Literature DB >> 27562165

Interplay between hydrophobicity and the positive-inside rule in determining membrane-protein topology.

Assaf Elazar1, Jonathan Jacob Weinstein1, Jaime Prilusky2, Sarel Jacob Fleishman3.   

Abstract

The energetics of membrane-protein interactions determine protein topology and structure: hydrophobicity drives the insertion of helical segments into the membrane, and positive charges orient the protein with respect to the membrane plane according to the positive-inside rule. Until recently, however, quantifying these contributions met with difficulty, precluding systematic analysis of the energetic basis for membrane-protein topology. We recently developed the dsTβL method, which uses deep sequencing and in vitro selection of segments inserted into the bacterial plasma membrane to infer insertion-energy profiles for each amino acid residue across the membrane, and quantified the insertion contribution from hydrophobicity and the positive-inside rule. Here, we present a topology-prediction algorithm called TopGraph, which is based on a sequence search for minimum dsTβL insertion energy. Whereas the average insertion energy assigned by previous experimental scales was positive (unfavorable), the average assigned by TopGraph in a nonredundant set is -6.9 kcal/mol. By quantifying contributions from both hydrophobicity and the positive-inside rule we further find that in about half of large membrane proteins polar segments are inserted into the membrane to position more positive charges in the cytoplasm, suggesting an interplay between these two energy contributions. Because membrane-embedded polar residues are crucial for substrate binding and conformational change, the results implicate the positive-inside rule in determining the architectures of membrane-protein functional sites. This insight may aid structure prediction, engineering, and design of membrane proteins. TopGraph is available online (topgraph.weizmann.ac.il).

Keywords:  Bellman–Ford search; membrane insertion; positive-inside rule; topology prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562165      PMCID: PMC5027447          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605888113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jack Schonbrun; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

3.  Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Weizhong Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Has the code for protein translocation been broken?

Authors:  Dalit Shental-Bechor; Sarel J Fleishman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Protter: interactive protein feature visualization and integration with experimental proteomic data.

Authors:  Ulrich Omasits; Christian H Ahrens; Sebastian Müller; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Side-chain hydrophobicity scale derived from transmembrane protein folding into lipid bilayers.

Authors:  C Preston Moon; Karen G Fleming
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of transmembrane helix predictions in 2014.

Authors:  Jonas Reeb; Edda Kloppmann; Michael Bernhofer; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-01-22

8.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Prediction of membrane protein structures with complex topologies using limited constraints.

Authors:  P Barth; B Wallner; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structural basis for alternating access of a eukaryotic calcium/proton exchanger.

Authors:  Andrew B Waight; Bjørn Panyella Pedersen; Avner Schlessinger; Massimiliano Bonomi; Bryant H Chau; Zygy Roe-Zurz; Aaron J Risenmay; Andrej Sali; Robert M Stroud
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Contribution of Cotranslational Folding Defects to Membrane Protein Homeostasis.

Authors:  Francis J Roushar; Timothy C Gruenhagen; Wesley D Penn; Bian Li; Jens Meiler; Beata Jastrzebska; Jonathan P Schlebach
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Inward-facing conformation of a multidrug resistance MATE family transporter.

Authors:  Sandra Zakrzewska; Ahmad Reza Mehdipour; Viveka Nand Malviya; Tsuyoshi Nonaka; Juergen Koepke; Cornelia Muenke; Winfried Hausner; Gerhard Hummer; Schara Safarian; Hartmut Michel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  De novo designed transmembrane peptides activating the α5β1 integrin.

Authors:  Marco Mravic; Hailin Hu; Zhenwei Lu; Joel S Bennett; Charles R Sanders; A Wayne Orr; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 1.650

4.  Interaction Between Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone and GM1-Doped Cholesterol/Sphingomyelin Vesicles: A Spectroscopic Study.

Authors:  Zarrin Shahzadi; Chaitali Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  The importance of the membrane interface as the reference state for membrane protein stability.

Authors:  Jakob P Ulmschneider; Jeremy C Smith; Stephen H White; Martin B Ulmschneider
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Mechanism of loading and translocation of type VI secretion system effector Tse6.

Authors:  Dennis Quentin; Shehryar Ahmad; Premy Shanthamoorthy; Joseph D Mougous; John C Whitney; Stefan Raunser
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 17.745

7.  Improving the topology prediction of α-helical transmembrane proteins with deep transfer learning.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Haolin Zhong; Zhidong Xue; Yan Wang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.155

8.  Statistically derived asymmetric membrane potentials from α-helical and β-barrel membrane proteins.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Richard Bonneau; Martin B Ulmschneider
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Structure-based insights into evolution of rhodopsins.

Authors:  Dmitrii Zabelskii; Natalia Dmitrieva; Oleksandr Volkov; Vitaly Shevchenko; Kirill Kovalev; Taras Balandin; Dmytro Soloviov; Roman Astashkin; Egor Zinovev; Alexey Alekseev; Ekaterina Round; Vitaly Polovinkin; Igor Chizhov; Andrey Rogachev; Ivan Okhrimenko; Valentin Borshchevskiy; Vladimir Chupin; Georg Büldt; Natalia Yutin; Ernst Bamberg; Eugene Koonin; Valentin Gordeliy
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Biological Machine Learning Combined with Campylobacter Population Genomics Reveals Virulence Gene Allelic Variants Cause Disease.

Authors:  Dj Darwin R Bandoy; Bart C Weimer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.