Literature DB >> 27563053

The Roles of Mutation, Selection, and Expression in Determining Relative Rates of Evolution in Mitochondrial versus Nuclear Genomes.

Justin C Havird1, Daniel B Sloan1.   

Abstract

Eukaryotes rely on proteins encoded by the nuclear and mitochondrial (mt) genomes, which interact within multisubunit complexes such as oxidative-phosphorylation enzymes. Although selection is thought to be less efficient on the asexual mt genome, in bilaterian animals the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (ω) is lower in mt- compared with nuclear-encoded OXPHOS subunits, suggesting stronger effects of purifying selection in the mt genome. Because high levels of gene expression constrain protein sequence evolution, one proposed resolution to this paradox is that mt genes are expressed more highly than nuclear genes. To test this hypothesis, we investigated expression and sequence evolution of mt and nuclear genes from 84 diverse eukaryotes that vary in mt gene content and mutation rate. We found that the relationship between mt and nuclear ω values varied dramatically across eukaryotes. In contrast, transcript abundance is consistently higher for mt genes than nuclear genes, regardless of which genes happen to be in the mt genome. Consequently, expression levels cannot be responsible for the differences in ω Rather, 84% of the variance in the ratio of ω values between mt and nuclear genes could be explained by differences in mutation rate between the two genomes. We relate these findings to the hypothesis that high rates of mt mutation select for compensatory changes in the nuclear genome. We also propose an explanation for why mt transcripts consistently outnumber their nuclear counterparts, with implications for mitonuclear protein imbalance and aging.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  cytonuclear interactions; dN/dS; mitonuclear interactions; nuclear compensation.; positive selection; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27563053      PMCID: PMC5100045          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  87 in total

1.  High direct estimate of the mutation rate in the mitochondrial genome of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  D R Denver; K Morris; M Lynch; L L Vassilieva; W K Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome highlights signaling and regulatory components, provides assessment of targeting prediction programs, and indicates plant-specific mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Joshua L Heazlewood; Julian S Tonti-Filippini; Alexander M Gout; David A Day; James Whelan; A Harvey Millar
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Cytonuclear interactions and relaxed selection accelerate sequence evolution in organelle ribosomes.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Deborah A Triant; Martin Wu; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Synthesis and turnover rates of four rat liver mitochondrial RNA species.

Authors:  P Cantatore; Z Flagella; F Fracasso; A M Lezza; M N Gadaleta; A de Montalvo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1987-03-09       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 5.  Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Jian-Rong Yang
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology.

Authors:  David J Pagliarini; Sarah E Calvo; Betty Chang; Sunil A Sheth; Scott B Vafai; Shao-En Ong; Geoffrey A Walford; Canny Sugiana; Avihu Boneh; William K Chen; David E Hill; Marc Vidal; James G Evans; David R Thorburn; Steven A Carr; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Cytonuclear Interactions in the Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial tRNA Metabolism.

Authors:  Walker Pett; Dennis V Lavrov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Chad R Burrus; Chao Ji; Matthew W Hahn; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Parallel Structural Evolution of Mitochondrial Ribosomes and OXPHOS Complexes.

Authors:  Eli O van der Sluis; Heike Bauerschmitt; Thomas Becker; Thorsten Mielke; Jens Frauenfeld; Otto Berninghausen; Walter Neupert; Johannes M Herrmann; Roland Beckmann
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Sarah E Calvo; Karl R Clauser; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  34 in total

1.  Mitochondrial Mutation Rate, Spectrum and Heteroplasmy in Caenorhabditis elegans Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation Lines of Differing Population Size.

Authors:  Anke Konrad; Owen Thompson; Robert H Waterston; Donald G Moerman; Peter D Keightley; Ulfar Bergthorsson; Vaishali Katju
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Wolbachia Acquisition by Drosophila yakuba-Clade Hosts and Transfer of Incompatibility Loci Between Distantly Related Wolbachia.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Dan Vanderpool; William R Conner; Daniel R Matute; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  MSH1 is required for maintenance of the low mutation rates in plant mitochondrial and plastid genomes.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wu; Gus Waneka; Amanda K Broz; Connor R King; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mitochondrial Retroprocessing Promoted Functional Transfers of rpl5 to the Nucleus in Grasses.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wu; Daniel B Sloan; Colin W Brown; Mónica Rosenblueth; Jeffrey D Palmer; Han Chuan Ong
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Sex and Mitonuclear Adaptation in Experimental Caenorhabditis elegans Populations.

Authors:  Riana I Wernick; Stephen F Christy; Dana K Howe; Jennifer A Sullins; Joseph F Ramirez; Maura Sare; McKenna J Penley; Levi T Morran; Dee R Denver; Suzanne Estes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; Justin C Havird; Daniel B Sloan; Ronald S Burton; Chris Greening; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2018-12-26

Review 7.  Mitonuclear genomics and aging.

Authors:  Joseph C Reynolds; Conscience P Bwiza; Changhan Lee
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Lack of transcriptional coordination between mitochondrial and nuclear oxidative phosphorylation genes in the presence of two divergent mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Ran Xu; Mariangela Iannello; Justin C Havird; Liliana Milani; Fabrizio Ghiselli
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Towards a comprehensive picture of C-to-U RNA editing sites in angiosperm mitochondria.

Authors:  Alejandro A Edera; Carolina L Gandini; M Virginia Sanchez-Puerta
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 10.  Mitochondrial Short-Term Plastic Responses and Long-Term Evolutionary Dynamics in Animal Species.

Authors:  Sophie Breton; Fabrizio Ghiselli; Liliana Milani
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.