Hui-Juan Gao1,2, Hong-Mei Zhang1, Wei-Yu Dang1, Lin Liu1, Yun Zhu3, Qing He1, Xin Wang1, Yan-Hui Chen4, Fei Gao1, Qing-Xin Wang1, Hua Rong1, Shu-Ling Niu2, Rui-Hua Wei1. 1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, China. 2. Tianjin Third Central Hospital-Branch, Tianjin 300300, China. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300384, China. 4. Tangshan Eye Hospital, Tangshan 063016, Hebei Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of refractive errors and ocular biometry in 3573 freshman students at Tianjin Medical University for 4 consecutive years. METHODS: In this university-based, cross-sectional study, comprising 3573 students, visual acuity (VA), slit-lamp examination, non-cycloplegic auto-refraction, and ocular biometry were recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia increased annually, from 2017 to 2020 were 93.5%, 94.5%, 95.9%, and 96.2%, respectively (P=0.03), and the prevalence of high myopia was 25.7%, 26.9%, 28.6%, and 28.6%, respectively. Males tended to have a higher percentage of total astigmatism than females, with astigmatism ≥0.75 and ≥1.0 D criteria. The percentage of with-the-rule astigmatism, against-the-rule astigmatism, and oblique astigmatism was 90.3%, 5.8%, and 3.9%, respectively, with astigmatism ≥1.00 D criteria. The mean spherical equivalent, axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal radius (CR), and lens position (LP) were 4.37±2.52 D, 25.28±1.24 mm, 539.49±34.98 µm, 3.31±0.34 mm, 3.47±0.21 mm, 7.8±0.28 mm, and 5.04±0.32 mm, respectively. With diopter increase in myopia, the AL became longer, CR became steeper, ACD became deeper, LT became thinner, and LP became more posterior (all P<0.01). Females had a shorter AL, thinner CCT, smaller CR, shallower ACD, thicker lens, and more anterior LP than males (P<0.01). The 64% of high myopia had AL≥26 mm, meanwhile, 5.8% mild myopia and 21.1% moderate myopia had AL≥26 mm. With AL≥26 mm, mild and moderate myopia compared to high myopia, AL was shorter (26.51±0.46 vs 26.87±0.70 mm), CR was larger (8.10±0.3 vs 7.85±0.23 mm) and LT was thinner (3.39±0.19 vs 3.45±0.19 mm, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of myopia and high myopia is significantly high in freshman students. The majority of astigmatism is with-the-rule. Inconformity of refractive errors and ocular biometry existed in some students. Attention should be paid to the ocular biometry of myopia. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of refractive errors and ocular biometry in 3573 freshman students at Tianjin Medical University for 4 consecutive years. METHODS: In this university-based, cross-sectional study, comprising 3573 students, visual acuity (VA), slit-lamp examination, non-cycloplegic auto-refraction, and ocular biometry were recorded. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia increased annually, from 2017 to 2020 were 93.5%, 94.5%, 95.9%, and 96.2%, respectively (P=0.03), and the prevalence of high myopia was 25.7%, 26.9%, 28.6%, and 28.6%, respectively. Males tended to have a higher percentage of total astigmatism than females, with astigmatism ≥0.75 and ≥1.0 D criteria. The percentage of with-the-rule astigmatism, against-the-rule astigmatism, and oblique astigmatism was 90.3%, 5.8%, and 3.9%, respectively, with astigmatism ≥1.00 D criteria. The mean spherical equivalent, axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal radius (CR), and lens position (LP) were 4.37±2.52 D, 25.28±1.24 mm, 539.49±34.98 µm, 3.31±0.34 mm, 3.47±0.21 mm, 7.8±0.28 mm, and 5.04±0.32 mm, respectively. With diopter increase in myopia, the AL became longer, CR became steeper, ACD became deeper, LT became thinner, and LP became more posterior (all P<0.01). Females had a shorter AL, thinner CCT, smaller CR, shallower ACD, thicker lens, and more anterior LP than males (P<0.01). The 64% of high myopia had AL≥26 mm, meanwhile, 5.8% mild myopia and 21.1% moderate myopia had AL≥26 mm. With AL≥26 mm, mild and moderate myopia compared to high myopia, AL was shorter (26.51±0.46 vs 26.87±0.70 mm), CR was larger (8.10±0.3 vs 7.85±0.23 mm) and LT was thinner (3.39±0.19 vs 3.45±0.19 mm, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of myopia and high myopia is significantly high in freshman students. The majority of astigmatism is with-the-rule. Inconformity of refractive errors and ocular biometry existed in some students. Attention should be paid to the ocular biometry of myopia. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Authors: Yi Lu; Veronique Vitart; Kathryn P Burdon; Chiea Chuen Khor; Yelena Bykhovskaya; Alireza Mirshahi; Alex W Hewitt; Demelza Koehn; Pirro G Hysi; Wishal D Ramdas; Tanja Zeller; Eranga N Vithana; Belinda K Cornes; Wan-Ting Tay; E Shyong Tai; Ching-Yu Cheng; Jianjun Liu; Jia-Nee Foo; Seang Mei Saw; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Kari Stefansson; David P Dimasi; Richard A Mills; Jenny Mountain; Wei Ang; René Hoehn; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Franz Grus; Roger Wolfs; Raphaële Castagne; Karl J Lackner; Henriët Springelkamp; Jian Yang; Fridbert Jonasson; Dexter Y L Leung; Li J Chen; Clement C Y Tham; Igor Rudan; Zoran Vatavuk; Caroline Hayward; Jane Gibson; Angela J Cree; Alex MacLeod; Sarah Ennis; Ozren Polasek; Harry Campbell; James F Wilson; Ananth C Viswanathan; Brian Fleck; Xiaohui Li; David Siscovick; Kent D Taylor; Jerome I Rotter; Seyhan Yazar; Megan Ulmer; Jun Li; Brian L Yaspan; Ayse B Ozel; Julia E Richards; Sayoko E Moroi; Jonathan L Haines; Jae H Kang; Louis R Pasquale; R Rand Allingham; Allison Ashley-Koch; Paul Mitchell; Jie Jin Wang; Alan F Wright; Craig Pennell; Timothy D Spector; Terri L Young; Caroline C W Klaver; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael G Anderson; Tin Aung; Colin E Willoughby; Janey L Wiggs; Chi P Pang; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Andrew J Lotery; Christopher J Hammond; Cornelia M van Duijn; Michael A Hauser; Yaron S Rabinowitz; Norbert Pfeiffer; David A Mackey; Jamie E Craig; Stuart Macgregor; Tien Y Wong Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-01-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; David A Wilson; Monica Jong; Kovin S Naidoo; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Tien Y Wong; Thomas J Naduvilath; Serge Resnikoff Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Mohammad Shariati; Mohammad Miraftab; Abbasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Akbar Fotouhi Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res Date: 2015 Jul-Sep
Authors: Abbas Bagheri; Mohadeseh Feizi; Aliakbar Shafii; Amir Faramarzi; Mehdi Tavakoli; Shahin Yazdani Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res Date: 2018 Apr-Jun