| Literature DB >> 27559360 |
Tingting You1, Lupeng Shao1, Ruizhen Wang1, Liming Zhang1, Feng Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Solid acid catalyzed inexpensive ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment is promising because of its effectiveness at decreasing biomass recalcitrance to subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis or in situ hydrolysis of carbohydrate oligomers. However, the conventional strategy was limited by the complex non-isothermal process and considering only one aspect of sugar recovery. In this study, facile isothermal pretreatments using Amberlyst 35DRY catalyzed 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C4mim]Cl) at mild conditions were developed on bioenergy crop Arundo donax Linn. to enhance the combined sugars released. The physicochemical differences, enzymatic digestibility, and sugars released in situ were evaluated and compared to define the best set of conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Acid enhanced ionic liquid pretreatment; Arundo donax Linn.; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Total reducing sugars
Year: 2016 PMID: 27559360 PMCID: PMC4995755 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0589-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Mass recovery and crystallinity of the raw and pretreated A. donax under different conditions
| Samples | Pretreatment conditions | Recovered | CrI (%) | LOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [C4mim]Cl | Amberlyst 35DRY | ||||
| Raw | Untreated | Untreated | 100 | 36.0 | 1.43 |
| R90-1.0 | 90 °C 3 h | 90 °C 1.0 h | 95.4 | 29.4 | 0.93 |
| R100-1.0 | 100 °C 3 h | 100 °C 1.0 h | 78.4 | 31.4 | 0.58 |
| R110-1.0 | 110 °C 3 h | 110 °C 1.0 h | 58.0 | 24.7 | 0.63 |
| R120-0.5 | 120 °C 3 h | 120 °C 0.5 h | 66.1 | 23.2 | 0.53 |
| R120-1.0 | 120 °C 3 h | 120 °C 1.0 h | 46.7 | 25.8 | 1.03 |
| R120-1.5 | 120 °C 3 h | 120 °C 1.5 h | 31.7 | 27.3 | 0.56 |
| R130-0.5 | 130 °C 3 h | 130 °C 0.5 h | 53.5 | 25.2 | 0.86 |
| R140-0.5 | 140 °C 3 h | 140 °C 0.5 h | 28.2 | 25.8 | 1.15 |
| R150-0.5 | 150 °C 3 h | 150 °C 0.5 h | 25.8 | 16.5 | 13.78 |
Chemical composition of the raw and pretreated A. donax obtained after isothermal [C4mim]Cl-Amberlyst 35DRY pretreatments
| Samples | Cellulose | Hemicelluloses | AILa | ASLb | Ash | Acetyl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | 44.59 (44.59)c | 17.52 (17.52) | 19.15 (19.15) | 1.39 (1.39) | 0.81 (0.81) | 4.91 (4.91) |
| R90-1.0 | 44.77 (42.71) | 17.15 (16.36) | 18.19 (17.35) | 1.2 (1.14) | 1.09 (1.04) | 4.70 (4.49) |
| R100-1.0 | 52.38 (41.07) | 15.7 (12.31) | 19.06 (14.94) | 1.25 (0.98) | 1.11 (0.87) | 4.89 (3.84) |
| R110-1.0 | 56.56 (32.80) | 11.21 (6.50) | 23.27 (13.50) | 1.32 (0.77) | 1.66 (0.96) | 4.22 (2.45) |
| R120-0.5 | 51.39 (33.97) | 14.13 (9.34) | 22.73 (15.02) | 1.17 (0.77) | 1.23 (0.81) | 4.24 (2.79) |
| R120-1.0 | 47.43 (22.15) | 11.65 (5.44) | 25.35 (11.84) | 1.03 (0.48) | 1.72 (0.80) | 4.31 (2.01) |
| R120-1.5 | 42.99 (13.63) | 9.51 (3.01) | 34.46 (10.92) | 1.06 (0.34) | 1.81 (0.57) | 3.99 (1.27) |
| R130-0.5 | 54.24 (29.02) | 13.85 (7.41) | 23.72 (12.69) | 1.21 (0.65) | 1.57 (0.84) | 4.64 (2.48) |
| R140-0.5 | 46.14 (13.01) | 8.6 (2.43) | 39.22 (11.06) | 1.12 (0.32) | 2.6 (0.73) | 4.84 (1.36) |
| R150-0.5 | 23.62 (6.09) | 10.19 (2.63) | 46.99 (12.12) | 1.03 (0.27) | 2.00 (0.52) | 4.77 (1.23) |
Data refer to the samples, in terms of cellulose, hemicellulose, AIL, ASL, ash, and acetyl contents (w/w, dry weight basis). Data are means of three replicates
aacid insoluble lignin
bacid soluble lignin
crelative content (mass recovery × relative content)
Fig. 1Cellulose conversions of raw and pretreated A. donax. by enzymatic saccharification. Cellulose conversions expressed as percentage of the theoretical glucose in pretreated samples. a Effect of solid acid reaction time (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 h) on enzymatic hydrolysis, b Effect of low pretreatment temperature (90, 100, and 110 °C) on enzymatic hydrolysis, and c effect of high pretreatment temperature (130, 140, and 150 °C) on enzymatic hydrolysis. Error bars indicate standard deviation of triplicate determinations. Sample code with definition is in Table 1
Enzymatic saccharification and products in pretreatment liquor of raw and pretreated A. donax
| Samples | Enzymatic hydrolysis | Pretreatment liquora | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial enzymatic rate (g/kg/h)b | Reducing sugar (g/100 g)c | Cellulose digestibility (%)d | TRS (%) | ASL (%) | Lactic acid (%) | Acetic acid (%) | Formic acid (%) | HMF (%) | FF (%) | |
| Raw | 17 | 9.7 | 12.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| R90-1.0 | 87 | 24.6 | 36.7 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 4.98 | NDe | ND | ND | ND |
| R100-1.0 | 57 | 25.7 | 41.9 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 4.90 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R110-1.0 | 92 | 29.6 | 66.7 | 28.8 | 2.6 | 4.70 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R120-0.5 | 146 | 30.9 | 66.7 | 18.1 | 2.4 | 4.96 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R120-1.0 | 167 | 21.9 | 73.2 | 31.8 | 3.7 | 4.96 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R120-1.5 | 226 | 15.3 | 90.2 | 43.0 | 5.8 | 5.94 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R130-0.5 | 149 | 26.4 | 65.2 | 23.5 | 3.3 | 5.06 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R140-0.5 | 177 | 11.5 | 69.6 | 40.4 | 5.8 | 5.72 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| R150-0.5 | 92 | 3.9 | 41.0 | 35.2 | 6.1 | 5.56 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
All data are means of three replicates
aData referred to the products in pretreatment liquor are based on dry raw materials
bSugar released within the first 3 h based on dry pretreated sample
cSum of glucose and xylose released in the enzymatic hydrolysates based on dry raw materials
dData are calculated after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis at 48 °C
eNo detectable levels (below 0.1 % based on dry raw materials)
Fig. 2Comparison of total glucose and xylose recovery of raw and pretreated A. donax. after enzymatic saccharification. The sugars were recovered after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis at 48 °C and 150 rpm and expressed as percentage of the original biomass. Error bars indicate standard deviation of triplicate determinations. Sample code with definition is in Table 1
Fig. 3X-ray diffractograms of the raw and pretreated A. donax. Sample code with definition is in Table 1
Fig. 4Effect of isothermal pretreatment conditions on TRS and ASL released. TRS in pretreatment liquor was measured by the DNS method. ASL in pretreatment liquor was detected at 320 nm on a UV2300 spectroscopy. The yields expressed as percentage of the original biomass. Error bars indicate standard deviation of triplicate determinations. Sample code with definition is in Table 1
Fig. 5Mass balance of [C4mim]Cl-Amberlyst 35DRY isothermal pretreatment for the selected conditions. a IL pretreated at 110 °C, following by solid acid Amberlyst 35DRY catalyzed for 1.0 h, b IL pretreated at 120 °C, following by solid acid Amberlyst 35DRY catalyzed for 0.5 h, and c IL pretreated at 120 °C, following by solid acid Amberlyst 35DRY catalyzed for 1.5 h. Mass balanced adjusted to 100 g starting biomass. Values presented ±SD