Literature DB >> 30588726

Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations.

Geoffrey E Hill1, Justin C Havird2, Daniel B Sloan3, Ronald S Burton4, Chris Greening5, Damian K Dowling5.   

Abstract

Metazoans exist only with a continuous and rich supply of chemical energy from oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria. The oxidative phosphorylation machinery that mediates energy conservation is encoded by both mitochondrial and nuclear genes, and hence the products of these two genomes must interact closely to achieve coordinated function of core respiratory processes. It follows that selection for efficient respiration will lead to selection for compatible combinations of mitochondrial and nuclear genotypes, and this should facilitate coadaptation between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes (mitonuclear coadaptation). Herein, we outline the modes by which mitochondrial and nuclear genomes may coevolve within natural populations, and we discuss the implications of mitonuclear coadaptation for diverse fields of study in the biological sciences. We identify five themes in the study of mitonuclear interactions that provide a roadmap for both ecological and biomedical studies seeking to measure the contribution of intergenomic coadaptation to the evolution of natural populations. We also explore the wider implications of the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions, focusing on central debates within the fields of ecology and biomedicine.
© 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coadaptation; coevolution; epistatic interactions; fitness; gene flow; mitochondria; mitochondrial medicine; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30588726      PMCID: PMC6613652          DOI: 10.1111/brv.12493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  164 in total

1.  Effects of purifying and adaptive selection on regional variation in human mtDNA.

Authors:  Eduardo Ruiz-Pesini; Dan Mishmar; Martin Brandon; Vincent Procaccio; Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Migration-selection balance and local adaptation of mitochondrial haplotypes in rufous-collared sparrows (Zonotrichia capensis) along an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Zachary A Cheviron; Robb T Brumfield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Mitochondrial bioenergetics as a major motive force of speciation.

Authors:  Moran Gershoni; Alan R Templeton; Dan Mishmar
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Mechanisms and costs of mitochondrial thermal acclimation in a eurythermal killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus).

Authors:  Dillon J Chung; Patricia M Schulte
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Accelerated evolution of the electron transport chain in anthropoid primates.

Authors:  Lawrence I Grossman; Derek E Wildman; Timothy R Schmidt; Morris Goodman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Incompatibility between Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genomes Contributes to an Interspecies Reproductive Barrier.

Authors:  Hong Ma; Nuria Marti Gutierrez; Robert Morey; Crystal Van Dyken; Eunju Kang; Tomonari Hayama; Yeonmi Lee; Ying Li; Rebecca Tippner-Hedges; Don P Wolf; Louise C Laurent; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 27.287

7.  Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Brandon S Cooper; Chad R Burrus; Chao Ji; Matthew W Hahn; Kristi L Montooth
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Mitonuclear Epistasis for Development Time and Its Modification by Diet in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jim A Mossman; Leann M Biancani; Chen-Tseh Zhu; David M Rand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Uniparental Inheritance Promotes Adaptive Evolution in Cytoplasmic Genomes.

Authors:  Joshua R Christie; Madeleine Beekman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 10.  The rate of adaptive evolution in animal mitochondria.

Authors:  Jennifer E James; Gwenael Piganeau; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Selfish Mitonuclear Conflict.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Evan S Forsythe; Alissa M Williams; John H Werren; Damian K Dowling; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  High mitochondrial mutation rates in Silene are associated with nuclear-mediated changes in mitochondrial physiology.

Authors:  Ryan J Weaver; Gina Carrion; Rachel Nix; Gerald P Maeda; Samantha Rabinowitz; Erik N K Iverson; Kiley Thueson; Justin C Havird
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Faraway, so close. The comparative method and the potential of non-model animals in mitochondrial research.

Authors:  Liliana Milani; Fabrizio Ghiselli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Reciprocal cybrids reveal how organellar genomes affect plant phenotypes.

Authors:  Pádraic J Flood; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Korbinian Schneeberger; Paul Keizer; Willem Kruijer; Edouard Severing; Evangelos Kouklas; Jos A Hageman; Raúl Wijfjes; Vanesa Calvo-Baltanas; Frank F M Becker; Sabine K Schnabel; Leo A J Willems; Wilco Ligterink; Jeroen van Arkel; Roland Mumm; José M Gualberto; Linda Savage; David M Kramer; Joost J B Keurentjes; Fred van Eeuwijk; Maarten Koornneef; Jeremy Harbinson; Mark G M Aarts; Erik Wijnker
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 5.  Mitonuclear genomics and aging.

Authors:  Joseph C Reynolds; Conscience P Bwiza; Changhan Lee
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  The role of mitonuclear incompatibilities in allopatric speciation.

Authors:  Ronald S Burton
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Lack of transcriptional coordination between mitochondrial and nuclear oxidative phosphorylation genes in the presence of two divergent mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Ran Xu; Mariangela Iannello; Justin C Havird; Liliana Milani; Fabrizio Ghiselli
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 8.  Psychiatric drugs impact mitochondrial function in brain and other tissues.

Authors:  Shawna T Chan; Michael J McCarthy; Marquis P Vawter
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Strong selective effects of mitochondrial DNA on the nuclear genome.

Authors:  Timothy M Healy; Ronald S Burton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mitochondrial DNA content in eggs as a maternal effect.

Authors:  Sin-Yeon Kim; Violette Chiara; Náyade Álvarez-Quintero; Alberto Velando
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.