Michael Buchfelder; Yining Zhao
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  The impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance in routine pediatric neurosurgical practice-a 6-year appraisal.

Authors:  Sonia Tejada; Shivaram Avula; Benedetta Pettorini; Dawn Henningan; Laurence Abernethy; Conor Mallucci
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Intraoperative MR and Synthetic Imaging.

Authors:  M I Vargas; B M A Delattre; P Vayssiere; M Corniola; T Meling
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Cara Marie Rogers; Pamela S Jones; Jeffrey S Weinberg
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Neurosurgical tools to extend tumor resection in pediatric hemispheric low-grade gliomas: iMRI.

Authors:  Mario Giordano; Cinta Arraez; Amir Samii; Madjid Samii; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.