| Literature DB >> 25642286 |
Mitsuo Horita1, Hiroko Kitamoto1, Tetsuo Kawaide2,3, Yasuhiro Tachibana2, Yukiko Shinozaki1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In an attempt to reduce environmental loading during ethanol production from cellulosic plant biomass, we have previously proposed an on-site solid state fermentation (SSF) method for producing ethanol from whole crops, which at the same time provides cattle feed without producing wastes. During the ensiling of freshly harvested plant biomass with cellulase and glucoamylase, the added yeast and lactic acid bacteria induced simultaneous saccharification and production of ethanol and lactic acid in hermetically sealed containers on-farm. In a previous study, laboratory-scale SSF (using 250 g of fresh rice crop biomass) yielded 16.9 weight % ethanol in dry matter (DM) after 20 days of incubation. In this study, the fermentation volume was scaled up to a normal-sized round bale and the fermentation process (ethanol concentrations of the products) was monitored. The ethanol produced was recovered and the recovery efficiency was evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Bioethanol; Nutritional value; Round bale; Solid state fermentation; Whole crop forage rice
Year: 2015 PMID: 25642286 PMCID: PMC4311456 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-014-0192-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Solid state fermentation (SSF) using non-sterilized whole forage rice plant round bales. Ethanol and lactic acid production from forage rice cultivars (a) Leaf Star, (b) Tachisugata, and (c) Tachisuzuka with the addition of 0.74 to 0.77 filter paper degradation unit (FPU)/g dry matter (DM) cellulase from Acremonium cellulolyticus, 0.28 to 0.29 U/g DM glucoamylase, freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria (2 × 105 colony forming unit (cfu)/g DM), and freeze-dried yeast (3 × 106 cfu/g DM) mixture (SSF) or freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria only (silage) are shown. Values are expressed as the mean with standard error bars (n = 3 (cv. Leaf Star), n = 2 (cv. Tachisugata), or n = 4 (cv. Tachisuzuka)).
Weight loss of solid state fermented (SSF) and silage round bales
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Leaf Star (SSF) | 125.2 | 75.2 | 50.0 | 39.9 |
| Tachisugata (SSF) | 146.9 | 104.3 | 42.6 | 29.0 |
| Tachisuzuka (SSF) | 151.4 | 107.8 | 43.6 | 28.8 |
| Tachisugata (silage) | 140.3 | 118.8 | 21.5 | 15.3 |
| Tachisuzuka (silage) | 150.9 | 127.2 | 23.7 | 15.7 |
Ethanol and lactic acid concentration, moisture, and pH in solid state fermented (SSF) round bale of whole forage rice plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf Star | 1 | Upper | 128.7x | 24.8x | 68.6x | 3.96 |
| Middle | 132.6x | 29.9x | 67.2x | 3.93 | ||
| Lower | 117.1x | 26.7x | 63.7x | 3.99 | ||
| 2 | Upper | 155.3x | 29.7x | 68.0x | 4.03 | |
| Middle | 178.7x | 31.4x | 70.4x | 4.00 | ||
| Lower | 169.3x | 31.0x | 69.7x | 3.99 | ||
| Tachisugata | 1 | Upper | 42.4y | 19.5y | 59.0xy | 4.12 |
| Middle | 45.4y | 21.8xy | 57.5y | 4.10 | ||
| Lower | 178.5x | 26.9x | 64.2x | 3.90 | ||
| Tachisuzuka | 1 | Upper | 60.5y | 19.5y | 58.1y | 4.07 |
| Middle | 72.5y | 19.4y | 62.0y | 4.08 | ||
| Lower | 133.8x | 48.6x | 72.0x | 3.91 | ||
| 2 | Upper | 72.5y | 23.1y | 62.3xy | 4.11 | |
| Middle | 90.9y | 23.5y | 61.9y | 4.12 | ||
| Lower | 143.4x | 38.8x | 68.3x | 3.95 |
Whole rice plant round bales (about 0.8 m height and 1 m diameter) after each SSF test (9 to 14 months’ incubation) were opened and three samples from each of the three distinct height sampling sites (upper (>60 cm), middle (30 to 60 cm), and lower (<30 cm)) in the round bale were collected individually, and ethanol and lactic acid concentration, moisture, and pH were analyzed.
aDifferent alphabetical letters following the number indicate significant differences (P <0.05, Scheffe’s test) among sampling sites within the same round bale.
Figure 2Variation of temperatures inside and outside of solid state fermented (SSF) and silage round bales. Daily average temperatures inside (30 cm depth) and outside (ambient) of the SSF and silage round bales (cv. Tachisuzuka) throughout the fermentation period (November 2011 to August 2012) are shown.
Figure 3Loss of solid state fermented (SSF) and silage round bale weight and amount of ethanol recovered with drain. (a) The round bale weight (DM) and (b) the amount of recovered ethanol during the SSF test were measured every month. Values are expressed as the mean with standard error bars (n = 4). DM, dry matter.
Ethanol recovery from solid state fermented (SSF) round bales using a vacuum distiller
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| First | 232 | 12.3 | 5.2 | 42.3 | 6 |
| Second | 244 | 12.4 | 10.7 | 86.3 | 12 |
| Total | 476 | 24.7 | 15.9 | 64.4 | 18 |
Ethanol recovery test from SSF round bales of whole forage rice plant (cv. Leaf Star) using a pilot-scale vacuum distiller (Tokai Resource Co.) was repeated two times with distinct distillation times (6 and 12 hours), and the amounts of recovered ethanol were compared.
Composition of fresh, silage, and solid state fermented (SSF) materials of forage rice plants (cv. Tachisuzuka)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 56.2 | 63.9 | 64.7 |
| Weight lossb | - | 15.7 | 28.8 |
| Cellulosec,d | 22.0 | 22.1 (18.6)g | 22.0 (15.7) |
| Hemicellulosed, e | 15.2 | 12.1 (10.2) | 13.8 (9.8) |
| Lignind | 2.9 | 3.4 (2.9) | 4.0 (2.8) |
| Starchd | 18.9 | 20.2 (17.0) | 5.3 (3.8) |
| Hexosef | 5.4 | 0.4 (0.3) | 7.6 (5.4) |
| Xylose | 0.0 | 0.5 (0.4) | 1.7 (1.2) |
| Lactic acid | 0.0 | 2.4 (2.0) | 3.4 (2.4) |
| Total carbon | 34.34 | 37.29 (31.44) | 36.77 (26.20) |
| Total nitrogen | 0.47 | 0.73 (0.62) | 1.08 (0.77) |
| Carbon:nitrogen | 72.9 | 51.4 | 34.1 |
| pH | 5.68 | 4.17 | 4.00 |
aPercent by dry matter.
bWeight loss by dry matter during fermentation process (Table 1).
cAcid detergent fiber (ADF) - lignin.
dComposition analysis was carried out by Japan Food Research Laboratories.
eNeutral detergent fiber (NDF) - ADF.
fGlucose + fructose + sucrose.
gNumbers in parentheses indicate the composition (%) × (100 - weight loss (%))/100.