Literature DB >> 27564577

Clinical and biomechanical perspectives on pressure injury prevention research: The case of prophylactic dressings.

A Gefen1, J Kottner2, N Santamaria3.   

Abstract

In this perspective paper, we discuss clinical and biomechanical viewpoints on pressure injury (or pressure ulcer) prevention research. We have selected to focus on the case of prophylactic dressings for pressure injury prevention, and the background of the historical context of pressure injury research, as an exemplar to illuminate some of the good and not so good in current biomechanical and clinical research in the wound prevention and care arena. Investigators who are conducting medical or clinical research in academia, in medical settings or in industry to determine the efficacy of wound prevention and care products could benefit from applying some basic principles that are detailed in this paper, and that should leverage the research outcomes, thereby contributing to setting higher standards in the field.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pressure injury; Pressure ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564577     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  10 in total

1.  Comment on 'Effectiveness of a multi-layer foam dressing in preventing sacral pressure ulcers for the early acute care of patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury: comparison with the use of a gel mattress'.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Effects of humidity on skin friction against medical textiles as related to prevention of pressure injuries.

Authors:  Danit Schwartz; Yana Katsman Magen; Ayelet Levy; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.

Authors:  Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva; Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Preventing pressure injuries in the emergency department: Current evidence and practice considerations.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Sue Creehan; Jacqui Fletcher; Paulo Alves; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Dressings cut to shape alleviate facial tissue loads while using an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Zehava Ovadia-Blechman; Oshrit Hoffer; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Release of sodium pyruvate from sacral prophylactic dressings: A computational model.

Authors:  Ayelet Levy; Jan Kottner; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Effects of Multilayer Silicone Foam Dressings for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Makoto Oe; Sanae Sasaki; Tomoko Shimura; Yoshie Takaki; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness of multi-layer silicone foam dressings for the prevention of pressure injuries in high-risk aged care residents: The Border III Trial.

Authors:  Nick Santamaria; Marie Gerdtz; Suzanne Kapp; Lauren Wilson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.