Literature DB >> 27562478

Radiation doses to operators performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using a flat-panel detector-based system and ultrasound guidance for portal vein targeting.

Roberto Miraglia1, Roberta Gerasia2, Luigi Maruzzelli2, Mario D'Amico2, Angelo Luca2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate effective dose (E) of operators performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in a single centre. Patients' radiation exposure was also collected.
METHODS: Between 8/2015 and 6/2016, 45 consecutive TIPS were performed in adult patients using a flat-panel detector-based system (FPDS) and real-time ultrasound guidance (USG) for portal vein targeting. Electronic personal dosimeters were used to measure radiation doses to the primary and assistant operators, anaesthesia nurse and radiographer. Patients' radiation exposure was measured with dose area product (DAP); fluoroscopy time (FT) was also collected.
RESULTS: Mean E for the primary operator was 1.40 μSv (SD 2.68, median 0.42, range 0.12 - 12.18), for the assistant operator was 1.29 μSv (SD 1.79, median 0.40, range 0.10 - 4.89), for the anaesthesia nurse was 0.21 μSv (SD 0.67, median 0.10, range 0.03 - 3.99), for the radiographer was 0.42 μSv (SD 0.71, median 0.25, range 0.03 - 2.67). Mean patient DAP was 59.31 GyCm2 (SD 56.91, median 31.58, range 7.66 - 281.40); mean FT was 10.20 min (SD 7.40, median 10.40, range 3.8 - 31.8).
CONCLUSION: The use of FPDS and USG for portal vein targeting allows a reasonably low E to operators performing TIPS. KEY POINTS: • The operators' E vary according to the complexity of the procedure. • FPDS and USG allow a reasonably low E to TIPS operators. • FPDS and USG have an important role in reducing the occupational exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver; Occupational exposure; Radiation protection; TIPS; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562478     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4558-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  The interdependence of staff and patient doses in interventional radiology.

Authors:  J R Williams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Donald L Miller; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Stephen Balter; Ruth A Kleinerman; Evgenia Ostroumova; Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Deukwoo Kwon; Grant H Bonavia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The estimation of occupational effective dose in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters.

Authors:  L T Niklason; M V Marx; H P Chan
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Radiation Exposure in Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation.

Authors:  Roberto Miraglia; Luigi Maruzzelli; Kelvin Cortis; Mario D'Amico; Gaetano Floridia; Giuseppe Gallo; Corrado Tafaro; Angelo Luca
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Radiation risks for the radiologist performing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

Authors:  N Hidajat; P Wust; M Kreuschner; R Felix; R-J Schröder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Patient and staff radiation dose in fluoroscopy-guided TIPS procedures and dose reduction, using dedicated fluoroscopy exposure settings.

Authors:  D Zweers; J Geleijns; N J Aarts; L J Hardam; J S Laméris; F W Schultz; L J Schultze Kool
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Is brain cancer an occupational disease of cardiologists?

Authors:  M M Finkelstein
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Luciano Gonzalez; Jose M Fernández; Ziv J Haskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Cancer and non-cancer brain and eye effects of chronic low-dose ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Eliseo Vano; Luciano Domenici; Matteo Bottai; Isabelle Thierry-Chef
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

1.  Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France.

Authors:  Cécile Etard; Emeline Bigand; Cécile Salvat; Vincent Vidal; Jean Paul Beregi; Amaury Hornbeck; Joël Greffier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Reduction of operator radiation exposure using a passive robotic device during fluoroscopy-guided arterial puncture: an experimental study in a swine model.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Ahmad Khan; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Byung-Ju Yi
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 3.  Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Evidence-Based Guidelines for Interventions in Portal Hypertension and Its Complications.

Authors:  Amar Mukund; Shaleen Rana; Chander Mohan; Naveen Kalra; Sanjay Saran Baijal
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-10

4.  Reduction of radiation exposure to operating physician and assistant using a real-time auditory feedback dosimeter during femoral artery puncturing: a study on swine model.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Ahmad Khan; Byung-Ju Yi
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.