Literature DB >> 16920244

Exposure data for personal care products: hairspray, spray perfume, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant.

Linda Loretz1, Anne Marie Api, Leila Barraj, Joel Burdick, De Ann Davis, William Dressler, Enrico Gilberti, Gwendolyn Jarrett, Steve Mann, Y H Laurie Pan, Thomas Re, Kevin Renskers, Carolyn Scrafford, Sally Vater.   

Abstract

Reliable exposure information for cosmetic and other personal care products and ingredients is needed in order to conduct safety assessments. Essential information includes both the amount of product applied, and the frequency of use. To obtain current data, studies to assess consumer use practices were undertaken. Six widely used personal care product types were included in the studies. Five of the products were cosmetics (spray perfume, hairspray, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash) and one product was a cosmetic/over-the-counter drug product (solid antiperspirant). Three hundred and sixty women, ages 19-65 years, who regularly use the products of interest, were recruited at 10 different geographical locations within the US. The number of recruits was chosen to ensure a minimum of three hundred completed responses per product type. Subjects were provided with a new container of the brand of product they normally use and kept diaries and recorded detailed daily usage information over a two week period. Products were weighed at the start and completion of the study in order to determine the total amount of product used. Statistical analyses of the data were conducted to derive summary distributions of use patterns. The geometric mean and median usage per application, respectively, for the six product types were: spray perfume, 0.33 g and 0.23 g; hairspray, 2.58 g and 1.83 g (aerosol); 3.64 g and 2.66 g (pump); liquid foundation, 0.54 g and 0.36 g; shampoo, 11.76 g and 9.56 g; body wash, 11.3g and 9.5 g; and solid antiperspirant, 0.61 g and 0.45 g. The mean and median usage per day for the six product types were: spray perfume, 0.53 g and 0.34 g; hairspray, 3.57 g and 2.71 g (aerosol); 5.18 g and 3.74 g (pump); liquid foundation, 0.67 g and 0.45 g; shampoo, 12.80 g and 10.75 g; body wash, 14.5 g and 12.9 g; and solid antiperspirant, 0.79 g and 0.59 g. The mean number of applications per day for spray perfume, hairspray, liquid foundation, shampoo, body wash, and solid antiperspirant was 1.67, 1.49 (aerosol) and 1.51 (pump), 1.24, 1.11, 1.37, and 1.3, respectively. This study provides current exposure information for commonly used products which will be useful for risk assessment purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16920244     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  22 in total

1.  Urinary and air phthalate concentrations and self-reported use of personal care products among minority pregnant women in New York city.

Authors:  Allan C Just; Jennifer J Adibi; Andrew G Rundle; Antonia M Calafat; David E Camann; Russ Hauser; Manori J Silva; Robin M Whyatt
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Stochastic modeling of near-field exposure to parabens in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Determining source strength of semivolatile organic compounds using measured concentrations in indoor dust.

Authors:  H-M Shin; T E McKone; M G Nishioka; M D Fallin; L A Croen; I Hertz-Picciotto; C J Newschaffer; D H Bennett
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 4.  Cosmetics use and age at menopause: is there a connection?

Authors:  Erika T Chow; Shruthi Mahalingaiah
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Methylparaben stimulates tumor initiating cells in ER+ breast cancer models.

Authors:  M Angeles Lillo; Cydney Nichols; Chanel Perry; Stephanie Runke; Raisa Krutilina; Tiffany N Seagroves; Gustavo A Miranda-Carboni; Susan A Krum
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Socioeconomic factors influencing cosmetic usage patterns.

Authors:  Gyeong-Hun Park; Chanhee Nam; Seungphil Hong; Byungcheol Park; Hakrim Kim; Taewon Lee; Kyubong Kim; Jong Hee Lee; Myung Hwa Kim
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  The association of urinary organophosphate ester metabolites and self-reported personal care and household product use among pregnant women in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M Vélez Vega; Gredia Huerta-Montanez; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products.

Authors:  Lauren E Parlett; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  High-throughput exposure modeling to support prioritization of chemicals in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; David E Meyer; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Allan C Just; Paige L Williams; Kristen W Smith; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.